Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T21CM01420
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2021 | JGARCIA1 | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide Structural, Architectural, and Electrical drawings prepared by a professional registrant for any ans all modifications associated with the installation of the ATM machines. |
| 03/03/2021 | JGARCIA1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide Structural, Architectural, and Electrical drawings prepared by a professional registrant for any ans all modifications associated with the installation of the ATM machines. |
| 03/11/2021 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/06/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM01420 947 N Park Ave Chase Bank Tenant Improvement TRANSMITTAL: April 6, 2021 This site is located in the C-1 zone (UDC 4.7.20). Financial Service is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.L.1 & .3 and 4.9.13.O. 1. As modification to the exterior of the building is proposed Design Review is required per Main Gate overlay Section B-2.d. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 04/07/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: April 7, 2021 FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992) COT On-Call Design Professional RE: Submittal T21CM01420, Chase Bank in Aspire 2 I have reviewed the Main Gate District Submittal Package for Chase Bank in the Aspire 2 Building submitted April 2021 for the purpose of determining its conformance with the Submittal Requirements of the MGD. I have checked the submittal against the Requirements in the UDC Article 5.12. Submittal Requirements Status 1. Identify proposal and why review is required. N/A Tenant (land split, minor subdivision, major subdivision, Improvement in compliance with HDZ, change of existing existing building development plan, new development plan, condition of annexation or rezoning) 2. Identify any existing case numbers N/A T.I. In existing associated with the property. (Rezoning, building shell Subdivisions, Board of Adjustment, etc.) Provide supporting documentation, rezoning conditions, etc. Complete 3. Provide a copy of existing approved Site (with Pre-submittal Plan, Development Plan/Package or Tentative Plat documents) for re-subdivisions. 4. If new plan, place a north arrow on it with Complied correct scale. 5. Provide the address, parcel number, N/A Tenant location of the property or a map to identify the subject lot. (A copy of the Plat Map from the Pima County Assessor’s Office will help.) 6. Identify the last approved use for the Use unchanged, this is property and the proposed use(s). an existing tenant 7. Show existing/proposed property lines, lots, Complete dimensions, and total square footage of each. 8. If no plan is on file, new plan should show Part of Shell the existing building(s), proposed expansion(s) Submittal (N/A) if applicable, gross floor area, and distance to all property lines for each structure. 9. Identify the height of each new structure N/A and/or expansion. 10. If your project is a bar, social organization, N/A worship use, civic use, or restaurant, provide a fully dimensioned floor plan, identifying the use of each area or room. 11. Identify the existing zoning on the property, Part of shell approval and adjacent zoning in all directions. 12. Provide height of outside walls closest to Part of shell approval property lines of all existing/proposed buildings. 13. Show existing & proposed, dimensioned: Complete parking spaces, driveways, site entrance/exit points. 14. Show refuse collection provisions with Part of Shell approval adequate ingress/egress. plan 15. Identify pavement, curb, and sidewalk Complete locations for all property frontages in the public Right Of Way (ROW). 16. Show existing/proposed landscaping, fences, Shown on Shell plans walls, and current/future ROW. 17. Indicate Federal Emergency Management Area N/A part of Shell (FEMA) or city Flood Hazard designated areas. 18. Show proposed location of new sewer lines and N/A part of shell connections to main. General Comments 1. Parking in the shell building reserved for Chase Bank indicated in Submittal. 2. Car stacking addressed beyond 3 stacked spaces. Signage indicates to keep the sidewalk clear 3. Double to single Storefront... I see no problem with this alteration or the elevations in general. 2. Consideration of Shell Building drop off/pick-up and circulation between vehicles and pedestrian relative to the drive-through teller service has been taken into consideration. Information of flow patterns and how potential safety conflicts may be eliminated has been adequately indicated. I recommend approval as submitted. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez, Architect RGA |
| 04/09/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2021 | IMONSHI1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |