Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T21CM06867
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2022 | DBENOIT1 | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM06867 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Please forward your code modification request to the building official for approval. Once the building official makes a ruling on the code modification request, please submit all approval paperwork and project will be approved at that time. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied A report is required before mechanical can provide clearance it can not be a deferred submittal due to the nature of the hazard's. It was stated in your earlier response that you were going to provide the report thru Ino-tek that I still have not received Not Complied ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Third Plumbing Review: 1thru 14 OK 15). SAME-What Will the S2 Sink in Chem lab & the battery area scrubber be discharging to the sanitary system? will these items or any other fixtures/drains be discharging harmful substances to the drainage system that will require an interceptor? _IPC 1003.1 _** RESPONSE SHEET DIDN'T RESPOND ABOUT THE S2 SINK**SEE PLAN PAGE p1.2 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/21/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Here are the requests we have regarding the documentation provided: Hazardous Materials Management Plan- shows as a deferred submittal Hazardous materials Inventory Statement- need updated and accurate HMIS to reflect actual on site hazmat in accordance with details in IFC 5001.5.2. Provide documentation referenced- ATEX certification, SIL-2 documents, Process Hazard Analysis (PHA)[specifically for EtO/N2 mixture], and Data sheet 1-44 referenced on Hazardous Materials Opinion Report item 20 on Damage Limiting Construction Required Operational permits- TBD HMOR document states non-flammable mixture of EtO and N2 in all chamber areas (H-3 designated), documentation is limited in explanation of this. Need SDS for all hazardous materials listed in HMIS. While reviewing the IBC, the code modification request and subsequent denial these are the findings: Modification request 1 notes that there is a non-flammable mixture of EtO and N2, if such what is the reactivity profile for this (Cameo Chemicals has "No data" in most sections). Does this meet need for H-3 classification if below reactivity? MAQ for Unstable(Reactive) 2 is 50lbs, process notes state 100lbs in use, Does this reduce the reactivity to a class 1 where the MAQ is not limited? Modification request 2 meets performance based design (IFC 5001.3.3) pending the Process Hazard Analysis (not provided) outcome given the deluge system, gas detection system, more than 25% of wall space is exterior wall, and materials are stored in 400lb DOT approved drums. Fire protection rating between other building areas is 3-hour rated vs required 2 hour rating. All under the standards of NFPA 55 Ch. 14. Modification request from TFD standpoint meets criteria for Performance Based Alternative Methods as long as all other requested information is provided to TFD. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |