Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0091
Parcel: 137117540

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP15-0091
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/15/2015 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/16/2015 FDILLON1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Denied Requires Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) per UDC Sec. 8.7.3. FD
06/16/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP15-0091
1425 W Irvington Road
FLD Tentative Plat - Lots 1-68 and Common Areas A1 - A3 and B1 - B3

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2015

DUE DATE: July 9, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 10. 2015.

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

01. COMMENT: The City of Tucson sign-off stamp must be placed in the lower right corner of all plan sheets in the development package, including on the landscape and NPPO sheets.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

02. COMMENT: Label the applicable sheets, the contour interval used under the north arrow.

2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet.

03. COMMENT: The plan must be revised so that north is pointing to the left side of the plans sheets.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

04. COMMENT: It is not clear that the Map and Plat information described in the title block is accurate for Block A. Block A appears to be under the M/P 51/050 and M/P 47/015. Review the information and revise the title block appropriately. Revise the information as required and ensure that all sheets are amended.

2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted;

05. COMMENT: List the common areas in the title block of all plan sheets, i.e. Common Area "A1 - A3" Functional open space and Common Area "B1 - B3" Open Space etc. Revise the information as required and ensure that all sheets are amended.


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

06. COMMENT: All sheets must be paginated with the correct sheet number and the total number of sheets. The Landscape plan sheets have not been correctly paginated. Revise as required, 21 of 38 22 of 38 etc.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

07. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the DP case number DP15-0091. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. If applicable list any additional approval process related to this project as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

08. COMMENT: Label the following on the location map, "West Branch Santa Cruz River" and "Santa Cruz River"

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

09. COMMENT: Label the section corners surrounding the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

10. COMMENT: List the Annexation case number C9-83-34 in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Also as a General note, List the following statement: "This development is subject to compliance with the annexation conditions of annexation case number C9-83-34.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

11. COMMENT: If applicable, list the information as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones.

12. COMMENT: If comment 11 is applicable include the lots numbers as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13. COMMENT: Clarify if the three (3) turn-around areas in Common Area A-1 will remain or are they to be removed? If they are to remain will the turn -around areas be re-recorded as part of the new plat and made permanent? Clarify.

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

14. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the DP Tentative Plat. Ensure that any changes made to the TP are reflected on the grading plan sheets.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

15. COMMENT: See the Landscape Reviewer comments related to Landscape buffers and Screening requirements. Address the landscape reviewer's comments as required.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and,

16. COMMENT: Include under the tabulations text block, the developable area calculation.

2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint).

17. COMMENT: Delineate the developable area of each lot. This requirement can be illustrated on each lot of the tentative plat sheets. Define the area based on the building setbacks and vehicular use areas.

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3 A. Reduced Perimeter Yards
Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis;

18. COMMENT: Draw, label and dimension the building setback from the Irvington Road back of curb to lots one 1 and 68. Draw, label and dimension the building setback along the west boundary where lots 1-15 and 18-23 abut the adjacent subdivision.

2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option
Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate;

19. COMMENT: Include under the tabulations text block, the density calculation for the allowed and proposed number of units per acre.

2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

20. COMMENT: Provide in the next submittal the required documents as noted by the standard above.

2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan
When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows:

21. COMMENT: If applicable, an Architectural Mitigation Plan may be required by the PDSD Design Professional. Review the Design Professional's Comments and address as required.

2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and,

22. COMMENT: If standard 2-06.5.3.E is required, list on the cover sheet, the lot numbers that are affected by the Architectural Variation Plan.

2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.

23. COMMENT: Provide in the next submittal the required documents as noted by the standard above.

2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan
When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:

24. COMMENT: If applicable, an Privacy Mitigation Plan may be required by the PDSD Design Professional. Review the Design Professional's Comments and address as required.

2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation;

25. COMMENT: If standard 2-06.5.3.F is required, list on the cover sheet, the lot numbers that are affected by the Architectural Variation Plan.

2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and,

26. COMMENT: Review the Design Professional's Comments and address as required.

2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots;

27. COMMENT: Review the Design Professional's Comments and address as required.

2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions

2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

28. COMMENT: If the CC&R's are available for review, submit copies with the next DP package submittal otherwise the CC&R's must be submitted with the final plat submittal package.

29. General comment:

General Notes 17 and 18 on sheet 2 of the DP discusses connection to the Santa Cruz River Park Trail and onsite and offsite trails, yet the plan does not show any connection to the trail system. If a connection is proposed draw and label the connection.


30. COMMENT: Additional Zoning comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to the zoning comments and changes made to the DP package sheets.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
06/16/2015 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Reqs Change Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)


FROM: Julieann Arechederra
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office


DATE: June 16, 2015


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP15-0091 OAKMORE SIX (TENTATIVE PLAN)





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
____X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:


" THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP AND PLAT.




NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
06/17/2015 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207





MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 724-9512


TO:
CITY PLANNING
FROM:
MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW

SUBJECT:
OAKMORE SIX LOTS 1-68/TENTATIVE PLAT-1ST REVIEW

DATE:
JUNE 17, 2015








The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:
1.Label Project# DP15-0091 on all Sheets2.Label Common Areas on Tentative Plat Heading & Title Block on all Sheets:Oakmore Six Lots 1-68 and Common Areas CA-A1, CA-A2, CA-A3, CA-B1, CA-B2, CA-B3, CA-B4
3.Label Section corners on Location Map on Sheet 14.Correct subdivision on affected Sheets: Woodbridge III Mp 53 Pg 135.Label Street Name: “ Foundland Drive” (public street) on Sheet 1 site map6.Label Common Area north of Lot 1 as CA-B4 on Sheet 1 site map7.Label Common Area between Lot 32 & 33; Lot 36 & 37; Lot 66 & 678.Correct Title Block on all Sheets to read:Oakmore Six Lots 1-68 and Common Areas CA-A1, CA-A2, CA-A3, CA-B1, CA-B2, CA-B3, CA-B4 being a re-subdivision of a portion of Block A of Oakmore at Midvale recorded in Book 47 of M&P at Pg 15 and Book 51 of M&P at Pg 50, a portion of the NE Quarter of Sec 3, T-15S, R-13-E, G&SRM, Pima County, Arizona
06/22/2015 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved See letter in PRO
06/22/2015 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance.

Note that the introduction of the additional access movements, produced by the development, the level of service in the on the roadways will continue to diminish. Thank you


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
06/25/2015 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Approved See additional documents in PRO

June 25, 2015


City of Tucson CDRC
Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager
201 N. Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ 85701

RE: SWG Plan Review for Oakmore Six - Tentative Plat
CDRC No. DP15-0091

Dear Ms. Gehlen:

Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, existing 2" gas mains are located within Irvington Road, Bagpipe Drive, Breakwell Street, Thatcher Street, and Delahunt Street for future extension into the proposed development.

If public utility easements and/or common areas are to be granted, SWG respectfully requests that dedication verbiage be added to the project general notes, including dedication notes that document the following:

" Utility easements allow for the installation and maintenance of both public and private utilities.

" Private common areas allow for the installation and maintenance of private underground utilities

Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements.

SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone.

All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner.

Please include SWG in all future plat and development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com.

Sincerely,



Arthur Lason
Engineering Technician
Southern Arizona Division


Enc: SWG Contact Information (pdf)
06/25/2015 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: June 30, 2015
DUE DATE: July 09, 2015
SUBJECT: Oakmore Six Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: KB Home, Attn: Mathew Cawley
LOCATION: 1425 W Irvington Rd
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0091

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Package, Drainage Report (JE Fuller Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc., 05JUN15), and Geotechnical Report (Wright Engineers, 27MAY15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development package to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant on each sheet, including all landscape sheets.

2) AM Sec.2-06.3.8: Revise the development package to label the contour interval used under the north arrow on all applicable sheets.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development package to verify the recordation information for the existing subdivision within the Title.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.C: Revise the development package to list the common areas with descriptions in the title block of all plan sheets, i.e. Common Area "A1 - A3" Functional open space, Drainage, Grading, Utilities, Landscape and Common Area "B1 - B3" Open Space, Grading, Landscape, etc.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan package and landscape sheets to have the correct pagination, i.e. Sheet 21 of 38, 22 of 38, etc.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant development package case number (DP15-0091) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheet where indicated by "DP15-XXXX." Verify that the case number is also added to all of the Landscape Sheets.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.B: Revise the development package and Project Location Map to identify all regional watercourses within the one square mile area shown.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development package to list the annexation case number C9-83-34 in the lower right corner of all plan sheets.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development package to provide a General Note as per the following statement: "This development is subject to compliance with the annexation conditions of annexation case number C9-83-34.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.F.1: Revise the development package to list the following note as appropriate if a trail or path is proposed, provide a note, as appropriate, indicating that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk, road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development package for all existing easements that are to be abandoned. If an easement has been recorded by separate instrument then it must be abandoned by a separate instrument and cannot be released by a Final Plat. This applies to the temporary drainage easements under Docket 10316, Page 1165.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development package to label the Improvement Plan Number in plan view for all existing storm drainage facilities within Irvington Road right-of-way.

13) M Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development package to label the size, type, elevation inverts, etc. for the existing storm drain under the existing Park & Ride Parking lot driveway. Provide the Improvement Plan Number or Development Package Number in plan view.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.C: Revise the development package to clearly label all common areas onsite with a separate designation and enclosed with a solid line.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the Irvington Road right-of-way as Existing/Future.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.4: Revise the development package to label Irvington Road as "MS&R." Specifically "MS&R Arterial."

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development package to clarify the proposed 25-foot storm drain easement for the new drainage pipes. Provide a statement as to the easement being public or private and either provide the recordation information for the easement as a separate instrument or state "By Final Plat."

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development package and the existing Platted Temporary Turn Around Easement that falls on the subject property. The vehicle turn around easement needs to be revised to be permanent at this time so that the can be sued by the adjacent properties.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development package and General Grading Note #25 to provide a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual Sec.2-01 (excavation and grading requirements).

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development package and all applicable sheets/details to label and dimension the required 15-foot wide basin access ramp as shown into the proposed landscape area per TSM 4-04.14.3.4. Verify access into the basin from the public roadway without driving over the vertical curbing. Label the removable post barricades or fencing to prevent unauthorized access.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development package and all associated sheets, details and keynotes to label the proposed 48-inch storm drains from the site across City property as reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). Per TSM Sec.4-04.10.3.4 & 9 the minimum acceptable material for storm drains within a right-of-way must be concrete. Prior approval from TDOT and Real Property will be required to install the proposed pipe through City property. A maintenance and construction easement will be required.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label and dimension the minimum 6-foot width requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-way of Irvington Road. For the existing 4-foot sidewalk width along Irvington Road verify conformance with handicap accessibility and if the sidewalk is in acceptable condition then per TSM Sec.10-01.4.1.A.1.c where sidewalks are less than five feet in width, passing spaces at least five feet by five feet will be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet.

23) AM Sec.2-06.5.3.F: Provide 3 copies of the CC&Rs regarding the HOA's responsibility for ownership and maintenance of commonly owned property.

SWPPP: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES 2013 Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

24) CGP Sec.6.3(5)c: Revise the SWPPP to provide the percentage of the site that is impervious (e.g. paved, roofed, etc.) before and after construction.

25) CGP Sec.6.3(5)f: Revise the SWPPP to identify and describe all material storage areas (including on-site and offsite overburden and stockpiles of dirt, borrow areas, etc.).

26) CGP Sec.6.3(6)g: Revise the site map to provide the location of on-site material, waste, borrow areas, or equipment storage areas, and other supporting activities.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Package and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.


Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
06/26/2015 PGEHLEN1 POLICE REVIEW Approved have no issues with this request.


CSO Becky Noel #37968
Tucson Police Dept.
1100 S. Alvernon
Tucson, AZ 85711
520-837-7428

>>> DSD_CDRC 6/15/2015 10:13 AM >>>

Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0091
Existing and Proposed Zoning: R-3
07/02/2015 KBROUIL1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
07/06/2015 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Reqs Change Tucson parks and Recreation Department comments:

Revise the development plan to satisfy the requirements stated in Engineering's plan review regarding easements, construction and maintenance of any improvements constructed within the boundaries of the Santa Cruz River Park including:

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.F.1: Revise the development package to list the following note
as appropriate if a trail or path is proposed, provide a note, as appropriate, indicating
that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location
of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is
intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk,
road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path
is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development package to clarify the proposed 25-foot
storm drain easement for the new drainage pipes. Provide a statement as to the easement
being public or private and either provide the recordation information for the easement
as a separate instrument or state "By Final Plat."

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development package and all associated sheets,
details and keynotes to label the proposed 48-inch storm drains from the site across
City property as reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). Per TSM Sec.4-04.10.3.4 & 9 the
minimum acceptable material for storm drains within a right-of-way must be concrete.
Prior approval from TDOT and Real Property will be required to install the proposed
pipe through City property. A maintenance and construction easement will be required.

Additionally, note on the development plan that any existing surface or subsurface park improvements disturbed by this development are to be repaired or replaced to the satisfaction of the Tucson Parks and Recreation Department; all disturbed surfaces are to be left in a similar grade and condition as their existing state; and that all park areas disturbed by construction activities will be disked to a four inch depth and seeded with a native plant mix to be approved by Tucson Parks and Recreation.


Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
07/06/2015 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change July 6, 2015
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0091
PROJECT NAME: Tentative Plat Oakmore six
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1425 W Irvingnton Tucson AZ
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.


1. Dimensioned any new sidewalk along Irvington. New sidewalk will require 6 feet.

2. The street intersections shall have 25' radius curb returns.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
07/07/2015 PATRICIA GEHLEN ADA REVIEW Passed
07/07/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor (e.g. lots 18, 19, 20, 30, 31, and 32). Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
07/07/2015 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change SUBJECT: OAKMORE SIX TENTATIVE PLAT
DP15-0091


Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the Tentative Plat for Oakmore Six subdivision submitted on June 15, 2015, and is unable to approve the plat at this time. Please show all existing TEP underground facilities that are located within the boundaries of the subdivision plat, as well as the overhead electrical line that is adjacent on the east side of the project. Also please identify the 10 foot electric easement extending east from Breakwell Street through Common Area A-1. (Recorded in Docket 10290 at Page 1164).


If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 520-917-8744.


Thank you,


Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Mail Stop HQE613
PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
07/08/2015 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal:
1. Add a general note stating: Refuse and recycling service is to be individual curbside service. Plastic containers (APCs) shall be placed and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service, and shall be stored from public view and adjacent developments.
If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net
07/08/2015 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Passed
07/09/2015 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved See additional documents in PRO

No objections/adverse comments. See attached



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy.
____________________________
Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP
Senior Land-Use Modeler





1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 495-1455 (tel)
(520) 620-6981 (fax)
www.pagregion.com
ekramer@pagregion.com
07/09/2015 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
07/09/2015 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Approved
07/10/2015 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) 4 rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approved this plan
07/10/2015 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Passed
07/10/2015 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Passed
07/10/2015 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
07/10/2015 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES CENTURYLINK Passed
07/10/2015 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/13/2015 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed