Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0126-00008
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P26AD00194 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 03/05/262026 Yes 1 David Wilging : DSD Addressing The original building on this site will be designated as building 1, the new structure being built on this development plan will be designated as building 2. General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 03/05/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0126-00008 (1st Review) Project: Proposed wastewater pretreatment facility expansion at the Faribault Foods Location: 8755 S RITA RD Review Date: 3/5/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Related Cases TP-PRE-1125-00238 *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0126-00008, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.1 3. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.3 4. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” AM 2-06.4.7.C.2 5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” AM 2-06.4.7.D 6. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to the proposed basin (Includes water harvesting basins) and the stormwater chambers on the grading plan. Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appear too narrow for such details. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. retention volume, cubic feet; d. d. first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; (It is understood these values do not account towards drainage requirements for the underground chambers, this is for documentation) e. Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3. 7. Provide a call-out or add to the detail of the swale, the swale surface treatment proposed – this could be hand placed riprap, earthen, etc 8. Update Table for drainage area flow summary on page 10 of the plan set to coincide with table 1 (PG 10) of the drainage report. 9. It is recommended that the basin proposed be narrowed and lengthened to ensure compliance with setbacks relating to the storage tanks and Treatment Area. The minimum setback is 10-ft and the measurements currently show around 7’6” which is why the recommendation is to maintain the same storage value but alter the basin layout. DSSDR 4.14.1.2 & 5.3.1.11.d FOR PERMIT RESUBMISSION, IT IS REQUIRED THAT: Corrected/Revised Plan set and a detailed response letter document that clearly shows how you addressed all of Site Engineering’s and other reviewers’ comments for the completed review cycle. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/04/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, TAA, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing TAA, ADOT, and TEP. FYI, email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 03/12/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Approved Regarding TD-DEV-0126-00008, The City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no additional requirements for the Project and no further reviews by TPRD are required. Description: wastewater pretreatment facility expansion at the Faribault Foods Main Address: 8755 S RITA RD TUCSON 85747 Parcel: 14122004L Regards, Joe Barr Project Manager Tucson Parks and Recreation 520-307-2811 |
||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/05/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/04/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |