Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T10CM00917
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2010 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Please provide a comment letter describing how each comment has been addressed. Provide the following data on the site plans. Comments based on OC201. Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements. The new hydrant is too far from the back of the elephant house and the the Ranger Station if it is not sprinklered. The distance is measured around the buiding. Not as the crow flies. |
| 07/12/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2010 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/13/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Reid Park Zoo Elephant Exhibit T10CM00917 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2010 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t10cm00802.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 07/16/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/23/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/23/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed; drawings remain unchanged. Show how locating a floor sink (P-12, installed per detail 220) along with a floor-mounted condensate drain pipe in the service entrance area walkway will not interfere with access to the LSS equipment area. Reference: Section 309.0, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved; the proposed design establishes a direct connection between the potable water and the sewer-connected waste which is not allowed per Section 603.3.5, UPC 2006. Provide air-gap separation between the potable water supply and the flushing header, the manual water make-up, and the float-operated water fill in the settling chamber. Reference: Section 603.3.5, UPC 2006. |
| 07/23/2010 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/06/2010 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/10/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |