Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0157
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0157, 2nd submittal Address: 165 S Linda Ave Parcel: 116-20-637A Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: previously disturbed vacant land Proposed Use: Multi-family residential and commercial uses TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 3, 2022 DUE DATE: January 5, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 1. Demonstrate how the project complies with the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidelines. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Mon 1/10/2022 2:16 PM 1. Sheet 11, Detail No. 4- Modified Curb Access Ramp. Please provide point grades for the curb ramp; at top of ramp, at bottom of ramp and top of wings. Also provide a landing at the top of the ramp. Or add a note that states, "Per P.A.G. standard detail 207." 2. Please add dimensions for the Sight Visibility Triangles. 185-feet Near Side and 110-feet Far Side. David Stiffey City of Tucson Transportation & Mobility |
| 01/10/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. The north access shall have a turn around provided. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 01/17/2022 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Needs Review | Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 1/14/2022 4:42 PM This project has a balance of $317. I will schedule the review after the review fees are paid. Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-9623 |
| 01/17/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: Ann Moynihan <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 1/14/2022 2:59 PM The District requires further information about the interface of this project with the proposed park improvements prior to final approval of this Development Package. The District will schedule a meeting with WLB to discuss to obtain the revised design for the staircase, connectivity to the Mercado, demonstration of sufficient overbank area, demonstration of no conflicts with the reclaimed water line and design for the storm drain outfall within the park. Thank you, Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 01/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson Tue 1/18/2022 12:05 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0157 DESCRIPTION: 165 S LINDA AV, Site/Grading/Swppp - Bautista Mixed-Use Project. FEE BALANCE: $ 82.50 (one extra hour review time by Fire Dept.) ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 01/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Email from: Andy.Vera@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 1/18/2022 10:18 AM 1. Identify each trash (with recycle?) room location, size of the containers, and detail of the area where containers will be placed out for collection service; within this DP. Include all detail with dimensions. Clarify method of how trash gets disposed into trash room and whether compacted or loose material. TSM 8-01.4.0, 8-01.5.3, 8-01.5.4, 8-01.8.0 2. Include enclosure detail with dimensions. Must include provisions for both trash and recycle waste. TSM 8-01.5.2 3. Depict 14’ x 40’ clear approach in front of enclosure/collection area, with turning radii, for maneuvering to collection area/s. TSM 8-01.5.3 Feel free to contact me with any comments or questions regarding this review. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
| 12/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/15/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | IID/IPP Application (Design Package) will need to be approved prior to approving the Development Package. The Development Package will need to reflect an approved Design Package. |
| 12/15/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/31/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Bautista Mixed Use Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0157 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 31, 2021 DUE DATE: January 05, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 20, 2022. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. This comment was not addressed correctly. Retail is a Use Group not a use, clarify what use you are proposing under the Retail Use Group and provide all applicable Use Specific Standards. Restaurant is not a use listed in the UDC and should be listed as Food Service, Excluding Soup Kitchens, subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Zoning and land use note 4 states “THE PROPOSED USES ARE AS FOLLOWS: but only lists one use “RESIDENTIAL (APARTMENTS)” and this use is not a use listed in the UDC and should be listed as Multifamily. Plus clarify what other uses are proposed and list them as a use that is classified in the UDC and if applicable list any associated Use Specific Standards. 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As it appears that you will be using the IID provide the IID case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 3. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this site is located within the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) RNA review is required. Provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.7 – As some type of land split, lot line reconfiguration is proposed provide the case number adjacent to the title block. This process will need to be completed prior to approval of this DP. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – All existing easements shown to be abandoned will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – There is a “55’ INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT’ shown to be partially under the north side of the propose building. This easement will need to modified or abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – A lot line reconfiguration will need to be processed prior to approval of this DP. 8. This comment was not addressed correctly. Apartments is not a use listed in the UDC and should be Multi-Family. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation should only reference uses as listed in the UDC. 9. Unit the IPP is approved Zoning cannot approve the DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G Fractional Amounts, When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said for the retail use, 13320/300 = 44.4 or 44 required. Also, the total number of spaces required is not correct and should be 390 with 260 proposed on site. 10. This comment was not addressed. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.3 tandem parking is not allowed for this use. 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 12. This comment was not addressed. No short-term detail provided on sheet 11. Also, the required long-term bicycle parking for the Food service and Retail cannot be provided within the residential dwelling units. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both short- & long-term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. For your information the long-term bicycle parking can be located within each multifamily dwelling unit and not detail would be required. 13. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – All proposed easements will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. 14. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the definition of developing Area this site is considered as developing area for street perimeter yard setbacks. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Figure 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the street perimeter yard along Linda Ave would be 21’ or the height of the building exterior wall, greater of the two, measured from the back of curb. As street perimeter yard setback dimensions were not provided Zoning cannot provide a complete comment but the proposed building does not meet street perimeter yard setbacks. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |