Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP20-0125
Parcel: 11705069E

Address:
320 N 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP20-0125
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/15/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change (The TEP FACILITY MAP mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.)

WR#6626005
July 10, 2020

SUBJECT: Corbett Block
DP20-0125
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted July 12, 2019.

TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project: There is an underground line extending
Southeast from the J2 cabinet (TMSC-2) that is not depicted on the drawing.
Additionally, TEP facilities appear to be in conflict with walls, walking paths and parking spaces. In order for TEP to approve the plan, our facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer.

Please resubmit a revised blueline to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Cruz Vega, at (520) 349-
9850.
Sincerely,
Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant
Design/Build
06/15/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
06/15/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
06/15/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
06/15/2020 MGAYOSS1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change 6/15/2020- Applicant will need to file for an IID/HPZ application. - Maria Gayosso
06/15/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/17/2020 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT South Central District has reviewed the 1st submittal for said project.
No comments, no impact for any State facilities, recommendation for approval.

Richard La Pierre
Permits Supervisor, South Central District
1221 South Second Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85713
520.388.4234 (office)
RLaPierre@azdot.gov
06/29/2020 GDAURIA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Completed
07/06/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development

Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040
07/07/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
07/10/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Provide Case # DP20-0125 on each sheet.

The site is within the following overlay zone.

5.12.11. DOWNTOWN LINKS SUBDISTRICT (DLS)

A complete or partial exception to the landscaping and screening requirements in Section 7.6 may be granted by the PDSD Director, if shade along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths or outdoor patios is provided for pedestrians and customers in accordance Section 5.12.6.A.2. Alternative pedestrian access that creates connectivity between public entrances to the project and abutting sidewalk is allowed if no safety hazard is created. All pedestrian access must conform to the accessibility standards of the City's Building Code.

Landscape section cannot approve Development Package until IID review is complete.



Ensure that Zoning, Design Professional and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.


Additional comments may apply.
07/10/2020 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Site Section Manager

PROJECT: Corbett Block
Development Package (1st Review)
DP20-0125

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 3, 2020

DUE DATE: June 3, 2020

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 14, 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the Development Package case number, DP20-0125, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The Use Specific Standards listed under General Note 3 are not correct. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-5: PERMITTED USES - INDUSTRIAL ZONES I-1 zone Food Service does not have Use Specific
Standards therefore 4.9.4.1, .2, .5 do not apply.

3. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - As you are proposing to use the IID for a parking reduction Commercial Storage is not an allowed use in the Warehouse Triangle Area, Downtown Links Subdistrict, see UDC Table 5.1-DLS-1.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As you are proposing to use the IID once obtained provide the IID case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, and if applicable any conditions of approval.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of two parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved combo request form with your next submittal. Also, it appears that the existing property extends into public streets contact DMT Real Estate Section to correct these issues.

6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - There is a "20'" access land dimension shown for the access lane shown just south of the "BOCCE BALL COURT". This dimension does not dimension the full width of the access lane. Also, if this access lane is less than 24' demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing the vehicle parking to the south.

7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation references a 25% reduction based on the Infill Incentive District. The only subdistrict that allows the 25% reduction is the Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict (GIIS) and this site is not within that district. The reduction will need to be approved by the IID review. Also, until the allowed uses are corrected the required number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - It appears that you are proposing vehicle parking within the right-of-way (ROW) along the east side of the property. Provide documentation the DMT Real Estate Section has approved this use.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until the proposed uses are clarified Zoning cannot verify the required number of short- and long-term bicycle parking spaces.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail "H' sheet 6, top detail provide a dimension from the rack to the wall to the east, See UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g &Figure 7.4.9-C Bicycle Parking Layouts.

11. 2-06.4.9.O - Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required street perimeter yard from the New 2-Story Building would be 40' as measured to the from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. The IID must be approved for the reduced street perimeter yard setbacks shown on the plan.

12. 2-06.4.9.R - There are accessible ramps, crosswalk and a sidewalk shown near the southwest corner of Building #2 that appears to direct a handicapped person to nowhere. Clarify what the purpose of the ramps, crosswalk and a sidewalk are for.

13. 2-06.4.9.R - The accessible vehicle parking spaces shown near the southeast corner of Building #1, the eastern most access aisle appears to not meet the 2% cross slope max.

14. 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a general note on the plan stating all new signage requires a separate permit.

15. Provide an Open Space calculation on the plan, see UDC TABLE 5.12-WTA-3.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/14/2020 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change Dp20-0125
Corbett Block
Zelin Canchola Transportation and Mobility Engineering

Prior to next submittal coordination with Transportation and Mobility project manager for the downtown links project is required. David Burbank, Kyle DeWitte

Comments and mark ups have been sent to Cypress Civil on 7/8/2020
07/14/2020 JOE LINVILLE COT NON-DSD LANDSCAPE Reqs Change DTM Landscape:

1. Make sure all irrigation under constant pressure is located on private property as stated in note #7 of DTM Standard Notes for Planting in ROW.
2. Include a detail of the Triangle Tree Ring on the plans.
3. Verify all TBD colors and finishes for hardscape in the ROW.
4. Is the concrete knock out the same size for all planters? What is the dimension of the knock out as it appears to be larger than the 6" pipe.
5. Specify screened gravel in sump.
6. Show planter relationship to the curb in the detail.
7. Top of detail text is cut off on Paver-Grate detail.
8. Add note that tree staking is at discretion of City's Representative for trees in the ROW to all details showing stakes.
9. Add notes for irrigation in the ROW to plan.
a. City of Tucson, Department of Transportation and Mobility
Requirements for placement of Private Irrigation Facilities Roadway Crossings within the Public Rights-of-Way

1. Private irrigation facilities roadway crossings will only be permitted in residential roadways and NOT permitted in arterial or collector roadways.
2. Lateral lines under constant pressure shall not be permitted in the public rights-of-way.
3. The HOA/Owner will register private irrigation facilities placed in the public rights-of-way with Arizona 811and become an Arizona 811 Blue Stake Inc. member.
4. Minimize the number of roadway crossings.
5. Sleeves must be in a recorded easement (easement width is dependent on what is needed for installation and/or repairs). To the extent possible, the easements should be created at the time of development/platting.
6. Irrigation lines shall be placed in ductile iron sleeves.
7. Sleeve should extend beyond the right-of-way (into private property), unless otherwise approved by DTM.
8. HDPE continuous line (no joints under the pavement)
9. Irrigation lines shall have a minimum of thirty (30) inches of cover.
10. Detectable marking tape shall be installed.

Thanks,
David Marhefka, PLA
da’-vid mär-hef’-ka
Landscape Architect
City of Tucson
Department of Transportation and Mobility
(o) 520-837-6618, (m) 520-403-5074
07/15/2020 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. A new construction general permit has been issued and must be used for SWPPPs. Replace the earlier permit with the current permit. Ensure the SWPPP meets the requirements of the updated general permit.
2. In the drainage report, clarify the soil type. The narrative says the soils are C and the Hydrological Data Sheets indicate D.
3. On page 3 provide consistent descriptions of adjacent streets.
4. The Development Package shows a new building and a net of 4200 cubic yards of net fill. Provide a discussion of potential adverse impacts from this development.
5. Show easements for development into or over adjacent right-of-way areas.
6. Sheet 3 shows concrete headers for landscape islands within the vehicle use areas. Explain how vehicles will be prevented from encroaching into the landscape areas. (UDC 7.4.6.H.1)
7. Provide water surface contours and floodplain boundaries on the plan sheets.
8. Add a note indicating this project is within a floodplain and floodplain use permits are required.
07/16/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Reqs Change The following are ES Comments to Corbett Block, DP20-0125, 1st submittal:

1. Trash Enclosure Detail on page 6 (must include all dimensions):
A. 8.01.5.2.B, Bollards distance/separation from wall. Must include side wall protection, not shown.
B. 8.01.5.2.F, gates must have a minimum 12ft clear opening.
Drawing notes two enclosure gates however appears to show three gates. Please clarify or correct.

2. 8.01.5.3.B, Include 14'x40' clear approach area in front of each enclosure/container on drawing.

3. 8.01.5.3.E, Include turning radii's for ingress(5th Ave)/egress (South/6th Ave) and maneuvering to enclosure area and around curbed island/s, within drawing.

Denied. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Andy Vera
City of Tucson - Environmental Services
Accounts Representative Supervisor
(520) 837-3798
07/17/2020 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Passed See comments on Okay to Submit.
07/29/2020 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
Your Next Steps: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of documents

DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP / IID - Corbett Block, new entertainment and food service.
PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0125

FEES DUE: $ 3,753.33
Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees).
A payment is required before your next submittal.
ONLINE PAYMENTS **Allow 1-2 days for correct amount to show**
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
(Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay from checking account)

1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
4- Click the blue tab: Continue
5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay
6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info
7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on View to the right of each document

YOUR NEXT STEP:
Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd
1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Name the 2nd submittal documents starting with the
submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

FOR FASTER PROCESSING:
When on the Filedrop page, select the box
"Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all
DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions - and all Land Splits.
(For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".)

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
07/29/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change (The RES APPLICATION mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.)

As noted on page 3 item 36 of the Development Package for Corbett Block, there is an encroachment of the existing building columns and roof into the City's right of way. The applicant will need to apply for an easement to cure the encroachment. RES application is attached.

Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements. Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well.

Michael Hollar, Senior Property Agent
Real Estate Division
Department of Transportation
Main 520-791-4181, Direct 520-837-6784

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/29/2020 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed