Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0151
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/31/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department has completed our review of the second Development Plan submittal for the Sterling / Tyndall Avenue facility. The number of compactors proposed for the trash room was clarified to be two - one compactor for solid waste and one compactor for recycling materials. The waste stream calculations were reviewed and found to be correct. The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department approves the proposed solid waste management plans for the Sterling / Tyndall Avenue facility. Please call me at 837-3713 if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 11/02/2016 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | I can approve the attached plans. Please check to be sure these are the ones that get approved. Gary |
| 11/04/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP16-0151 Sterling - Tyndall Avenue / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 11/18/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/18/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Sterling Tyndall Avenue - Group Dwelling (Student Housing) Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0151 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2016 DUE DATE: November 29, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 23, 2017. 1. 2-06.4.2.B - This comment was not addressed. The legal description is not provided on sheets 1 - 16. COMMENT: Include in the legal description within title block of all plans sheets the words "A Portion of Lot 1". 2. 2-06.4.2.C - This comment was not correctly addressed. The eastern sections should be 5, 8 & 17COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map, see cover sheet. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a general note that meets the above requirements. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. If the design professional is to review the DP for compliance with the Main Gate criteria in addition to the Zoning review, include any changes DP that are required by the Design Professional. 4. 2-06.4.8.B - Until a building plan is submitted this comment will remain open and the development package cannot be approved. COMMENT: If applicable draw, label, and dimension any easements on the property. Indicate whether a cross access easement or agreement is to be recorded for access to the site. 5. Provide a copy of the required Main Gate 207 waiver with the next submittal. 6. Zoning cannot approve the plans until approved by the Design Professional. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/18/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Sterling Tyndall Avenue - Group Dwelling (Student Housing) Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0151 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2016 DUE DATE: November 29, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 23, 2017. 1. 2-06.4.2.B - This comment was not addressed. The legal description is not provided on sheets 1 - 16. COMMENT: Include in the legal description within title block of all plans sheets the words "A Portion of Lot 1". 2. 2-06.4.2.C - This comment was not correctly addressed. The eastern sections should be 5, 8 & 17COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map, see cover sheet. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a general note that meets the above requirements. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. If the design professional is to review the DP for compliance with the Main Gate criteria in addition to the Zoning review, include any changes DP that are required by the Design Professional. 4. 2-06.4.8.B - Until a building plan is submitted this comment will remain open and the development package cannot be approved. COMMENT: If applicable draw, label, and dimension any easements on the property. Indicate whether a cross access easement or agreement is to be recorded for access to the site. 5. Provide a copy of the required Main Gate 207 waiver with the next submittal. 6. Zoning cannot approve the plans until approved by the Design Professional. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/21/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/23/2016 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | The Design Review Package dated November 9th, 2016, has been APPROVED with the following conditions. Prior to the next submittal the IID conditions are to be added to the cover sheet. 1. The red accent feature that wraps around the entire building (the "Red Strip") as a key design element, shall be constructed of one material. The applicant or its successor will repaint the red accent strip every seven (7) years, or as otherwise reasonably required to remedy significant color fading of the accent strip. 2. The applicant will work towards an agreement with the Islamic Center (ICT) of Tucson to memorialize any terms agreed to by the parties. 3. The applicant shall present/provide an updated graphic of the rooftop design which retains the transition buffers between the rooftop amenity area and the building edges, especially on the Project's north edge facing the ICT. 4. The applicant shall submit a project Communications Plan ("Plan"). The Plan shall describes how the applicant or its successor property owner or its managing team will provide Project's neighbors (such as: ICT, West University Neighborhood Association, and the Marshall Foundation) the primary contact persons for the Project, both during construction and management. |
| 11/25/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. LANDSCAPING Mail Gate District Development Obtain approval by the City Engineer or designee that proposed landscape within the City of Tucson R.O.W complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; Provide written approval for landscape within ROW. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 11/28/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0151 Sterling-Tyndall Avenue 11/28/2016 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Denied () Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 11/28/2016 DP16-0151 is currently being reviewed for Sterling-Tyndall Avenue, B-2.d.5 states that applicants shall meet with the DRC or Design Professional (as the case may be) to discuss the project and its compliance with the MGD design requirements as required by the Design Professional. Within fifteen days following the final such meeting, the Design Professional shall provide a written report to the applicant, the DRC stating whether the proposal complies with the MGD design standards, making recommendations on any modifications to the project needed to bring it into compliance with the MGD design standards, and (in the Design Professional's discretion) commenting on other aspects of the project. The applicant shall include the Design Professional's communication in the development package submitted under Section B-2.a. Please submit required DRC letter for plan review. |
| 11/28/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/01/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/01/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |