Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T03CM01876
Parcel: 116162350

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T03CM01876
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/09/2003 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/09/2003 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Resize the RPBP and the water meter to comply to Section 610.2, UPC 1994.
2. Correct installation of P-2 and P-3 to conform to Section 908.1, UPC, 1994.
3. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over a mop sink is not approved location. Reference Section 608.5, UPC, 1994.
4. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC.
5. Provide calculations and sizes of scuppers and downspouts. Reference Appendix D, UPC.
05/09/2003 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the exhaust volume scheduled for EF-3 with the exhaust volumes shown on the floor plan.
05/09/2003 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
05/20/2003 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING REVIEW Denied see comments under T03CM01875
05/28/2003 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied Needs WasteWater, 8th floor review - Glen Hitz 740-6500 (Building "close" to 30" public sewer). Needs manhole construction permit.
06/03/2003 MARTIN HAEBERLE BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. MPR does not reflect the required fixtures per Table 2902.1 IBC. Note: A total fixture count and occupant load of the school may be used if the total is in compliance with Table 2902.1 IBC.
2. Provide occupant loads on the plans for the MPR building. Note, a 7 net ratio is to be used for the assembly area. Reference Table 1003.2.2.2 IBC
3. The urinal is to be accessible per section 1108.2 IBC
4. Weep screed is not shown on plans for the stucco system. Reference section 2512.1.2 IBC. Revise plans
5. Overflow for the roof leader appears to be undersized. Provide calculations for sizing of overflow.
6. Ceiling Plan shows lay-in tile and bathroom cross-section indicates drywall. Please clarify. Note attic ventilation required if drywall.
06/05/2003 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
06/05/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Floodplain Use Permit Application - Davis School
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 5 June 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER(s): T03OT00811/T03CM01876

SUMMARY: Engineering Section has reviewed the floodplain use permit application received on May 8, 2003. Certification of the lowest finished floor for the proposed new structure will be a required condition of permit issuance and compliance. Floodplain approval is not recommended at this time - resubmittal is required. Please address the following comments:

GRADING SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Depict and label existing and future sight visibility triangles, per Development Standard (DS) 2-02.2.1.10. Lines of sight will not be obscured between 30" and 6 ' within a sight visibility triangle;
2. Depict and label the limits of the 100-year floodplain; (DS 2-02.2.1.15);
3. Depict and label drainage patterns, proposed finished floor elevation and finish grades (DS 2-02.2.1.16);
4. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities. (DS 2-02.2.1.17);
5. Dimension and label the existing and future, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, rights-of-way to include intersection widening dimensioning for Granada Avenue at Saint Mary's Road (DS 2-02.2.1.19);
6. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.21);

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:

1. A copy of the Site Plan is not included in the report, as stated on page 1 - please provide this exhibit in each copy of the report;
2. In accordance with Section 26-5.2 -Tucson Code, the report must demonstrate at a minimum, that this proposed development will not: a) result in damage to public facilities as a result of erosion or flooding events, b) generate adverse impact to adjacent, upstream, or downstream properties, c) increase the base flood elevation by more than one tenth of a foot, d) result in higher floodwater velocities. Specifically, floodwaters may not be diverted onto adjacent property or right-of-way;
3. Depict and label the 100-year floodplain limits as shown on the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel under existing and developed conditions. The recent Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) affecting this project serves as the most current FIRM panel Special Flood Hazard Area delineation (commonly referred to as 100-year floodplain). The proposed fill for the structure will result in a change to this current delineation, and will require an application for, and approval of a new LOMR within 180 days of construction.
4. Elevations provided in the report and on plan must be referenced to an established datum or base elevation with conversion data provided for reference to National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) elevations (DS 2-02.2.1.15, 10-02.0, sec.2.3.1.4 C 5 & Tucson Code, Sec. 26-11.2 a & b);
5. The Site Plan to accompany the report should clearly depict the location and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing structures on the site, locations and elevations of streets, water supply lines, and sanitary and waste disposal facilities, where applicable (Tucson Code, Sec. 26-11.2 a);
6. The report must discuss the effects this development will have on the flow of water through the area being developed and the surrounding area, to include effects on flood heights, water velocities, direction of flow, sedimentation and/or erosion, volume of flows and the resultant effects on adjacent structures and property - see last sentence of comment number 2, above (Tucson Code, Sec. 26-11.2 e);
7. Provide the soils investigation study, outlining at a minimum, the determination of areas or lands to be graded or disturbed which may create sediment deposition or erosion within the regulatory floodplain (Tucson Code, Sec. 26-11.2 f );
8. The report should include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to applicable Local, State and Federal Floodplain Regulations (DS 10-02.0, Section 2.3.1.7 B)

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, ext. 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/12/2003 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/06/2003 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF Completed