Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T19CM05218
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Fire pump room requires fire rated access Correctly label Fire Command Center- page.A00.810 Clearly indicate emergency lighting throughout |
| 08/14/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the domestic water supply to the building with the civil engineers. The current site plan shows a 4" water meter and 6" domestic water line entering the building off 1st Street. 2. Provide the proposed water demand and fixture count for the building to verify the size of the water meter. |
| 08/14/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T19CM05218 - Residential Use Group / Student Housing Building Plan Review (1st Review) Related to DP19-0059 MGD-19-01/T19SA00088 947 N. Park Avenue - C-1 to UC-1 Zoning (Maingate) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 14, 2019 DUE DATE: August 23, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the Building plans for compliance with the approved development package. While the building plans are consistent with the approved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. In addition, the plans must be reviewed by Staff and the Design Professional for compliance with the Maingate regulations and conditions of the MGD-19-01 application and PDP. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any revisions made to the building plans do not affect zoning requirements. 3. COMMENT: Once the plans have been approved by the Design Professional, 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers and no site changes are made that affect zoning requirements, zoning will stamp and sign the building plans as it pertains to the zoning review purview. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 08/22/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T19CM05218 1) Engineering can approve the building plans after all outstanding commercial and 3rd party reviews have been complete 2) Coordinate with Development Plan. Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways or. Reference TSM 7-01.4.1.E John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 10/21/2019 | PMARTIN1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 10/18/19 - Review by Design Professional Rick Gonzalez: Aspire CD Elevations vs. Approved Design Elevations DP Review: SOUTH ELEVATION: A09.004 - redline review on attachment • Base level left of column line 2: 2 windows missing •Base level between column lines 4 and 4.4: 2 windows missing • Left of column line 2: relocated windows and changed heights WEST ELEVATION: A09.003 - redline review on attachment • Double door changed to single door near column line F. • Vertical windows at column line e.7: changed from double frame windows to single • Windows at column line H missing at levels 8 and 8M. • At panel i7 - g.9 - design shows 3 windows between levels 02-08; only 2 per level shown on C.D. NORTH ELEVATION: A09.002 - redline review on attachment • Location of vertical red band changed • Double frame windows split into single windows. • At levels 08 and 08M on column line 4 – changed to single frame windows. • Windows between column lines 7 and 8 changed from double frame to single. EAST ELEVATION: A09.001 - redline review on attachment • Panel between level 08 and the roof: at column line J, added two windows and changed locations. • Panel between levels 02-07, added windows and changed locations of windows • Banded panel between column line H and G and levels 2-7 changed locations of windows • At column line E and levels 01-02: double frame windows missing. |
| 12/26/2019 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/26/2019 | PMARTIN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |