Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM02271
Parcel: 13819029B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW

Permit Number - T06CM02271
Review Name: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/28/2006 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need to review location /method of connection to public sewer with 5th floor maps & records- 740-6602 or 740-6606
12/29/2006 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning has denied the site plan for this development. Zoning will review the building plans upon approval of the site plan and can review the building plans at the counter.
12/29/2006 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Needs Review
12/29/2006 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
12/29/2006 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 22, 2006
SUBJECT: Retail Store- 2nd- Site Plan Review
TO: Philip Veneriano
LOCATION: 155 W Valencia, T14S R13E Sec24, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T06CM02271


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan, Stormwater Detention/Retention Report and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The site plan is not approved at this time. The following comments must be addressed prior to site plan approval:

DRAINAGE REPORT:

1) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.C: The proposed site plan must match the post-development plan (Fig 6) in the submitted drainage report. All stormwater conveyance systems that are proposed on the site plan must be described and presented in detail with all hydraulic calculation sheets. Specifically provide a discussion on both HDPE pipes proposed under the pedestrian circulation paths. Provide calculations that show the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk areas.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide cross-sections showing basin details (slopes, depth of flow, setbacks from property lines) and all inlet and outlet structures associated with the basin.

3) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Either provide separately, or show a conceptual grading plan on the Site Plan, with the resubmittal of the Site Plan and re-submittal of the Drainage Report. The conceptual grading plan is required on this project due to the detention basin with the proximity to building setbacks. A Geotechnical Report is required. The soils report needs to discuss suitability and feasibility of the project. Description of existing soil constraints for the site, structural design recommendations, pavement design section, and other typical geotechnical data is needed. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, provide proposed recommendations for setbacks from building to drainage areas include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales, and provide infiltration test results. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Recommendations need to be incorporated into the conceptual grading plan, Site Plan, and Drainage Report.

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.2: Provide the property description (legal description, Subdivision Plat Map with Book and Page) on the project location map located on Sheet G1.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Identify conditions within the square mile area shown on the project location map located on Sheet G1, such as subdivisions, major streets, and major watercourses. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. The location map must be to scale 1-inch is equal to 3 miles.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Provide the basis of bearing used for the lot dimensions and bearings. Basis of Bearing is required prior to site plan approval.

7) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.12: Provide vehicular circulation, clearly identified on the site plan. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2 for Vehicular Use Are design and circulation. Specifically the revised site plan has proposed 2 new parking spaces along the south side of the storage area. Provide a back-up spur at the end of the row of parking with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, 3-foot radii, and a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced area. Label all dimensions for both proposed back-up spurs.

8) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.14: Provide maneuvering area(s) on site plan for the proposed loading space. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii.

9) DS.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to reflect the 150-foot Major Streets and Routes Plan right-of-way for Valencia Road. The proposed site plan shows a 60-foot half right-of-way width.

10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Provide recording information for the existing right-of-ways for Valencia Road and Missiondale Road. Recordation information is required prior to site plan approval.

11) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from the street monument lines to the existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines.

12) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.23: Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. Spot elevations are required to verify that on-site storm water runoff is collected into the proposed basins and that ponding on site will not occur.

13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: The revised site plan relocated the refuse containers. Provide a detail for container area labeling and showing the dimensions for refuse container, show or label gates or doors for trash enclosures. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Show maneuverability for refuse vehicles in plan view. Provide turning radius labeled on the site plan to show that collection vehicles can maneuver onsite.

14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Provide on the site plan all information associated with the drainage report. The following information must be indicated on the site plan:
a) Show the areas of detention including the 100-year floodplain and ponding limits with labeled water surface elevations within the basins;
b) Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension any proposed scuppers that are used for the pedestrian circulation path through the proposed detention basin and at the sidewalks adjacent to the building. Proposed scuppers under all sidewalks will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a Drainage Report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under all sidewalks;
c) Indicate proposed ground elevations at different points on the lot, both onsite and offsite, to provide reference to future site drainage. Specifically along the PAAL and any scupper location at the basin;

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Provide a copy of the Terracon Geotechnical Report that is referenced in the Drainage Report under the Detention/Retention Details Section. The geotechnical report must address the following:

15) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: The geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following:
a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin.
b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development.
c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes.
d) Provide infiltration rates for the retention requirements of the 5-year storm showing that the maximum disposal time of 12-hours is met.

GRADING PLAN:

16) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project. Submit a copy of the Grading Plan with the grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent Grading Plan comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans

17) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Site Plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf

18) Provide a general grading note-specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements).

19) DS Sec.10-01.5.2.6: Be advised that the Grading Plan must accurately reflect the proposed detention/retention basin design and dimensions as called out on the proposed site plan and drainage report. Provide these details on the Grading Plan and label the details according to the requirements and dimensions of the drainage report.

20) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.7: Provide a General Note referencing the Terracon Geotechnical Report, provide the name, address, job number, date, and phone numbers of the firms or individuals who prepared the report. State that the grading plan shall comply with recommendations within the report as well as any subsequent geotechnical addenda.

21) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submittal will be reviewed with the grading plan permit application. Further comments may be generated upon submittal of the grading plan permit application. For further information, visit:
www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan, revised drainage report, the referenced geotechnical report and a revised landscape plan that address the comments provided above. A grading plan permit application needs to be submitted at this time. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, drainage report, geotechnical report, and landscape plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference.

For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/29/2006 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed