Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T13CM01441
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/18/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | NSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM01441 6200 S Campbell Avenue Apartment Complex - New Guard House along the Campbell Avenue Entrance TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 18, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building / site plan for the proposed guard house at the Campbell Avenue entrance but cannot approve the plans at this time. Address the following zoning comments and re-submit for review if possible for approval. 2. Label the setback of the Campbell Avenue existing and future face of curb location to the new guard house. 3. Per UDC section 6.6.3.B - Detached accessory buildings are not permitted in the buildable area extending the full width of the lot between the principal building and the front street lot line, except for terraces and steps not over three feet high above the natural grade, paved areas, and fences or walls. It is not clear on the site plan or detail drawings on the plan where the principal structures i.e. apartments are located from the existing or future curb location. Label the building setback from the closest building to the property line and label the distance from the face of the closest building to the existing and future curb location. If the accessory structure (Guard House) closer to the property line than any of the principal structures relocate the guard to be in line with the principal structures or farther back than the principal structure. 4. The zoning comments are minor and can be reviewed over the counter once the corrections have been made and assuming that all other review agencies' comments have also been addressed. If the site must be revised the site plan sheets will have to be re-stamped by all review agencies that have already approved the gated entries. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/19/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | RAPID ENTRY CAPABILITIES REQUIRED-KEY SWITCH or STROBE |
| 03/27/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS-1; CODE SUMMARY: CURRENT CODES ENFORCED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON INCLUDE THE 2012 IBC, IMC, IPC, AND IFC, THE 2011 NEC, AND THE 2009 ICC/ANSI. REVISE AND VERIFY THIS SUBMITTAL MEETS THOSE CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2. SHEET AS-2; KEYNOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A-1; KEYNOTES: SEVERAL NOTES INDICATE TO "SEE STRUCTURAL". THE STRUCTURAL PLANS AND DETAILS IN THE CALCULATIONS MUST BE ON FULL SIZE SHEETS. PROVIDE AND CUT SECTIONS ON THE PLANS. 4. SHEET A-1; PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTES 7, 8, 9, AND 10 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A-2; KEYNOTES: NOTES 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, AND 10 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 6. GENERAL: ADD MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS TO THE FULL SIZE SHEETS (CONCRETE, MASONRY, REINFORCING, MORTAR, GROUT, SOILS, ETC.). 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOOTING (SEE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET 10). 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL NOT BE MADE UNTIL RESPONSES ARE RECEIVED. |
| 04/01/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM01441 6200 S Campbell New Guardhouse and Gate Entry 1. All Commercial Submittals to be minimum 3/32" text size both upper and lower case, referring to sheets E1 and E4. Cannot read panels schedules on E4. 2. Indicate if fixtures A and B sheet E1 Full Cut Off or Unshielded ? Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review DSD, Tucson, 4/1/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |