Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM03164
Parcel: 12213035B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T05CM03164
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/21/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/22/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Show how the water supply system has been modified to serve the new evaporative cooler. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
07/22/2005 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
07/22/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Erasable entries (i.e. pencil) are not acceptable on drawings submitted for review.
2. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference Section 803.2.8, IECC 2000.
3. Provide information to show that the manufacturer has listed the heat pump for use with the specified air handler. Reference Section 304.1, IMC 2000.
4. Coordinate the electrical requirements for the heat pumps and air handlers based on the manufacturer's listing requirements. Reference Section 304.1, IMC 2000.
5. Provide clearance space for maintenance and replacement of the new air handlers on the equipment platform. Reference Section 306.1 IMC.
6. Show the size, routing, and termination of the drain from the evaporative cooler. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2000 and Section 807.2, UPC 1994.
7. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2000 and Section 807.2, UPC 1994.
8. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for the air handlers units. Reference Section 307.2.3 IMC.
9. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference Section 401, IMC 2000.
10. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference Section 606.1, IMC.
11. Clarify the location of the duct from EC-1; show how it is supported if it is not located under the roof. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
12. Clarify the airflow quantities for the air handlers. The supply air flow appear to be greater than the return air flow and the specified air flows for the air handlers. Show the air flows associated with the four air devices located between AH-3 and AH-4. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
08/03/2005 RAUL PALMA BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/10/2005 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Passed
08/15/2005 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Applicant shall go to Pima County Addressing to obtain addresses for all new/relocated meters. Take such addresses to DSD Permit Clerks for data entry into the City permitting system. Addresses for all new meters as shown on the plans shall correspond to those in City/County database.
2. It appears that the distance from the service to existing panels 111B and 115 is aprox. 115 LF. Even allowing 50 LF from the TEP transformer to the actual service entrance for the (4) paralleled 600 MCM, the AFC appears to exceed 10,000A. Also note that any existing panels which may be located in Suites 119, 121, 122, and 123 may be subject to higher levels of fault current than that of the original installation as the (2) 500 MCM overhead service is changed out for a (4) 600 MCM underground. In the past the City has allowed the use of current limiting OCPDs to attenuate fault current at existing panels to preclude the necessity of purchasing all new panels with a service upgrade; this would depend on the exact location of such panels, and what the possible extent of hazard and damage would be. Specification of a series-rated system would also be acceptable. Willing to discuss.
3. Mechanical equipment is specified at 230V on Sheet 3. Please verify that such equipment is also available for 208V, and coordinate with Mechanical for consistency on plans. See Mechanical Comment #4.
4. On Sheet E2, Power Plan, correct circuit designation "115-22" to read "115-20" and "115-24" to read "115-22."
5. Specify that the N-G bond be 250 MCM for the new 1200A disconnect enclosure. Reference NEC 250.24 (B), and NEC Table 8.
08/17/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the vehicle parking calculation provided to state the land use classification for each tenant as noted in the vehicle parking requirements LUC Sec. 3.3.4 (e.g. Administrative and Professional Office; Construction Service). For help defining a land use class refer to LUC 6.3.

2. Parking required shall be based on the principal use of the site and may not be based on separate floor area uses such as warehouse space for an office. The office use is the principal use and shall have parking based on the entire GFA. For additional clarification on this issue please contact me at the number provided.

3. The last approved site plan provided for reference includes three (3) loading zone spaces along the north perimeter. The TI site plan shows one (1) loading zone provided.

4. Vehicle parking row provided next to the loading zone is not shown on the last approved site plan. Provide parking angle, dimensions of the parking space and PAAL to assure compliance.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/24/2005 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/24/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed