Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP22-0091
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/26/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 04/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | |
| 04/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 05/05/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/10/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: City Center Development Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0091 – C9-21-11 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2022 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 14, 2023. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the engineer listed on the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0091, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Permitting Note 3 you list “FAMILY DWELLING” and “MULTI-FAMILY”. Most of the calculations talk about multi-family. Clarify what the proposed use is. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As I-10 is designated as a “STATE & INTERSTATE ROUTE” of the COT MS&R map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Granada Ave on the plan: dimensioned width of curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for the right-of-way (ROW) along the north side of the property: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of five (5) parcels: 116-19-027A, 116-19-028A, 116-19-033A, 116-19-175B & 116-19-378B, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with the next submittal. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Rezoning condition 13 mentions Phasing. If Phasing is proposed clearly show the phasing on the plan and provide all applicable calculations on the plan. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The 15’ PAAL shown south of the 12 vehicle parking spaces just east of the access to the north ROW, does not meet the requirements of UDC Table 7.4.6-1 and Figure 7.4.6-A for access to 90-degree parking and should be 24’ wide. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The 12.5’ PAAL shown west side of the 22 vehicle parking spaces along the east side of the project, does not meet the requirements of UDC Table 7.4.6-1 and Figure 7.4.6-A for access to 90-degree parking and should be 24’ wide. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a width dimension for the eastern most access off of north ROW. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The striped access from the accessible vehicle parking spaces shown northwest of BLDG G appear to encroach into the PAAL. Clearly demonstrate that the required 24’ PAAL is maintained. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking calculation shall include the number of required and provided accessible parking space to include the van accessible spaces. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the angled vehicle parking that demonstrate all dimensions shown on Figure 7.4.6-A. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located, Provide a sidewalk at the following areas: a. Along the full distance along the west side of BLDG E. b. Along the east side of Office & Fitness Center. c. Along the north side of the Maintenance Bldg. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene: a. Along the east side of BLDG A. b. Along the south side of BLDG B. c. Along the south side of BLDG D. d. Along the west side of BLDG F. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. That said the striped area shown running east of the accessible space shown southeast of the southeast corner of BLDG A is not allowed in the location shown. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It is not clear how access from all accessible parking spaces is provide to the site. Clearly demonstrate on the plan that requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 502.5 are met and how access form the access aisle to the sidewalk is provided. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – It does not appear that the plan matches the Rezoning PDP dated 7-22-21 Provide written documentation form John Beall that this plan matches. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of Rezoning conditions 13, 16, 18 & 20 are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nocholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | In the Documents section of PRO, see the document titled "Real Property Exchange (Parks & Recreation review), first submittal" Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Tue 5/10/2022 9:04 AM There is a public ingress, egress, recreational use and landscape easement to the City of Tucson for the El Paso & Southwest Greenway that is located on the southwest corner of this property that is not reflected in these drawings. The easement limits should be added to the plans. See "Exhibit B" on the attached real property exchange document. Howard Dutt, RLA, Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/16/2022 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Thu 5/12/2022 1:58 PM ADOT has the following comments on this DP. Upon review of the Site Plan, this development will be obtaining access from both Granada Ave and an existing cul-de-sac which accesses the westbound I-10 frontage road. This access does not currently exist, and traffic does not currently use this access point to get to Hotel Tucson. ADOT is requesting a Traffic Statement regarding potential traffic impacts to the frontage road from this Development. Thank you. Jay Gomes Arizona Department of Transportation |
| 05/24/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show new and existing fire hydrants on the property. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 05/25/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0091 Address: 475 N Granada Ave Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: Travellers’ Accomodations Proposed Use: Multi-family TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 25, 2022 DUE DATE: May 10, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. General Note - Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. The rezoning conditions state that an existing plant inventory is required. It is sufficient to include total quantities and species, but they must be included on the NPP plan. Please indicate that the non-natives will remain in place and will be irrigated and protected during construction. If any are to be removed, they must be replaced on a 1:1 basis and indicated on the plans. Any loss of vegetation that was to remain in place will be required to be replaced with a drought-tolerant species. 4. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, landscape borders, and oasis calculations. Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 5. The parking areas do not have enough trees actually in the parking area. Cutting existing asphalt to include trees in the parking areas will be required. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. Solar canopies can replace the tree requirement. 6. Parking lot calculations appear to be incorrect (L8), provide a summary total with the other required landscape calculations and make sure that calculations are correct on each sheet. 7. Please consider using a more shade dense tree other than Acacia salicina for the parking areas. 8. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 9. How is turf being watered? It doesn’t seem to be included in the Water Harvesting calculations. 10. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 11. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 12. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area. f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 13. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 15. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 16. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 17. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 18. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt or decomposed granite; hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable. 19. UDC 7.7.6 The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 20. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/07/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP22-0091 Comments: 1. Sheet 2- Add "Per P.A.G. standard 207" to Keynote No.9, -New Curb Access Ramp. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/27/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | <See the Plan mentioned below in the DOCUMENTS section of Pro, titled "Pima Co Addressing, first submittal review comments"> Email from: Nicholas Jordan <Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Thu 6/23/2022 2:22 PM Pima County Addressing is returning DP22-0091 DP for City Center Development for correction. Please see the attached plan for comments. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 07/12/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Note that the current retention/detention manual defines undesignated basins as balanced basins. The drainage report should be updated to match the manual. 2. The PAAL along the east parking area doesn't meet the minimum width. Revise the parking to meet the design requirements of UDC 7.4.6.D Make sure all PAALs meet the minimum width based on parking stall configuration. 3. Identify items marked with "P" in the approach to the solid waste enclosure on the west side of the project. Clarify the features will not impede service vehicles. 4. Make sure all features are clearly identified. 5. Clarify the extent of grading throughout the site. Provide grading limits and clearly indicate which features are to be preserved and which will be removed. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/13/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | email from: COTDSDPermits To: Ross Lamberson cc: Nick Roe Wed 7/13/2022 8:36 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP22-0091 Site/Grading - City Center Development. Redevelop existing hotel into multi-family units. 475 N GRANADA AV FEE BALANCE: $ 1,404.70 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If the online amount doesn't match "Fee Balance" shown above, check back in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your SECOND submittal documents accordingly, example: 2_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |