Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM02271
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: T06CM02271 155 W. Valencia, New Dollar General Retail Store Commercial Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 16, 2007 COMMENTS: Please contact me for a counter appointment to review the following requested revisions. I can be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4951. 1. (Per last review) Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, please provide a legal description for the property. Staff noted the property is listed as being subject to a lot split in 2005 under Pima County Assessor's records. Please provide any lot split plans that have been approved through the city review process, as required. RESPONSE: THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, provide typical detail drawings for class 2 bicycle racks. RESPONSE: The bicycle parking calculations and location meet code, thank you. DS 2-09 has recently changed with regards to bicycle lockers/posts that are acceptable per code. The bicycle post system proposed unfortunately no longer is permitted per the revised DS. Please review the back of DS 2-09 for bicycle racks/posts that are permitted and revise the plan. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12 and Per DS 2-08, regarding sidewalks: A) Please provide a dimensioned spec drawing for the hand rails. B) Truncated domes are to be provided only in a 2' wide strip where transitioning from vehicular to pedestrian use area. Please reduce the width of the truncated domes pad C) Remove the truncated domes proposed at the north end of the handicapped access aisle closest to the PAAL (the t.domes provided at the handicapped ramp at the top of the access aisle shall suffice to warn of a crossing area). D) Please move the truncated domes proposed in the north parking area, coming from the north side of the site. Move them farther north - to start at the curb and continue in a 2' wide strip north of the curb. (out of the vehicular use area) 4. With regards to the Airport Environs Zone: A) Provide note: This site is within the CUZ-2 and AHD of the Airport Environs Zone B) Provide note: This site shall comply with LUC Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone. C) List the elevation of the closest runway, NW 11L is 2575 feet MSL D) List max elevation/tallest point of structure allowed at 80' above 2575, or 2655 MSL. E) List elevation of site (appears to be 2520 on COT maps) F) List maximum elevation of the building (at top of parapet - from grade) based upon site elevation. (Note, I am not concerned about the height of the structure, these notes are for records for AEZ compliance - I did the review prior, just forgot to have you add these notes please.) G) List that per CUZ-2 requirements, should this site employ 50 or more people, an emergency evacuation plan shall be designed and implemented with the Tucson Fire Department's review and approval. 5. Depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. I AM WILLING TO MEET AT THE COUNTER OR IN A PRIVATE APPOINTMENT TO REVIEW THE CORRECTIONS REQUESTED. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06CM02271 155 w valencia 3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 04/16/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
| 04/17/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include locations and inside dimensions of canopy tree planters within vehicle use area on the landscape plan. A minimum of 4' in width must be provided for each canopy tree. The measurement is always within the planter area and does not include any material which defines the outer edge of the unpaved area per DS 2-06.3.3.C. Some planters are not included on the plan and one appears not to meet minimum width requirements, revise as necessary. 2. If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15. The height of screening material adjacent to property lines is measured on the project side of the screen, at finish grade per DS 2-06.3.7.A.1. Verify if wall is located on site. |
| 04/18/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 18, 2007 SUBJECT: Retail Store Site Plan- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Philip Veneriano LOCATION: 155 W Valencia, T14S R13E Sec24, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM02271 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan, Stormwater Detention/Retention Report and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The site plan is not approved at this time. The following comments must be addressed prior to site plan approval: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Revise the site plan to show the buildings finished floor elevation (FFE) and any attached appliances elevated a minimum of one foot above the calculated base flood elevation for the proposed basin. Currently the site plan only shows the FFE elevated 0.5-feet above the calculated base flood elevation. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide the Structural Design for Enclosure Wall detail on Sheet C-2 as called out for the refuse container on Sheet C-1. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.12: Provide a detail with dimensions for the 42-inch handrails that are used at the pedestrian circulation points. All Handrails must satisfy the requirements within DS Sec.2-08 and ANSI. GRADING PLAN: 4) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project. Submit a copy of the Grading Plan with the grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent Grading Plan comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans 5) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Site Plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 6) Provide a general grading note-specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 7) DS Sec.10-01.5.2.6: Be advised that the Grading Plan must accurately reflect the proposed detention/retention basin design and dimensions as called out on the proposed site plan and drainage report. Provide these details on the Grading Plan and label the details according to the requirements and dimensions of the drainage report. 8) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.7: Provide a General Note referencing the Terracon Geotechnical Report, provide the name, address, job number, date, and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the report. State that the grading plan shall comply with recommendations within the report as well as any subsequent geotechnical addenda. 9) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submittal will be reviewed with the grading plan permit application. Further comments may be generated upon submittal of the grading plan permit application. For further information, visit: www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that address the comments provided above. A grading plan permit application needs to be submitted at this time. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Due to the comments generated on this review I am willing to meet at the counter for review and possible approval of this site plan as long as all comments have been accurately addressed. Any major changes due to other City Department reviews might require resubmittal of the entire site plan, if applicable. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/08/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |