Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0044
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | 03/03/21 The Transit Services Division and Sun Tran have no comments. Thank you, Christopher Blue Transit Services Coordinator | Transit Services Division Department of Transportation & Mobility C: 520.260.9558 |
| 03/08/2021 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/09/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide a visible property line on all sheets. Revise the legend as needed. 2. Drainage Notes 2 and 3 lack the words "affected" and "required", respectively. Wastewater Management Note 2 is missing the word "proposed/required" Sheet 3 1. Please provide keynote callouts on site plan. 2. Please ensure existing/proposed utility poles and fire hydrants match the legend and are present in the legend 3. Please add curb call outs on northeast dead ends (basin and wall) 4. Please provide the description of keynote 7 on this sheet 5. Please verify all bearings and distances. Northeast distance appears incorrect 6. Please provide all existing buildings and features on site plan and call out to be demolished by separate permit (see demo plan), as applicable 7. Please indicate existing entrance gate as it will affect site access 8. Show northeast R/W line for E Benson Highway and distinguish between existing and future R/W. Sheet 4 1. Please provide contour labels for existing contours 2. Please provide cross-slope labels or section detail. Cross slopes should be at least 1% per TSM 2-01.10.4 3. Grading Note 4 - Access drives have a recommended pavement section of 3" AC/4" ABC per the geotechnical report. Please revise as necessary. 4. Basin 2 - Please indicate separate retention and detention volumes. The outlet is placed 9" above the bottom of the basin which reduces the retention volume by 3". Revise the drainage memo and accommodate volume requirements as necessary. 5. Contours do not connect to existing at southeast end of Basin 1. Please provide additional detail 6. Provide a cross section for basin # 1 7. Provide outlet location and detail for basin #1 8. Provide information how 1' of depth is stored in basin #2 if outlet is at 9.37. 9. Provide wall elevations to demonstrate basin #2 has a height of 09.62 Drainage Statement Comments: 1. Per Section 2.1.1 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, a Drainage Report is required for all development greater than 1 acre in size. Please provide a drainage report following the outline in the manual. 2. Per City of Tucson Floodplain Ordinance Sec 26-10, all commercial development greater than 1 acre in size are required to provide a method of peak and volumetric reduction as outlined in the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. Please include the calculations in the Drainage Report. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/16/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Hydrant shall be 400' from the furthest part of the furthest builsing as a hose lays or they shall install fire sprinklers and or another hydrant. Please make the changes and resubmit. If you have any questions please call or email me: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 03/18/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 03/18/21 Anytime Storage, 1st submittal review, DP21-0044, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/23/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 dentification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-044 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/30/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Anytime Storage – 1701 E Benson Hwy Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0044 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 30, 2021 DUE DATE: March 19, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 18, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The total number of pages listed in the title block is not correct and should be 9. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0044, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under “DEVELOMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS” note 2 you list “BUILDING USE: UNDEVELOPED” clarify the purpose of this note. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Benson Hwy is listed as an Arterial on the COT MS&R map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – As it appears that this project is an expansion of the existing personal storage to the southeast provide a percentage of building, lot area, and vehicular use area expansion. Addition comments may be forth coming. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As it appears that this project is an expansion of the existing personal storage to the southeast and the site is made up of two (2) parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request with the next submittal. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As it appears that this project is an expansion of the existing personal storage to the southeast the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct and should reflect the entire site. Also, if the floor area expansion is 25% or greater demonstrate on the plan that the existing vehicle parking meets the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.4 & 7.4.6. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - As it appears that this project is an expansion of the existing personal storage to the southeast the bicycle parking space calculation is not correct and should reflect the entire site. Also, if the floor area expansion is 25% or greater demonstrate on the plan that the existing bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.8 & 7.4.9. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Clearly show the future right-of-way lines, sidewalk, and curb on the plan along with location dimensions. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - If the proposed project is to be a standalone site and access is proposed across the parcel to the southeast some type of access easement or agreement will need to be recorded. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Once the future curb has be clearly shown on the plan provide a street perimeter yard setback from the back of curb to the proposed building. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note stating “SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMITS”. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov. My email will return an automatic response stating that I have retired but I am currently working as a contract employee and will respond to your questions regarding this review. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 30, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0044 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Anytime Storage. 1701 E BENSON HY FEES DUE: $ 1,025.00 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |