Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0157
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 06/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 06/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 06/30/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | 6/30/21 - Review by María Gayosso No IID application packet has been filed. |
| 06/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CTRL DIST | Reqs Change | Email from: <Ann.Moynihan@pima.gov> To: CDRC Tue 7/20/2021 12:50 PM The Regional Flood Control District has reviewed the 1st Submittal of the site plan for Bautista Mixed-Use Project, DP-0157, and has the following comments: 1) Use the more conservative of effective FEMA FIRM or the JE Fuller Sediment Removal modeling to set the bank elevation. 2) The District recommends underground parking entrances be placed on the west side of the project or that the entrance elevation is at least 3 feet above the Base Flood Elevation from comment 1. The proposed pump system is acceptable. Gravity drain should be prohibited. 3) The connection from the plaza to The Loop encroaches more than a previous version reviewed by the District. Provide a 50-foot setback from the path similar to the Caterpillar development. 4) The District agreed that the Caterpillar overbank width would set the precedent for this area. 5) Areas adjacent to The Loop shall be vegetated as approved by the District. Connectivity from the path to Mercado San Augustin should be provided. 6) Continue coordination about property acquisitions with the District. 7) Provide a riprap slope with cutoff wall adjacent to the ramp. 8) A Facility Impact Permit is required prior to construction for any improvements impacting the Loop or bank protection. Ann B. Moynihan, P.E., CFM Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson AZ 85701 520-724-4638 |
| 07/21/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: <David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 4:04 PM To: CDRC <CDRC@tucsonaz.gov> 1. If Construction Key Note 5 (Locking pavers) are a pedestrian path as it seems, please provide ADA compliant ramps where the walkway meets the curb returns of the ingress/ egress from the property to Paseo De Los Zanjeros. 2. If the locking pavers are a pedestrian pathway as it seems, please provide pathway "dimensions" and spot grades. 3. Provide on the plans "Sight Visibility Triangles" where the entry/ exit of proper meets Paseo De Los Zanjeros and also where Paseo De Los Zanjeros meets Linda Ave. (It appears that quite possibly one or more of the trees to be planted at the entryway off of Paseo De Los Zanjeros may be in the way of the sight visibility triangles.) David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 07/22/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/26/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Bautista Mixed Use Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0157 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 26, 2021 DUE DATE: July 23, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 20, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address and phone number to the owner and email address for the architect on the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0157, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label all streets that abut the site on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Zoning and land use note 4 states “THE PROPOSED USES ARE AS FOLLOWS: but only lists one use “RESIDENTIAL (APARTMENTS)” and this use is not a use listed in the UDC and should be listed as Multifamily. Plus clarify what other uses are proposed and list them as a use that is classified in the UDC and if applicable list any associated Use Specific Standards. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As it appears that you will be using the IID provide the IID case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this site is located within the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) RNA review is required. Provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.7 – As some type of land split, lot line reconfiguration is proposed provide the case number adjacent to the title block. This process will need to be completed prior to approval of this DP. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – As this site would be considered a Non-Residential use, see UDC Article6.3.3.D, and per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2, ZONES, C-2 & C-3 Zone, do not have a lot coverage requirement remove Zoning an land use note 6 as it is not applicable. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – All existing easements shown to be abandoned will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – There is a “55’ INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT’ shown to be partially under the north side of the propose building. This easement will need to modified or abandoned prior to approval of this DP. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Linda Ave, right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – A lot line reconfiguration will need to be processed prior to approval of this DP. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with adjacent zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D and Figure 7.4.6-A the minimum width of a PAAL that accesses 90-degree parking is 24’. There is a 16’ wide PAAL shown near the northwest corner of the parking structure that does not meet width requirements. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Just west of the “BASEMENT RAMP” that comes off of W Paseo De Los Zanjeros there are 7 vehicle parking spaces that do not appear to a PAAL that provides access to them. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation should only reference uses as listed in the UDC. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G Fractional Amounts, When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said for the retail use, 13320/300 = 44.4 or 44 required. Also, the total number of spaces required is not correct and should be 390 with 260 proposed on site. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The mounting height for the accessible parking space sign is not correct and should be 60” to the bottom of the lowest sign if not located within a pedestrian way and 84” is located within the pedestrian way. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.3 tandem parking is not allowed for this use. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Compact vehicle parking spaces are not allowed. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking space calculation should only reference uses as listed in the UDC. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify how many multifamily units are proposed. The short- & long-term bicycle parking is using 389 for the calculation when the vehicle parking is using 265 and the title on the cover sheet shows 265. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The required number of short-term bicycle parking for the food service use is not correct and should be 4, see UDC Article 7.4.3.G. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The required number of long-term bicycle parking for the food service use is not correct and should be 2, see UDC Article Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, Food Service, 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide the number of short-term bicycle parking spaces provided. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both short- & long-term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. For your information the long-term bicycle parking can be located within each multifamily dwelling unit and not detail would be required. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – All proposed easements will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the definition of developing Area this site is considered as developing area for street perimeter yard setbacks. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Figure 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the street perimeter yard along Linda Ave would be 21’ or the height of the building exterior wall, greater of the two, measured from the back of curb. As street perimeter yard setback dimensions were not provided Zoning cannot provide a complete comment but the proposed building does not meet street perimeter yard setbacks. 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide ramp details for all ramps proposed on site so that accessible requirements can be verified. These details shall meet the requirements of the ICC A117.1-2009. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/27/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet 1 1. Place stamp in legible area. Typical on all sheets. 2. Provide the name and date of the geotechnical report. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the firm who prepared the report. 3. Provide earthwork quantities Sheet 2 4. Add a north arrow Sheet 3 5. Please revise the construction key note for the handicap parking pavement marking sign and for the concrete wheel stop to match with what is on the list to the right. Sheet 6 6. Please complete earthwork Sheet 7 7. Please provide the cross slope all throughout driveway at W. Paseo De Los Zanjeros. Provide a cross section of the driveway on the details sheet. 8. Provide elevation at the proposed catch basin OS1 to verify it is a low point. 9. Revise the 0.00G elevation at the curb that is east of S. Linda Avenue. 10. Please make sure all key construction notes being called out are pointing to the correct item. 11. Please revise the grading at the parking lot east of S. Linda Ave. There is a low point at the end of the parking stall. 12. Please add slope and provide a cross section of S. Linda Ave that includes the parking stalls and add to the details sheet. 13. Please provide more spot elevations at the curb east of the parking stalls on S. Linda Avenue to verify there isn't any low points. 14. Provide cross slope on the proposed the sidewalk and add spot elevations at the back of sidewalk. 15. Provide cross slope of proposed sidewalk and elevations at back of sidewalk. 16. Please label whether or not the northeast riprap is proposed or existing. If it is proposed, please add a spot elevation. Sheet 8 17. Provide the slope on the sidewalk east of S. Linda Avenue. 18. Please clarify how the water draining back to the building is being treated. 19. Provide slope and elevations for all proposed curb access ramps. Sheet 9 20. Provide all invert elevations for all laterals. Include the slope and length of pipe. 21. Please include the INV(W) elevation. 22. Please provide the stationing to verify the storm drain that is being shown on the profiles. Sheet 10 23. Add stationing on plan view. Sheet 15 24. Please show all BMP's on plan Drainage Report Comments: Sheet 2 1. Add 5-year threshold retention volume calcs and demonstrate retention volume is being met on various water harvesting areas Sheet 9 2. Need more information on sump pump design, max ponding limits, hydrograph routing, discharge pipe sizing, operation and maintenance responsibility etc Sheet 19 3. Add property boundary per legend and make a prominent line weight 4. Remove watershed boundary at Mercado San Augustine if it does not flow onto the project 5. Show CP-1.1E on Figure 3 Sheet 21 6. Show OS-2 on map and include in summary table. Discuss how OS-2 is managed for proposed conditions as flow is conveyed north rather than east 7. Slopes upstream of CP-2.3 need to be protected from erosion Sheet 31 8. Relabel hydro sheet for CP-1.2 (It is labeled CP-1.1) Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Email from: Andy.Vera@TuicsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 7/27/2021 8:16 AM ES Comments to Bautista Mixed Use Project, 1st submittal review, DP21-0157 Denied. 1. DP appears to indicate provisions for trash and recycle waste disposal as an existing enclosure which currently supports Urban Tucson LP. Must include separate provisions to support this project. 2. Include waste calculations to represent service level (size & frequency) and type of service (Front-load, roll-off, compactor, etc.);provide detail/specifications of enclosure; and depict enclosure, 14’ x 40- clear approach, and maneuverability. Refer to TSM 8-01.4, 8-01.5, 8-01.8.0. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor, (520) 837-3798 |
| 07/29/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Needs Review | Applicant: Please contact Pima Co Addressing and arrange a payment to them so they can start their review. See email text below. Thank you. ---------------------------------------- Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Thu 7/29/2021 10:00 AM This project has a balance due of $317. Review will be scheduled after payment is made. Thank you Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 07/29/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Thu 7/29/2021 10:09 AM No comments from ADOT. |
| 07/29/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0157 Address: 165 S Linda Ave Parcel: 116-20-637A Zoning: PAD -10 Existing Use: previously disturbed vacant land Proposed Use: Multi-family residential and commercial uses TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2021 DUE DATE: July 23, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Revise General Note 1 to say that the plan is in conformance with the requirements of PAD-10. 3. Remove reference to screen walls if there not any for the project. 4. Please revise General Note 10 &12, and Inert Groundcover legend to indicate that inert ground cover will be indigenous or similar in color and appearance. Delete reference to vegetative cover in Note 12. 5. Demonstrate how the project complies with the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidelines as indicated in the PAD-10 document. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/02/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Fire Hydrants shall not exceed 600' of any portion of the building as the hose lays not as the crow flys. Please include the hose lay as an extra dp sheet with the distance to all portions of the facility. Label north and south access points as fire department aerial access. Questions: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 08/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard.Dutt@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Wed 8/4/2021 7:41 AM The Santa Cruz River Park east of this site is administered by Pima County under an IGA. Regarding any development within, or connecting to the Santa Cruz River Park, the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department supports any comments or requirements noted by the Pima County Reigional Flood Control District or the Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation Department. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 08/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA COUNTY - PARKS & REC | Passed | Passed per Loren Makus. |
| 08/18/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson Wed 8/18/2021 5:03 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0157 Reviews have been completed. See details below. DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Bautista mixed-use project. 165 S LINDA AV FEES DUE: $ 5,008.76 (see image below, disregard the blue highlight). Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 07.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs:COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |
| 08/18/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | Email from: Philip Paige To: CDRC Wed 8/18/2021 1:57 PM Page 3 of the Dev. package mentions a 30' water easement to be released via separate instrument. Please contact Richard Herran of Tucson Water at richard.herran@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-2130 to initiate the process. No other comments. Should this development need to encroach into City right of way or onto titled City property, please contact me at the number below or contact the Real Estate Division at 520-837-6717. Thank you, Phil Paige, Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Transportation and Mobility Dept. City of Tucson 520-342-4024 cell philip.paige@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. The following can be viewed in the "Documents" section of PRO: 1. TEP approval letter, 09.09.21 2. TEP Facilities Map, 09.09.21 |