Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0125
Parcel: 11706077R

Address:
211 N 4TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0125
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/23/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/23/2019 EHAMBLI1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning Review comments.
05/23/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
05/23/2019 ELISA HAMBLIN ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner

PROJECT: Partners on Fourth, 213 N 4th Av
Development Package (1st Review)
DP19-0125

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 23, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 19, 2020.

1. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. The landscape sheets (14-20) do not meet this standard on the relevant sheets.

2. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. The assigned development package case number is DP19-0125 to be included on all sheets. Also include the IID case number once assigned to all sheets. Landscape sheets are also missing the reference case number C9-18-01.

3. 2-06.4.4.B - On the location map on sheet 1, identify regional watercourses within the square mile area, such as High School Wash, Arroyo Chico and Tucson Arroyo.

4. 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. This standard can be met by amending the reference site plan on sheet 1 to clearly indicate the PAD boundary.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Amend permitting note 3 on sheet 1 to include relevant use-specific standards as outlined in the PAD, Part III.2.A.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Additional information will need to be added regarding the IID review, Plans Review Subcommittee review and the Individual Parking Plan.

7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

8. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. New electrical easements do not have adequate information. Several existing easements are indicated to be released or partially released. Provide adequate information prior to plan approval.

9. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide recording information on all existing right-of-ways.

10. 2-06.4.9.E - Existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. Provide information regarding existing lots prior to combination on sheet 1 for reference.

11. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. The zoning boundary indicated on the plan set does not match the City's mapping system, but does seem to align with the PAD document. City to verify alignment in mapping system.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. Sub-standard (compact) parking spaces are not permitted per this PAD or the UDC. Revise the four compact parking spaces provided.

13. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. As noted on sheet 1, parking provided does not meet the number of spaces required. An Individual Parking Plan (IPP) must be approved for the reduction in parking spaces. In the vehicle parking calculations table, clarify the number of spaces on each parking level in order to verify on the plan set. Clarify whether motorcycle parking spaces have been included in the total number of parking spaces provided.

14. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. A detail is needed to verify access aisles adjacent to accessible parking spaces meet standards.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. On Sheet 1, the loading zone is incorrectly noted as off of Herbert Ave rather than Stevens Ave in the Vehicle Parking Calculations table. Also correct loading zone note as 0 are required, but 1 is provided.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Wall hung racks do not meet long-term bike parking standards.

17. Short-term bicycle parking is required within 50' of the building entrance. Per PAD Part III.3.D(7) The PDSD Director may allow short-term bicycle parking to be more than 50 feet from a public entrance(s) based on a finding from the City of Tucson's Bicycle Coordinator that the proposed location is consistent with best practices pertaining to siting bicycle racks, particularly with regard to visibility, security and convenience for bicyclists or by paying the City parking in-lieu fee in accordance with UDC Section 7.4.5.B.7. Provide appropriate documentation for modification with the development package submittal.

18. Sheet 6 indicates a bike locker room is to be located along the 4th Ave street frontage. Per PAD Part III.3.B. Section D Table indicates permitted ground floor uses as Commercial Services and Retail Trade Uses that encourage street level activity. Bike parking is associated with the residential use and does not meet this standard. Commercial and Retail uses are the only uses permitted along the 4th Ave street frontage.

19. 2-06.4.9.I - Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

20. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

21. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). Clarify height restrictions within the footprint of the building on sheet 4. Max height sections are overlapping with dimension lines and should be clearly delineated.

22. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Pedestrian sidewalks along the access easement are shown at 7.33' in width. The PAD indicates on Exhibit 9: PAD Concept Plan a minimum 12' sidewalk in this easement area.

23. Per PAD Part III.E(1) the feasibility of an access way for pedestrians and bicycles from Stevens Ave through the building masses to Herbert Ave, shall be explored to create through-circulation to the center of the PAD.

24. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Pedestrian sidewalks along Herbert Ave are shown at 6' and 4'. The PAD indicates on Exhibit 9: PAD Concept Plan a minimum 15' sidewalk along Herbert. Pedestrian sidewalks along Stevens Ave are shown varying in width down to 2.94'. Per PAD Part III.3.E(1) a minimum 6' sidewalk is required.

25. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

26. Per PAD Part III.3.A. Section B,C,D table, the setback along 4th Ave is to be 0' or prevailing historic setback. The plan indicates an up to 3' setback. Provide approval that this meets the prevailing historic setback standard.

27. Per PAD Part III.3.B. the ground floor is preferred to be commercial or retail uses in Section A, B, and C. Documentation may be required that market feasibility restricts the preferred uses and as such mostly parking is provided at the ground level.

28. Per PAD Part III.3.C there are minimum open space requirements. Calculations on on-site open space have not been provided. Provide on sheet 1 or in landscape sheets.

29. Per PAD Part III.3.D(5) A vehicle-sharing program (or other transportation efficiency innovation) will be instituted as part of the residential development on site. A minimum number of vehicles to be maintained on site for shared use will be determined during IID DRC review. Three drop-off spaces are indicated on the plan. Provide approval from DRC this is an appropriate number.

30. Per PAD Part III.3.D(6) parking access is specifically outlined per Exhibit 10 and further mentioned in Part III.4.B. Vehicular access is not illustrated or listed along Herbert Ave or through the access easement. The submitted plan does not comply with the PAD and illustrates garage entrances on Herbert Ave and along the access easement. Additionally, PAD Part III.4.C. states points of ingress and egress shall be minimized wherever possible.

31. Per PAD Part III.3.E(2)(h) outdoor seating, dining areas, shade structures, landscaping and public art may be located in a Right-of-Way subject to a license or easement from Right-of-Way owner. Plan illustrates various features in the ROW, as such documentation may be required.

32. Per PAD Part III.3.G(2)(a) all new parking shall be designed so that vehicles are not visible from the adjoining street level. This is not discernable via the submitted development package but should be reviewed through the DRC and approval provided.

33. Per PAD Part III.9.B. outlines mitigation measures to be taken to offset the loss of the contributing warehouse. Prior to any development package submittal the applicant is required to work with the City of Tucson Historic Preservation Office on these mitigation measures. Provide documentation this mitigation work is underway.

34. Per PAD Part III.12. specific design standards must be met. Provide documentation/approval letter from the DRC these standards are met. Additionally, III.12.B.2. requires a step-back or pop out to a minimum of 8 ft. in depth per 60 ft. length of façade in Section A of the PAD. This standard is not met per the submitted plans.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
05/23/2019 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
05/23/2019 ELISA HAMBLIN ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields, Section Manager

PROJECT: Partners on Fourth, 213 N 4th Av
Development Package (Supplemental Review)
DP19-0125

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

1. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Per PAD-33 Part III, Section 9 Historic Review is required.
05/23/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PAG - PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Review not required. This agency was notified for their information only.
05/29/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Reqs Change The Environmental & General Services Department (EGSD) has reviewed the Development Package for the Partners on 4th project to be located at 213 N. 4th Avenue in Tucson.
The waste generation calculations were reviewed and found to be correct. It is proposed that three 4 cubic yard rolling metal containers be used to store refuse and that three 4 cubic yard rolling metal containers also be used to store recycling materials. The containers shall be positioned in the trash staging area on the south side of the building for servicing by the refuse vehicles. The trash staging area is proposed to be the service point for the containers.
The applicant shall provide the following additional information for the Development Package:

1. Does the refuse staging area have the required 40 foot by 14 foot access and operational area in front of the staging area?2. Is there a minimum vertical clearance of 25 feet in front of the staging area?
3. How will the refuse vehicle exit the property after servicing the containers? Backing up onto Stevens Avenue would not be allowed.
4. Show the path the refuse vehicle would take approaching the staging area and exiting the property. Use truck turning templates to show the truck turning radius.
5. Will the refuse vehicle completely pull off of Stevens Avenue while servicing the containers?
6. Is there sufficient area to position eight 4 cubic yard containers in a row in the staging area for servicing?
EGSD can provide more detailed review comments on this waste management proposal upon receipt of the additional information.

Let me know if there are any questions concerning this review.

Tom Ryan, P. E.
City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department
Thomas.Ryan@TucsonAz.gov
06/03/2019 GDAURIA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change High-rise requires 2 fire service lines. If backflows used on FS line, must be considered in system calcs.
06/06/2019 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The "attached PDF" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

DP19-0125 / 1st submittal for review / Partners on 4th is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
06/12/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/18/2019 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
06/19/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.
Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
06/20/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP19-0125

1) Partners on Fourth Planned Area Development. Page 35, section 6. A minimum of 5,000 cu.ft. of stormwater retention/detention/water harvesting is required for this site. Please show on plans and add narrative to the supplied drainage report how this requirement will be met
2) Partners on Fourth Planned Area Development (PAD). Page 30, paragraph (e) Use of Water. Show on plans how this section is being taken into account. Similar to City of Tucson (COT) Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.6.6.C. particularly the grading of the vehicular use areas should be in such a manner that runoff is directed into landscaped areas. Curb cuts should be provided at optimal locations to allow runoff to enter landscaped areas. Available landscape area should be depressed up to 6" to maximize water harvesting.
3) Add grading quantities cut/fill in cubic yards to the grading plan sheet
4) PAD page 34 Exhibit 10, shows a minimum 12' wide sidewalk running east-west along Herbert Av and a minimum 15' wide sidewalk running north-south along Herbert Av. Update as needed
5) In addition to comments from Environmental Services, please provide dimensions of the door opening to the trash room. Also clarify if there is sufficient maneuvering/workspace inside the trash room to move the dumpsters in and out. The proposed layout seems very tight

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
06/20/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
The landscape plan shall include the following:
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of PAD 33:

Landscaping and Screening
Use of the Public Right-of-Way for Landscaping.
Landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met:
The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type;
All vegetation complies with the standards of UDC Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and,
The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Note: Trees along the Modern Street Car route along 4th Avenue will require approval by TDOT Landscape Architect, a Right-of-way Use Permit and a Sunlink Track Access Permit.
Obtain permission for use of ROW.
Use of Water
The following standards conserve water and assist in carrying out xeriscaping design principles:
Water Conservation Design Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving designs. A water-conserving design must take into account soil and drainage factors and microclimates, includes grouping of plants with similar water standards and use of efficient irrigation systems, and attempts to preserve on-site vegetation.
Stormwater Runoff
1) Storm water detention/retention basins not integrated with paved vehicular use areas must be designed in accordance with the Storm Water Detention Retention Manual.
2) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area.
Show how water harvesting is achieved by details and spot elevations on landscape plans.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
06/21/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change (The two documents mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

June 21, 2019
Sharon Beasley
Permit Technician
City of Tucson
201 North Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ. 85701
RE: DP19-0125 Partners on Fourth PAD, 13-Story Mixed Use Building / 1st Submittal, Received May 23, 2019
Dear Ms. Beasley,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP19-0125, Partners on Fourth PAD, 13-Story Mixed Use Building; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 1.94 acre site, located southwest of the intersection of East 8th Street and North Herbert Avenue. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 33 (PAD-33), with the proposed development being a 13 story mixed use building, which would contain both residential and commercial uses.
This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, FAA Part 77 airspace,
The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan.
Conditions of approval:
1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following two notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 6 miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport.
The first proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement. The second proposed note is meant to be a second method of notification, but only for residential related uses, that future property owners and tenants are living near an airport. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed notes help to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4).
1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."
The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.
Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard, Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756
2. For only residential uses - "The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."
The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority, using the mailing address provided below.
Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard, Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner
07/03/2019 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change Requires completion of PAD amendment/clarification.

Alexandra Hines, AICP | City of Tucson Planning and Development Services - Lead Planner | 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 | (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov
07/03/2019 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change Project is subject to PAD-33 and IID comments and associated Design Review. The project will be denied until the planning process is complete.
07/03/2019 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change Provide documentation in development package resubmittal.

Should any ground or aerial encroachments into City right-of-way come to be included, applicant is requested to contact the Real Estate Division to apply for easements. Any development in public streets that cannot be addressed by a PIA should be directed to Real Estate as well.

Alexandra Hines, AICP | City of Tucson Planning and Development Services - Lead Planner | 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 | (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov
07/05/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required.
Fee Balance: $2,099.05 (see the Balance column in the image below).
Prior to the completion of the next review, we require payment of the total fees (or the Review fees at a minimum). You may pay in person at the City of Tucson permit counter (Mon-Fri, 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM) or mail a check payable to the City of Tucson (see address below). Please write your Activity Number on the check.
Activity Number: DP19-0125
Project Description: Site/Grading/SWPPP/FUP - Partners on Fourth PAD, new mixed-use 13-story building.

For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
After all corrections are made, please name your 2nd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 2_Plan_Set.
Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (listing how all comments were addressed)
2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other items requested by review staff
After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The Project Manager can be contacted starting on 07/17/19 at: Elisa.Hamblin@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4966.
Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
07/10/2019 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved (The "TEP facilities map" mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)


June 21, 2019
WR#6274362

City of Tucson
Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician
Planning and Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
Dear Ms. Beasley:
SUBJECT: Partners on 4th, DP19-0125
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 23, 2019. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. Engineering fees may apply.
In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. TEP will require a full set, including the Site plan, Electrical Panel Schedule, and Electrical One-line Diagram. This will start the design process of a Preliminary Design, which takes approximately four weeks to produce.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company , Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington, New Business Project Manager, P. O. Box 711 (DB101), Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Susie Petty, at (520) 917-8741.
Sincerely,
Linda Metzer, Office Support Assistant, Design/Build
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
S. Petty, Tucson Electric Power

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/05/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed