Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0126-00008
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/27/2026 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P26AD00194 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 03/05/262026 Yes 1 David Wilging : DSD Addressing The original building on this site will be designated as building 1, the new structure being built on this development plan will be designated as building 2. General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 03/31/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 29, 2026 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0126-00008, 1st Submittal, Faribault Foods WWTP Expansion / 8755 S Rita Rd, Tucson, AZ. 85747, Received March 4, 2026 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0126-00008, 1st Submittal, a development plan for the expansion of an existing perishable goods use at 8755 S Rita Rd. This development is located in the N.E. quarter of the S.W. quarter of Section 27, Township 15S, Range 15E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 141-22-004L, covers approximately 85.38 ± acres, and is zoned as Heavy Industrial Zone (I-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is South Rita Road and Interstate 10, approximately 4,800 feet to the southwest of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. Below are the responses that the FAA Notice Criteria Tool provided on the applicant’s project. 1) Based on the information you provided, you are required to file notice with the FAA. You must submit notice at least 45 days before the start of the proposed construction or alteration or the date an application for a construction permit is filed, whichever is earliest. 2) Note: If you propose construction or alteration that is subject to the licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), you must submit notice to the FAA on or before the date that an application is filed with the FCC. Visit FCC Licensing to learn more. The Tucson Airport Authority is requiring a resubmittal of this project. The below conditions of approval must be added into the revised notes of the development plan. Conditions of approval: 1. “The applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp” Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 4.4 miles east of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Land Use 26. 1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning cc file |
||
| 03/05/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0126-00008 (1st Review) Project: Proposed wastewater pretreatment facility expansion at the Faribault Foods Location: 8755 S RITA RD Review Date: 3/5/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Related Cases TP-PRE-1125-00238 *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0126-00008, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.1 3. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.3 4. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” AM 2-06.4.7.C.2 5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” AM 2-06.4.7.D 6. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to the proposed basin (Includes water harvesting basins) and the stormwater chambers on the grading plan. Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appear too narrow for such details. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. retention volume, cubic feet; d. d. first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; (It is understood these values do not account towards drainage requirements for the underground chambers, this is for documentation) e. Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3. 7. Provide a call-out or add to the detail of the swale, the swale surface treatment proposed – this could be hand placed riprap, earthen, etc 8. Update Table for drainage area flow summary on page 10 of the plan set to coincide with table 1 (PG 10) of the drainage report. 9. It is recommended that the basin proposed be narrowed and lengthened to ensure compliance with setbacks relating to the storage tanks and Treatment Area. The minimum setback is 10-ft and the measurements currently show around 7’6” which is why the recommendation is to maintain the same storage value but alter the basin layout. DSSDR 4.14.1.2 & 5.3.1.11.d FOR PERMIT RESUBMISSION, IT IS REQUIRED THAT: Corrected/Revised Plan set and a detailed response letter document that clearly shows how you addressed all of Site Engineering’s and other reviewers’ comments for the completed review cycle. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/27/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: PROPOSED WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION AT THE FARIBAULT FOODS, INC (ARIZONA CANNING COMPANY, LLC) ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0126-00008 ADDRESS: 8755 S RITA RD ZONING: I-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONE 03.27.2026 THE COMMENTS PROVIDED ARE PRELIMINARY AND ARE NOT TO BE ASSUMED AS A COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL. DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW PROCESS, A FULL REVIEW WILL BE MADE BY THE SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO REVIEW SECTION TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS AND RAINWATER HARVESTING. PRE-APPLICATION COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED: 1. UDC 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this section apply to the following: A. All new development; and, B. Expansion of existing development, as provided below: 1. Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building (s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. **IF ZONING REQUIRES ADDITIONAL PARKING TO MEET SITE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE PARKING AREA INCLUDES 4 OR MORE PARKING SPACES THEN CANOPY TREES WILL BE REQUIRED. SEE UDC 7.6.4.B -- PARKING LOT CANOPY TREES ARE REQUIRED AT 1 TREE FOR EVERY 4 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. STRUCTURALLY COVERED PARKING SPACES DO NOT COUNT TOWARD THE RATIO, SEE UDC 7.6.4.B.1.C.(8). TREES ARE TO BE DISTRIBUTED EVENLY THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA, SEE UDC 7.6.4.1.A.(1). SEE TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL 5-01.3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING IN VEHICULAR USE AREA REQUIREMENTS. ANY PLANT MATERIAL PROVIDED TO MEET THE PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENT WILL ALSO REQUIRE IRRIGATION. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS: 2. Per Site Zoning requirements, parking is required for the proposed WW treatment facility. *Include a landscape plan set that includes a planting plan, irrigation plan, 6” depressed landscape area for the required trees and all applicable detailing required for construction. If the new parking area is concrete or asphalt, then please grade the area toward the curbed tree planter islands and provide curb cut inlets and outlets. *If an example landscape plan set is needed for reference, please let me know and I can provide a set. Or consult with a licensed landscape architect to prepare the plan set. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 03/26/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Krista Hansen – Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Faribault Foods, Inc Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0126-00008 (8755 S RITA RD – I-2) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/26/2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 3, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Please provide the information as stated in the standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0126-00008, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Provide the reference case numbers on the cover sheet: C9-00-23, C10-00-73, C10-09-05, and D09-0001. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – On the cover sheet, list the following under Site Notes / Project Land Use: “Perishable Goods Manufacturing subject to UDC 4.9.5.C.1-8, 4.9.5.E.1-2 and 4.9.13.Q.” 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Add the following General Notes to the cover sheet: a. “This site has been designed to comply with the requirements/standards of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone, UDC Section 5.6.” b. “This site has been designed to comply with the requirements/standards of the Major Streets and Routes, UDC Section 5.4.” c. Provide Rezoning conditions for Case C9-00-23 (see D09-0001) d. Provide Board of Adjustment Variance conditions for Cases C10-00-73, C10-09-05 (see D09-0001) 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B.1 – As a General Note, add the information as stated in the standard above. 2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B.3 – As a General Note, add the information as stated in the standard above. 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.C.2 – As a General Note, add the information as stated in the standard above. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.D – As a General Note, add the information as stated in the standard above. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B –Provide the information as stated in the standard above (see D09-0001). 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – On the site plan, add the zoning classifications of the adjacent parcels. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 11. COMMENT: Provide the following information for Rita Rd, as listed in the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Variance Case C10-09-05, reduced the number of required parking spaces for the warehouse expansion area only. Parking is required for the proposed WW treatment facility. a. Motor vehicle parking calculations are incorrect. Recalculate using the “Industrial Use Group" in UDC Table 7.4.4-1. In the table, list the “required” and “provided” number of parking spaces for the existing site and for the proposed expansion. b. Show all proposed motor vehicle parking spaces, fully dimensioned, for the WW treatment facility only. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Variance Case C10-09-05, reduced the number of required parking spaces for the warehouse expansion area only. Bicycle parking is required for the proposed WW treatment facility. a. Bicycle parking calculations are incorrect. Recalculate using the “Industrial Use Group" in UDC Table 7.4.8-1. In the table, list the “required” and “provided” number of parking spaces for the existing site and for the proposed expansion. b. Indicated on the site plan where the long-term bicycle parking will be located for the proposed WW treatment facility. c. Remove “Class One” and “Class Two” under Bicycle Parking. Use “Short-term” and “Long-term” bicycle parking categories. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of all existing and proposed structures within the footprint of the building(s). 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the information at listed in the standard above. Using the dimensions on the site plan, the proposed structure is approximately 4,753 sq ft. Add the square footage of the proposed structure to the Site Development Notes table on the cover sheet. The table shows a building expansion of 1,710 sq ft (existing building footprint: 496,517 and with proposed expansion: 498,227 sq ft). Correct table or clarify the discrepancy. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Dimension the access road adjacent to the pedestrian path and indicate if it is one or two-way travel. Ensure path meets the design criteria in the TSM. If you decide to remove it, provide a note stating that pedestrian circulation is exempt through TSM 7-01.3.3.B.2. 16. COMMENT: Update the Site Development Notes table on the cover sheet to ensure the information is clear, correct, and up to date. a. Show what is “required” and what is “provided” for both the “existing” and “proposed” development. b. In addition to the parking calculations, the loading area requirements are based on outdated code. See UDC Table 7.5.5-A for loading area requirements. c. Ensure the correct proposed GFA was used for the expansion calculation. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Krista Hansen at Krista.hansen@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 03/04/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, TAA, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing TAA, ADOT, and TEP. FYI, email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 03/12/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/25/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT has no comments. | ||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Approved Regarding TD-DEV-0126-00008, The City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no additional requirements for the Project and no further reviews by TPRD are required. Description: wastewater pretreatment facility expansion at the Faribault Foods Main Address: 8755 S RITA RD TUCSON 85747 Parcel: 14122004L Regards, Joe Barr Project Manager Tucson Parks and Recreation 520-307-2811 |
||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/25/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | March 24, 2026 WO#T178258 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CRDC Admin Team Dear CRDC Admin Team Subject: FARIBAULT FOODS WWTP EXPANSION TD-DEV-0126-00008 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 3/4/2026. There are no existing facilities within the development.There does not appear to be any TEP facilities within the new construction boundaries Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Cruz Vega (520) 349-9850 cruzvega@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/25/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/04/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/19/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |