Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0174
Parcel: 14026011A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP17-0174
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/20/2017 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/20/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified. No response needed.
07/20/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified. No response needed.
07/20/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified. No response needed.
07/26/2017 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approved July 25, 2017

Dear Ms. Hines,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0174, Atlas Copco Expansion Phase II & III, 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.87 acre site located northwest of the intersection of East Wieding Road and South Sears Boulevard. The proposed land use is industrial, establishing a construction/heavy equipment wholesale use and trade services and repair use.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, FAA Part 77 airspace, and the City of Tucson Airport Hazard District.

The Tucson Airport Authority has no additional comments to submit for this project. The Tucson Airport Authority submitted an earlier comment letter on submittal DP17-0134, dated June 16, 2017, which pertained to this project. The Tucson Airport Authority notes that all conditions of approval, as indicated in the comment letter for DP17-0134, were included in the Development Package submittal for DP17-0174. The Tucson Airport Authority has also received a copy of the recorded Avigation Easement.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,


Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner

cc file
08/01/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change August 11, 2017
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0174
PROJECT NAME: Atlas Copco Expansion Phases II & III
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1201 S Houghton
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

The proposed improvements in the right of way are acceptable. However the following will need to be modified on the plan or acknowledged.

1. The City of Tucson has adopted the Pima Associates of Government (PAG) 2015 Standard Specification for Public Improvements (SSPI) and Standard Details (SD). Please revise plan set to schematically illustrate the recommended offsite improvements on the development plan. Include standard details on plan set. Include any new sidewalk, ramps, roadway, and any curb work.

2. Call out the curb return radius for the proposed driveways. The access points along Campbell Ave shall have 25' radius curb returns, and meet current ADA standards for crossing the driveway.

3. At time of construction in the right of way permit or private improvement agreement from TDOT will be required.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
08/01/2017 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please clearly indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to section 507.5.1 of the 2012 International Fire Code for guidance.
08/09/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (#5444-20C, 2578.25') is higher than the first floor elevation (2577.54'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
08/10/2017 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
08/10/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Atlas Copco Expansion - Phases II & III
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0174

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2017

DUE DATE: August 15, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 17, 2018.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0174, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - As you have proposed a new use, "COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR STORAGE" provide the Use Specific Standards 4.9.10.A and 4.9.13.Q. 4.9.10.A.2 states "Outdoor storage, when permitted, shall not be located in the street perimeter yard." That said outdoor storage would not be allowed within the western approximate 90' of the entire parcel along Campbell Avenue. Zoning recommends that you remove "COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR STORAGE" from the plans. Outdoor storage can be done as an accessary use to the construction /heavy equipment wholesale use.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

3. 2-06.4.8.B - Per the New Spain Industrial Park Plat, Bk 42, Pg 92 there are several easements that run across this project site. It appears that some may have conflicts with the proposed structures. Clearly show the existing easements on the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

4. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning for the parcels north of this project.

5. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Clearly show how access will be provided to the proposed vehicle parking along the east side of the building. If it is the gate shown near the southeast corner of the site the gate must be 20' clear, provide a gate width dimension. If this gate is the access it does not appear that there is a safe distance for vehicles to enter this yard area and not interfere with a parked vehicle in the propose spaces shown just to the north of the gate. Based on current aerial photos this gate is a sliding gate not a swing gate as shown on the plan.

6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 4 northern most entrance access lane for the west vehicle parking area keynote 3 calls out "EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN". Based on current aerial photos there is no curb along the north side of this curve.

7. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2/b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said demonstrate on the plan that the access lane shown around the "EXISTING RELOCATED CHAINLINK FENCE/GATE" called out under keynote 20 along the east side of the existing building, meets the required 2' setback and minimum width of 20'.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Depending on how comment 2 is addressed the vehicle parking calculation may need to be revised. Zoning recommends that the "COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR STORAGE" use be removed from the plans. If you elect to remove the "COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR STORAGE" the outdoor storage area should be included in the wholesale use vehicle parking space calculation.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 6 there is a "GRADING DETAIL 1" that shows the accessible vehicle parking but the detail call-out on sheet 6 is nowhere near the accessible vehicle parking.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 6 "DIMENSION DETAIL 1" provide a wheel stop location dimension for the wheel stop location proposed for the accessible space.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As the location of the wheel stop for the two (2) vehicle parking spaces shown near the southeast corner of the site appears to be in a different location from what is shown on the "TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL" sheet 9 provide a location dimension for this configuration.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Provide a loading area calculation on the plan. This calculation should show the number required and provided. The type and number required will depend on how comment 2 is addressed.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Depending on how comment 2 is addressed the short and long term bicycle parking may need to be revised.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The long term bicycle parking calculation for wholesale use is not correct and should be based on 1 space per 40,000 sq. ft.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Due to the proposed location of the long term bicycle parking demonstrate how the requirement of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g are met for the existing short term rack.

16. 2-06.4.9.Q - As this site is located within the Tucson International Airport Environ Zone Airport Hazard District provide a proposed building height based on the mean sea level (MSL) for the applicable end of runway, see UDC Article 5.6.11.

17. 2-06.4.9.R - The proposed angled crosswalk running directly behind the accessible vehicle parking space presents a safety hazard. The crosswalk should run perpendicular to the PAAL.

18. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route.

19. This project is located within the Airport Avigation Easement and Disclosure Area and will require review by Scott Robidoux Airport Planner. Contact Kelly Lee, Lead Planner COT at Kelly.Lee@tucsonaz.gov for requirements.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
08/10/2017 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved Agency notified. No response needed.
08/10/2017 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

August 9, 2017


WR# 6198548

DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov
lisa@metroted.com
kmhall@cypresscivil.com


Dear Kevin

SUBJECT: Atlas Copco Expansion Ph II & III
6393 S Campbell
DP 17-0174

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. The existing facilities do not appear to have any conflict, if relocation is required the customer is responsible for the costs.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Billiable relocation will require easements.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Rich Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas @ 918-8295.

Sincerely,

Beth Shelton
Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton
Admin Assistant, Design
08/14/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

7.6.2. APPLICABILITY
Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows.
a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.
b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site.
Verify building expansion calculation.
If 50% or over the following applies:
Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
08/15/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The sidewalk along Campbell Avenue is less than 4 feet wide. Provide a 6-foot sidewalk along the project site. TSM 10-01.4.1.A
2. Modify the entrance into the site to provide an ADA compliant pedestrian route across the driveway.
08/16/2017 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/18/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed