Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0125
Parcel: 11706077R

Address:
211 N 4TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP19-0125
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/27/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/27/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved The Environmental & General Services Department has reviewed the second Development Plan for the Partners on 4th property located along Stevens Avenue. In comments on the first Development Plan submittal, we asked for clarification on the path the refuse and recycling vehicles would take when servicing the waste staging area. This information was provided in this submittal. The only question about the refuse vehicle servicing area is if there is a minimum of 25 foot clearance above this area to allow for dumping of the containers into the refuse vehicle. We assume that the utility lines will be underground with the proposed new construction or, at a minimum, not located in the refuse / loading dock area.

Based on this review, the Environmental & General Services Department approves the proposed solid waste management plans for the Partners on 4th property.
Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review.
Tom Ryan, P. E.
City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department
09/09/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change September 6, 2019

RE: DP19-0125 Partners on Fourth PAD, 13-Story Mixed Use Building / 2nd Submittal, Received August 27, 2019

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP19-0125, Partners on Fourth PAD, 13-Story Mixed Use Building; 2nd Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 1.94 acre site, located southwest of the intersection of East 8th Street and North Herbert Avenue. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 33 (PAD-33), with the proposed development being a 13 story mixed use building, which would contain both residential and commercial uses.
This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan.
Conditions of approval:
1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner

cc: Jason Morse
09/17/2019 EHAMBLI1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning Review comments.
09/17/2019 ELISA HAMBLIN ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner

PROJECT: Partners on Fourth, 213 N 4th Av
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP19-0125

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 19, 2020.

1. Previous comments 1 and 2 not fully addressed. Minor formatting errors need to be corrected. Sheet 13 in the landscape sheet set uses a 1/8"=1'0" scale vs. the standard engineering scale of 1"=20' on other sheets. Sheet 17 includes DP19-0125 in the title block, but relevant keynote text is covered.

2. Previous comments 6 and 7 not fully addressed. This comment will remain in development package review until info from other applications is provided on the plan set. If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Additional information will need to be added regarding the IID review and Plans Review Subcommittee review. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

3. Previous comment 9 not fully addressed. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide recording information on all existing right-of-ways.

4. Previous comment 10 not fully addressed. It is acknowledged information on existing lots has been provided on sheet 3 (C2.0). However, dimensions and bearing information appear to be missing for all parcels on the southern half of the existing Herbert Av frontage.

5. Previous comment 11 not fully addressed. Minor formatting correction required. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. I-1 and C-3 zoning boundary on adjacent northeast site not accurately reflected. Boundary should continue to run north-south. I-1 boundary does not terminate on 8th St.

6. It is acknowledged previous comments 12, 13, 18, 22, 23, 24, and 30 have been addressed by the minor amendment letter dated July 9, 2019. However, the letter states "Prior to submitting a revised Development Package, please provide a revised PAD document with all changes, as well as individual redlined pages, so staff can review the changes. Submit these documents including a digital copy to the Entitlements Section of the Planning and Development Services Department." It is my understanding the requested revisions have not been submitted. Please reference minor amendment letter for PAD sections requiring revision. This comment will remain in the DP review until it is confirmed the requested documents have been received.

7. Previous comment 13 not fully addressed. Parking corrections are required. Sheet 1 indicates a total of 259 spaces are provided. A total of 260 are found when totaling sheets 5-7. Sheet 5 (level B1) notes 70 standard spaces are provided while 72 are found on the plan. Sheet 7 (level 2) notes a total of 89 standard spaces are provided while 88 are found on the plan. A formatting correction is needed on sheets 6 and 7 as both are labeled in the table as parking level B1.

8. Previous comment 16 not fully addressed. Minor formatting errors need to be corrected. The Bicycle Parking Calculations table on sheet 1 requires correction. The "commercial" use should be changed to "retail" (as is used for mixed use buildings) in both the short-term and long-term category. The short-term bike parking ratio for "retail" is 1/5000 GFA, minimum 2. The residential short-term notes 75 spaces are provided. Sheet 6 notes 76 are provided. Lastly, long-term bike parking must be in a controlled access location. Amend keynote 6 on sheets 5 and 6 to clarify the long-term bike storage is within a controlled access location (key, smartcard, or other secure method).

9. Previous comment 17 not fully addressed. Provide finding email or letter from City's Bike Coordinator. Short-term bicycle parking is required within 50' of the building entrance. Per PAD Part III.3.D(7) The PDSD Director may allow short-term bicycle parking to be more than 50 feet from a public entrance(s) based on a finding from the City of Tucson's Bicycle Coordinator that the proposed location is consistent with best practices pertaining to siting bicycle racks, particularly with regard to visibility, security and convenience for bicyclists or by paying the City parking in-lieu fee in accordance with UDC Section 7.4.5.B.7. Provide appropriate documentation for modification with the development package submittal.

10. Previous comment 19 not fully addressed. Herbert Av is being purchased by the developer from the City. In order to move the development package forward, a letter/email from TDOT's real estate division is needed to verify the negotiations are underway. Please contact John Cahill at 837-6768 or john.cahill@tucsonaz.gov. Additionally, in order make this a condition of C of O, building plans must be submitted (or a permit started) in order to document the condition on the permit. This comment will remain as part of the development package review until building plans are submitted or a permit started.

11. Previous comment 20 not fully addressed. It is acknowledged easements will not be recorded until after development package approval. Please amend all proposed easements on the plan set to remove SEQ#____ and instead include the language "to be recorded via separate instrument". Additionally, in order make this a condition of C of O, building plans must be submitted (or a permit started) in order to document the condition on the permit. This comment will remain as part of the development package review until building plans are submitted or a permit started.

12. Previous comment 21 not fully addressed. It is acknowledged the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure has been provided within the footprint of the building(s). However, the specific use proposed must be shown in the building footprint as well. Additionally, Area D of the PAD indicates a maximum permitted building height of 30'. The plan indicates a building height of 33'8". Clarify how this standard is being met.

13. Previous comment 26 not addressed. Per PAD Part III.3.A. Section B,C,D table, the setback along 4th Ave is to be 0' or prevailing historic setback. The plan indicates an up to 3' setback. Provide approval that this meets the prevailing historic setback standard. This standard requires review by Historic Review section of PDSD. Contact Jodie Brown at 837-6968 or jodie.brown@tucsonaz.gov for further information.

14. Previous comment 28 not fully addressed. It is acknowledged the required minimum open space per PAD Part III.3.C has been included on the plan. However, the bike area on Herbert Av cannot be counted towards open space. Additionally, the square footage of the level 3 pool deck of 8,737 sf cannot be verified. Submitted building plans do not include square footage. Information must be included in development package. Recommend including a detail for reference.

15. The following three comments relate to required approval by Design Review Committee.
a. Previous comment 29 not addressed. DRC approval of vehicle-sharing is required. Per PAD Part III.3.D(5) A vehicle-sharing program (or other transportation efficiency innovation) will be instituted as part of the residential development on site. A minimum number of vehicles to be maintained on site for shared use will be determined during IID DRC review. Three drop-off spaces are indicated on the plan. Provide approval from DRC this is an appropriate number.
b. Previous comment 32 not addressed. DRC approval of parking visibility required. Per PAD Part III.3.G(2)(a) all new parking shall be designed so that vehicles are not visible from the adjoining street level. This is not discernable via the submitted development package but should be reviewed through the DRC and approval provided.
c. Previous comment 34 not addressed. Per PAD Part III.12. specific design standards must be met. Provide documentation/approval letter from the DRC these standards are met. Additionally, III.12.B.2. requires a step-back or pop out to a minimum of 8 ft. in depth per 60 ft. length of façade in Section A of the PAD. If this standard is modified through a minor amendment, the DRC should be involved in determining the appropriate façade treatment to mitigate this change.

16. Previous comment 31 not fully addressed. Per PAD Part III.3.E(2)(h) outdoor seating, dining areas, shade structures, landscaping and public art may be located in a Right-of-Way subject to a license or easement from Right-of-Way owner. Plan illustrates various features in the ROW, including bike parking which was not mentioned in the PAD document. In order to move the development package forward, a letter/email from TDOT's real estate division is needed to verify the easements are under negotiation and use of the ROW is permitted. Please contact John Cahill at 837-6768 or john.cahill@tucsonaz.gov. Additionally, in order make this a condition of C of O, building plans must be submitted (or a permit started) in order to document the condition on the permit. This comment will remain as part of the development package review until building plans are submitted or a permit started.

17. Previous comment 33 not addressed. Documentation (email, decision letter etc.) is required. PAD Part III.9.B. outlines mitigation measures to be taken to offset the loss of the contributing warehouse. Prior to any development package submittal the applicant is required to work with the City of Tucson Historic Preservation Office on these mitigation measures. Provide documentation this mitigation work is underway. Contact Jodie Brown at 837-6968 or jodie.brown@tucsonaz.gov for further information.

18. Per previous comment 34, the PAD Part III.12.B.2. requires a step-back or pop out to a minimum of 8 ft. in depth per 60 ft. length of façade in Section A of the PAD. It is acknowledged this was requested to be amended by the applicant. This was overlooked and not included in the minor amendment approval letter dated July 9, 2019. An addendum/amendment to the letter needs to be processed. Please contact John Beall in the Entitlements Section of PDSD at 837-6966 or john.beall@tucsonaz.gov.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/19/2019 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP19-0125 / 2nd submittal / Partners on 4th is Conditionally Approved subject to correcting the address on the plans to 211 N 4th Av. All other addresses have been retired. For residential units to be addressed upon Development Package approval by the City of Tucson please label floor plans with apartments numbers and resubmit. This needs to be a 3 digit number with the first number indicating the floor followed by a two digit apartment number.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-7570

CC: Jason Morse
09/23/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

Prior to landscape approval ensure that all the following are addressed.

Obtain permission for use of ROW from TDOT.

Subject to the planning document and design review for IID and HPZ overlays.

Indicate approval date any conditions imposed.

Additional comments may apply.
09/25/2019 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change See Zoning Review comments. There are unresolved items regarding the PAD.
10/02/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP19-0125

1) Sheet C3.0. Show on plans a minimum 5' wide sidewalk along Stevens Avenue and 5th TSM section 10-01.4.0. There are several areas shown where the sidewalk width is reduced below 4' and in the north west corner it appears to be reduced below 3'. Please clarify and update sidewalk widths as needed
2) Previous comment 1. Partners on 4th PAD calls for 5000 cubic feet (37,402 gallons) of stormwater detention or retention. Proposal only provides 2000 gallons which is 5.3% of what the PAD called for. Reviewing floor plans and placement of the existing tanks, there is space available for additional storage. To the best extent possible the requirements of the PAD should be met

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
10/07/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change On behalf of the Real Estate Division we would like to thank you for the opportunity to review DP19-0125. The Real Estate Division comments are as follows...
- Applicant to submit an application for an Aerial Easement to the Real Estate Division for an 5' x 17' aerial easement for a balcony located in the City's right of way as noted on page C3.0.
- Applicant to provide additional information for the 6'x 5' aerial sign easement noted on C3.0. Clarify if the sign is for the building or for a tenant. Depending on the answer the applicant will either need to submit an application for an aerial easement (building) or an Temporary Revocable Easement (tenant will need to apply).
- Applicant to provide additional information for the 6' x 101.83' aerial easement to accommodate a sign and canopy as noted on C3.0. Clarify if the sign is for the building or for a tenant. Depending on the answer the applicant will either need to submit an application for an aerial easement (building) or a Temporary Revocable Easement (tenant will need to apply).
- Applicant to provide detailed drawings for the 4' x 119.10' Private Outdoor Dinning area noted on page C3.0. An application for a Temporary Revocable Easement will be required.
- Item 22 on page C3.0, applicant to contact Park Tucson regarding the purchase of 3 parking meters.
- Applicant to clarify if the short term bike racks as noted on page C3.2 item 13 are for private use or for public use.
- Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements. Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well.

Michael J. Hollar, SENIOR PROPERTY AGENT
REAL ESTATE DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CITY OF TUCSON
201 N. Stone Ave, 6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
Direct: 520-837-6784, Main: 520-791-4371
10/16/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
- A resubmittal is required
Permit/Activity Number: DP19-0125
Project Description: Site/Grading/SWPPP/FUP - Partners on Fourth PAD, new mixed-use 13-story building.
Project Manager: Elisa.Hamblin@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4966

The fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you for the payment.
To view the review comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, enter Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data uploads to PRO periodically.)
Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires changes” comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff
4) Name your 3rd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 3_Plan_Set

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
10/16/2019 EHAMBLI1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Show required aerial ladder truck access to all buildings >30' in HT. (26' width setback from building 15-30').
Show that driveway satisfies TFD access (20' width w/ 18' radius at corner.
Hydrant locations need to be discussed.
* Mtg. with Fire suggested.
10/16/2019 EHAMBLI1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change Design professional approval is required. Comments pending.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/16/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed