Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0096
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/08/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Note 11 on sheet ASO.1 indicates removal of stairwell. Please explain what this will do to egress from basement.Our records indicate a fire sprinkler system in basement. No annual sprinkler inspections have been performed for years. Please clarify the situation. |
06/08/2016 | DRIVERA1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | see zoning comments |
06/08/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Chase Bank - 047 N. Park Avenue Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0096 - Remove drive-through and redo parking lot / new automated teller TRANSMITTAL DATE: Revised June 20, 2016 DUE DATE: July 6, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 6, 2017. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: A title block shall be provided in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 2. COMMENT: Provide on the cover sheet the 3 x 5 block as noted by the standard above. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 3. COMMENT: Provide on the cover sheet, the information as noted by the standard above for all registrants that prepared the development plan, the owner / developer. Include all information as noted in the standard each individual or organization. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 4. COMMENT: List the name of the project in the title block, i.e. "Chase Bank Site Revision". 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 5. COMMENT: A brief legal description of the property shall be listed in the title block 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 6. COMMENT: List the Administrative street address in the title block. Provide the development package case number, DP16-0096, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map is to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inches equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 7. COMMENT: Remove all property lines drawn on the location map and leave the street center lines. Label Campbell Avenue and as reference also label Park Avenue. 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 8. COMMENT: Label all section corners as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 9. COMMENT: It is understood that a land split application is to be or has been processed. If so, the gross lot area should be based on what the remaining parcel will be once the land split is approved. It may be best to include an additional gross lot area size of the parcel due to the land split under General A on the cover sheet, (such as Gross lot area xxx.xx / xx acres, due to land split.) 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 11. COMMENT: Include in general note C the following, Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.L.1 & .3 and 4.9.13.O. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 12. COMMENT: Add a general note on the cover sheet that states the "This project has been designed to comply with the MS&R setback requirements, UDC Section 5.4." 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 13. COMMENT: On sheet three provide the site boundary information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 14. COMMENT: If applicable, indicate the location of any easements existing or proposed. Include the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 15. COMMENT: Add to sheet three the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 16. COMMENT: The distance and bearings should be labeled on sheet three based on the existing conditions and based on the land split configuration. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. 17. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. Reference the PDSD land split application case number next to the title block. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 18. COMMENT: Revise the zoning classification adjacent to the south property line. The plan indicates the zoning is R-3 but per the PDSD GIS map the adjacent zoning is C-1. Revise all site sheets where the zoning is not correct. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 19. COMMENT: Draw and label the sight visibility triangles on First Street and Park Avenue. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 20. COMMENT: With the lot line adjustment being made to the center of the north / south PAAL a cross access agreement will be required. Clarify if as part of the land split application a cross access agreement will also be recorded or is there a current cross access agreement. Reference on the site plan sheet the recordation information for the cross access agreement document. Provide a copy of the document with the next DP submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 21. COMMENT: Add to sheet three the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 23. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 24. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the grading plan concurrently with the DP site plan as it relates to the zoning purview, such as building footprint, parking lot layout, sidewalks etc. Once zoning approves the DP site plan the Grading plan is approved by zoning unless significant changes are made to the grading plan and does not match the DP site plan. For consistency, ensure that all site sheets are revised accordingly. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 25. COMMENT: Add a setback dimension from the south wall to the new ATM structure. Verify with the Structural plans reviewer that no additional requirements apply to the ATM structure due to it's proximity to the building wall on the south property line. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 26. COMMENT: If applicable indicate the location of any existing or proposed freestanding monument signs. If new signs are proposed add a note that signs will be permitted under separate permit. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 27. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer's comments related to Landscape buffers and screening. 28. COMMENT: Verify that the detail key notes are referencing the correct sheet numbers. For example on sheet three, keynote 3 references "Detail 3/AS1.2". There is no sheet in the DP package with the sheet number AS1.2. revise all keynotes to include the correct detail and sheet number. On sheet four, detail four is labeled with the same title as the one for detail 2. revise accordingly. On sheet four, detail two, revise the height requirement on both notes number one to be 84 inches from finished grade to the bottom of the sign. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
06/08/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
07/01/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
07/01/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/05/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Add a note indicating all new landscape areas will be depressed up to 9 inches for water harvesting. 2. Provide curb openings to direct vehicle use area and roof drainage to landscape areas to the maximum extent possible. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2) 3. Clearly show and label a joint use, joint access easement for the proposed driveway entrance straddling the proposed property boundary. |
07/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
08/05/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |