Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0097
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/20/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) WO#6351350 May 03, 2021 SUBJECT: BD Project Oasis, DP21-0097 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 26th 2021. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-307-3864 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Jennifer Crawford, at (520) 548-0868 Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 05/20/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | No parking signs shall be placed along the fire department access lane. The access lane will also be the designated fire department aerial access. Please add not to the drawings regarding the signs. Confirm that the hydrant spacing meets the requirements of IFC 2018, Appendix C, Table C102.1 Note on the drawings that the gate requires a permit from TFD |
| 05/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/20/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Project Oasis Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 20, 2021 DUE DATE: May 18, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 23, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0097, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – On the location map the section corners listed for the section west of section 18 are incorrect and should be “13”. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note 3 needs to be revised to read “PROPOSE USE IS PROCESSING AND CLEANING SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.5.C.2, .5, .6, .7, & .8 and 4.9.13.Q, WITH HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE AS AN ACCESSORY USE SUBJECT TO USE SPECFIC STANDADARS 4.9.10.B.1 & 2.d”, see Zoning Administration letter dated October 14, 2020. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As both Kolb Rd and Valencia Rd which are Arterial Gateway routes designated on the COT MS&R maps provide a general note stating ““THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ).” 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Clearly show all existing easements on the plan along with the recordation information. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet 16 parking area – you show a 24’ PAAL with 18’ deep vehicle parking on both sides. At the northwest end you show two (2) 20’ deep accessible vehicle parking spaces. This will leave a 22’ PAAL width. Per UDC Table 7.4.6-1 & Figure 7.4.6-A the minimum width of a PAAL that provides access to 90-degree vehicle parking is 24’. As this reduces the PAAL with by more than 5% a Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) cannot be used to reduce the PAAL width. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The fire lane called out under keynote 9 sheets 9 & 10 requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed concrete pvmt vehicle use area called out under keynote 7 sheet 7 requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. The areas in question are along the north, east and south sides. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed concrete pvmt vehicle use area called out under keynote 3 sheet 9 requires some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing unimproved areas of the site, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. The areas in question are along the north, west and south sides. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Vehicle parking as based on the particular characteristics of the use. Based on a proposed use of PROCESSING AND CLEANING which is a use under the Industrial Use Group. That said the parking is based on the proposed use and as PROCESSING AND CLEANING is not listed under the use group the requirements are based on the standard formula listed as 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Provide a loading zoning calculation on the plan that provides the number required and provided. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The long-term bicycle parking space calculation is not correct and is based on the primary use, PROCESSING AND CLEANING. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, Industrial Use Group 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – All proposed easements will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP, provide the recordation information on the plan. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the proposed square footage for the Nitrogen Storage called out under keynote 29 and for the EO Drum Storage called out under keynote 31 within the footprint shown on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 05/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 05/24/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Mon 5/24/2021 2:49 PM RE: DP21-0097 1. On Sheet 5. Key note #4 references "curb access ramp" but there isn’t any detail. Please detail a P.A.G. standard 207 curb access ramp tie-in to existing multi-use path, with spot grades. 2. On sheet 5. There isn’t a reference for a "Stop Sign." Please provide a stop sign for vehicles exiting the property onto Valencia Rd. 3. On sheet 6. Key note #26 references a "Stop Sign." There isn’t a note 26 is on the plan. Please add this key note and its location to the plan. 4. On sheet 6. Please provide a P.A.G. standard 207 curb access ramp to the north of the curb return of existing entry way. Tie-in to the existing curb return. Show curb access ramp in detail with spot grades. 5. On sheet 6. Please provide a P.A.G. standard 200 sidewalk. Tie-in to curb access ramp and to run parallel to the curbed roadway where the property is to be developed. Please provide spot grades with the sidewalk. 6. Question: What is the intended use of the large paved "eyebrow" area just in from the Valencia entrance/ exit? David Stiffey City of Tucson Transportation & Mobility |
| 05/24/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | Email from: John Beall <John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 9:21 AM To: COTDSD Please close out the Entitlement review folder as Pass. Thank you. |
| 05/26/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The site is within the Environmental Resource Zone. Discuss the ERZ requirements in the drainage report. Show extent of inundation for all regulatory discharges. Demonstrate compliance with ERZ standards within areas of inundation. 2. Revise the drainage design to meet the detention requirements for all design storms. 3. On sheet 6 two keynotes are used on an area of concrete paving. The two notes give different specifications. Clarify the specifications for all areas of concrete paving. Include rebar specifications when applicable. 4. Clarify the extent of the building. There are building mounted lighting shown in association with concrete pads. 5. Clarify the use of the crane pad. It seems to interrupt the pedestrian circulation system. 6. The plan shows curb returns of 50-foot radii along Valencia Road. Show 25-foot radii or complete a TSMR for the modification. 7. The maximum driveway width at the property line is 35 feet. Revise the plan or provide evidence of permission from the director of DTM. 8. On all sheets, where the building height is indicated with x's or other place holders, provide the proposed height. 9. Clearly delineate the existing floodplain boundaries on all affected site plan sheets. For all areas of the floodplain with proposed disturbance, provide an Environmental Resource Report and demonstrate there will be no unnecessary disturbance of riparian resources. 10. Show compliance with the Specific Plan/PAD requirements for preserving on-site trees using the PAD definition of viable trees. 11. The PAD references bufferyards from the Pima County Zoning Code. Show compliance with the PAD requirements. |
| 05/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: CARTER, BONNIE K CIV USAF ACC 355 CES/CENPL Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 5:58 PM To: CDRC Subject: Becton Dickinson sterilization facility, DP21-0097 DMAFB staff were previously made aware of this project in the summer of 2020. At the request of the requestors representative at Sun Corridor Inc, DM Engineering, Planning and Community Partnership staff met with Becton-Dickinson to better understand the project. After review of their presentation and documentation we provided the requestor and civil leaders at both the City of Tucson and Pima County the following feedback on this project on 17 December 2020: The proposed site for the Project Oasis facility is between the DMAFB approach departure corridor (ADC) and the south boundary of the base. We expressed our concern with the large amounts of ethylene-oxide that would be stored and used in the facility. Due to the hazards associated with ethylene-oxide we recommended Project Oasis be located in another industrial site in the Tucson/Pima County Community. City of Tucson recipients of this email were Mr. Albert Alias, Mr. Andrew Greenhill, Ms. Barbara Coffee, and Mr. Mick Czechowski. B. Kacey Carter, Civ USAF, Base Community Planner 355th Civil Engineer Squadron/CENPL Davis-Monthan AFB AZ 520-228-3291 bonnie.carter@us.af.mil |
| 06/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email sent from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 6/3/2021 9:58 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 06/04/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: DP21-0097 Address: 6601 S Palo Verde Rd Parcel: 140-41-1260 Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: General Manufacturing TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 4, 2021 DUE DATE: May 18, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section 5. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Please ensure that all related case numbers and this DP number are on all plans. 3. The Landscape and Native Plant Preservation requirements are subject to the requirements of PAD-26, which includes the original South Kolb Specific Plan as well as the South Kolb Specific Plan Amendment. Specific 15’ wide bufferyard requirements are described in these documents for the DMAFB boundary and Valencia Road (Scenic Corridor). Demonstrate compliance with these requirements. 4. 1.0 Interior Landscape Border is not correct, there is a border requirement along DMAFB boundary. 5. The PAD-26 document requires that 100% of the viable trees on the site remain in place or are salvaged and re-planted. 6. On sheet 41, please correct the following 4 call outs; Landscape border requirements in this area are met by leaving native plants in place (NUOS). Add a minimum dimension of 15’. 7. Indicate clearly on NPP plans where the Native Undisturbed Open Spaces are, the hatching of graded areas on sheet 42 is not sufficient. Label NUOS area on all landscape plans. Provide calculations on sheet 43 that show that 30% of the site is to be left undisturbed. 8. On sheet 43 and 44, please spell barrel cactus correctly. 9. Show nursery holding area on plans, as well as the temporary irrigation system. Detail the temporary system proposed to establish native seeded areas. 10. Provide a description/detail of ground preparation for areas to be hydroseeded. 11. Note 12, replace Town of Marana Code with City of Tucson UDC. 12. Label the dimensions for the existing and future right of way (200’) for Valencia Rd and Loop Ramp Rd. 13. The symbol for Prosopis glandulosa covers the shrub symbols below. That, and the d.g. hatch makes it difficult to ascertain 50% plant coverage. Revise symbols so shrubs can clearly be seen or provide calculations to show that the plant coverage requirement is met. 14. Relocate all trees in parking lots so that there is a maximum amount of shade covering the asphalt, or provide parking area islands. 15. Identify random squares, arrows and black circle (light fixtures?), open circles with line, on all sheets. Please add all hatching patterns to the legend if they appear on the sheet. 16. There are 8 trees required for the parking area on sheet 48, only 6 are provided. 17. Add plant and irrigation maintenance schedule to plans, per UDC Administrative Manual 2-10-4.4. a. Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required; b. Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive; (already on plan) c. Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials; d. Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and, e. Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems. 18. Please label landscape border width on all plans. UDC Administration Manual Section 2-10-4.2.A.2.f. & .g 19. On landscape border requirement matrix, please provide quantity of shrubs and ground cover for all fields. 20. Show point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 21. Please clearly label the curb inlets to landscape areas (WHIA) to allow water into the planted areas. Grading and paving plans should match. 22. According to parking calculations 21 trees are required, but 15 trees are provided in the new parking area, please add 6 trees to the parking area. The trees in the area north of the parking lot will not count towards this requirement. 23. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/07/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Natalee Perry Mon 6/7/2021 9:40 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0097 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp/Floodplain - BD Project Oasis. Becton Dickinson sterilization facility. 5901 S KOLB RD FEES DUE: $ 13,205.73 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. Thank you. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click "Continue" 5- Pay column - check the boxes 6- Click "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |