Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP15-0190
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/02/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | The above project has been APPROVED by Pima County Addressing 02/01/16. |
| 02/08/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | Good morning. Wanted to let you know I looked at the Future ROW detail and it appears to reflect everything I discussed with Cypress. Thanks |
| 02/22/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The development plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan fully until all Engineering and Zoning, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. |
| 02/23/2016 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Yard on Grant Road Development Package (3rd Review) DP15-0190 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2016 DUE DATE: February 25, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 28, 2016. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 1. COMMENT: As a TSMR is proposed provide the TSMR Case number in lower right corner of each sheet along with a general note stating the TSMR Case number, date of approval, what was modified and any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 2. COMMENT: A lot combination will be required for all parcels associated with this project. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 3. COMMENT: Per the future right-of-way detail for Tucson Blvd sheet 6 there are four (4) vehicle parking spaces shown within the future SVTs. As parking encroaches into the SVTs these four (4) spaces cannot be counted as required spaces. As additional reductions are required at the time of widening and additional site work will be required a recorded Major Streets and Routes Covenant is needed prior to approval of the development package. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 4. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said show the required sidewalk to Tucson Blvd. Zoning acknowledges that a TSMR is proposed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/23/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/24/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the TSMR case number on each sheet and provide a note describing the modification approved. I will review over the counter when completed. |
| 02/29/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This reveiw has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |