Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0097
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/16/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Project Oasis Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2021 DUE DATE: September 28, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 23, 2021. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development 1. This comment was not addressed. The required barriers cannot be eliminated without processing a Board of Adjustment for variance. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The fire lane called out under keynote 9 sheets 9 & 10 requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 2. The required barriers cannot be eliminated without processing a Board of Adjustment for variance. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed concrete pvmt vehicle use area called out under keynote 7 sheet 7 requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. The areas in question are along the north, east and south sides. 3. The required barriers cannot be eliminated without processing a Board of Adjustment for variance. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed concrete pvmt vehicle use area called out under keynote 3 sheet 9 requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. The areas in question are along the north, west and south sides. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/30/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Mon 10/4/2021 1:04 PM 1. Sheet 6, there still is not a hexagon No. 26 to reference Keynote 26. Please add the hexagon reference 26 to sheet 6, or remove it from the list of keynotes. 2. Previous comment No. 5 remains. "On sheet 6. Please provide a P.A.G. standard 200 sidewalk. Tie-in to curb access ramp and to run parallel to the curbed roadway where the property is to be developed. Please provide spot grades with the sidewalk." Per City of Tucson Technical Manual, sidewalk is required in the ROW-along the entire frontage of the development-where it is adjacent to a curbed roadway. East Valencia North Loop, is a curbed roadway. (Standard. Technical Manual, 10-01.3.3D2 "Street Pedestrian Circulation Paths" "Sidewalks will extend the full length of the street frontage of the development to provide continuity of the pedestrian and disabled pedestrian circulation path.") David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 10/07/2021 | EHAMBLI1 | OTHER AGENCIES | REVIEW | Completed | Comments received and acknowledged by City of Tucson on prior review. |
| 10/07/2021 | EHAMBLI1 | OTHER AGENCIES | REVIEW | Completed | NOTE: This review folder is being used for the review comments from Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. |
| 10/25/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/17/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the drainage basin retention design to provide the required safety factor of two for the infiltration time. 2. Provide a clear discussion and justification for using only the fastest infiltration rate for the basin design. The geotechnical engineer recommends using the slower value for basin design. See page 55 of the drainage report. 3. The discharge along the northerly boundary of the project site is greater than 100 cfs and is subject to the floodplain ordinance and riparian protection standards. Add a note indicating a floodplain use permit is required for disturbance in the floodplain area. 4. Demonstrate compliance with the riparian protection standard: TS 4-02. 5. Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.6.6.C.2: "Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area." Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Natalee Perry Fri 11/19/2021 10:19 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0097 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp/Floodplain - BD Project Oasis. Becton Dickinson sterilization facility. 7381 E VALENCIA RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the $13,205.73 payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |