Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM00182
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | 1. PREVIOUS NOTES 2 AND 3 DID NOT GET RESOLVED. PLEASE ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES. |
| 03/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Correct the size of the new rain leader shown on sheet P102. An 8" rain leader is being connected to a new 12" rain leader at column line G,-4. Reference: Sections 311.5 and 316.4.1, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved. Clarify how the roof drains and overflow roof drains along column lines E, J, L, and Q, are accommodating different roof areas. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Sheet C1 (grading and drainage plan) cannot be approved because it is labeled as "Preliminary - Not For Construction". 4. Provide cleanouts for each rain drain service lateral (detail 9/C501). Reference: Sections 707.4 and 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. 5. The maximum distance between a cleanout and a manhole in a storm sewer shall be 100 feet. Reference: Sections 719.2, 719.4, and 1101.12.1, UPC 2006. 6. Revise the size and slope of the storm sewer per Section 1106.2, UPC 2006 or provide calculations to show that the design of the storm sewer can accommodate the water flow from a storm with a 60-minute duration and a 100-year return period (0.031 GPM/ square foot of projected roof area). |
| 03/24/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/24/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/27/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/03/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |