Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP13-0239
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/05/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Condition of approval met and verified by Patricia |
| 02/05/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Comments in first review were informational only. |
| 02/06/2014 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: 2/6/14 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DP13-0239 SIERRA MORADO UNIT 3 TENTATIVE (2ND SUBMITTAL) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THERE MUST BE BEARINGS & DIMENSIONS FOR ALL LOT LINES & COMMON AREAS & INFORMATION (RADIUS, CENTRAL ANGLE, LENGTH) FOR THE CURVES. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 02/06/2014 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: 2/12/14 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DP13-0239 SIERRA MORADO UNIT 3 TENTATIVE (2ND SUBMITTAL) AMENDED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 02/11/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 02/25/2014, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Sierra Morado Unit 3 DP13-0239, T15S, R15E, SECTION 12 RECEIVED: Development Plan Package and Drainage Report on February 05, 2014 The subject project has been reviewed. The project can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the plan and in the Drainage Report where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Specify which lots are affected by the Floodplain, the Wash and ERZ Standards. 2. When will the developer pursue a LOMR to get the lots impacted by the FEMA floodplain out of the floodplain? Before the LOMA is approved, Floodplain Use permits and Elevation Certificated will be required for all lots impacted by the floodplain. Development Package: 1. The Development Package can not be approved until the Drainage Reports comments have been satisfied. Landscape Plan, Geotechnical Report, SWPPP and ERR are acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package, ERR, SWPPP, Geotechnical Report, and Drainage Report |
| 02/18/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: DP13-0239 Sierra Morado Unit 3; Resubdivision Tentative Plat ; 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: February 18, 2014 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative Manual and the Technical Standards Manual were addressed. This tentative plat is also being review for compliance with the Planned Area Development (PAD 12) for Civano, Sierra Morado and Pavilions, along with the Memorandum of Understanding for Civano. Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 4th 2014. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. COMMENT: Provide the email address to all of the above. DONE 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. COMMENT: Provide the gang mailbox locations on the plans. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE SPECIFIC TO PAD 12: 1) Provide the following, in General Notes, that are specific to Sierra Morado in PAD 12: 2) Add to general note number 5 that: "This subdivision complies with the letter for the Minor Amendment for Target Density and Product Type of the Civano Planned Area Development (PAD), Sierra Morado - Unit 3: Dated December 17, 2013." DONE 3) "All structures shall be designed and constructed to comply with the Civano Model Energy Code Energy Standard and certified to have met these requirements by a professional in that field and indicated on the model plans, to include but not limited to compliance with MOU Sections 5.3.1.1, 5.3.1.3, 5.3.1.4, and 5.3.1.5." DONE 4) "Building plans for structures shall incorporate features for built in recyclable separation and storage of hazardous materials per MOU Section 5.3.8 which will be identified on the model plans." DONE 5) "The Developer, in conjunction with the Homeowners Association, shall explore with the City Solid Waste Department, a site for onsite recycling and composting per MOU Section 4.1.10." DONE 6) "The Developer shall establish a construction waste recycling program to the greatest extent possible throughout the construction phase of Development per MOU Section 5.3.1.6, and model building plans shall identify the recycled materials to be used in the construction of the structure per MOU Sections 5.3.1.6 and 5.3.9." DONE 7) "Building plans for all structures shall incorporate some recyclable construction materials and will be indentified on the model plans, per MOU Section 5.3.1.6." THIS STATEMENT IS A BIT DIFFERENT. IT DECLARES THAT THE MATERIALS MUST BE USED IN EACH MODEL. 8) "The project improvement plans shall include telecommunication conduits to allow future fiber optic or similar infrastructure expansion to commercial and home office locations per MOU Section 5.2.9. The current cable company (COX), shall provide high speed internet connection capability as part of their service package to all residential lots within Sierra Morado Unit 3." DONE 9) "Twenty percent (20%) of the eventual total number of all dwellings shall be priced for households at eighty percent (80%), or less, of the local median household income, to the extent that assistance from public agencies, foundations and other sources to finance and construct affordable housing per MOU Section 5.2.10 and revised Civano impact system standards. Conformance to the MOU Section 5.2.10 requirement is to be performed during the Annual Monitoring Report per MOU Sections 3.4 and 5.2." DONE 10) "Barrier-free accessibility for the elderly and physically disabled shall be provided to twenty-five percent (25%) of the ground floor units and all common areas, including all parking areas, within the project." Identify the specific lots that are barrier-free accessible. NOT REQUIRED. The comment is outdated and no longer relevant. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING A RESUBDIVISION: Re-platting a subdivision does not eliminate easements. Per Technical Standard Manual 11 quitclaim deeds or other abandonment documents must be provided from all utility companies prior to approval of the final plat. Technical Standard Manual 11 is not new, it was Development Standard 8. The quitclaims have to be dealt with before we send a replat to Mayor and Council. If the owner cannot or will not provide the quitclaim deeds, a note similar to the following must be added to the plat: "By the adoption of this plat, the City hereby abandons its interest in the easements created by the map or plat of ______________ Subdivision as recorded at the Pima County Recorder's Office, Pima County, Arizona, in Book __ at Page __. This action only affects the City's interest in said easements and does not affect any utility company's interest in and to the various easements created by said plat of _____________. Their respective interests can/should be addressed by a separate Abandonment or Quitclaim prior to development. " THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS REQUIRED. Check with Patricia Gehlen concerning this matter. There are no further comments at this time. |
| 02/26/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 February 13, 2014 To: Greg Carlson, P.E. Greg Carlson Engineering, Inc. ____________________________________________ From: Chad Amateau, P.E. (520-724-6547), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject Sierra Morado Unit 3 Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal DP13- 0239 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed and APPROVED the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced plan set. If you should have any questions regarding this review, please contact Chad Amateau at 724-6547. |
| 02/28/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a large scale detail of the van accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, markings, aisles, access to accessible route (ramps as required) and signage. a. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking signage including the van accessible signage. 2. At note 12 indicate the maximum slope percentages required by the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/03/2014 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | Tucson Parks and Recreation's comments regarding revised Plat Submittal for Sireea Morado Unit 3: 1) Regarding the Power Line Path Note 1.2 Novak Environmental's response to Loe Linville's comments: Design Standards for "Paths" are found in the Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan on pages 55 through 58. These standards should be specifically referenced on the plans. 2) Provide a section for the Powerline Path construction showing the same pavement cross section (2"AC/4"ABC with thickened edge both sides) as used for multi-use paths elsewhere in the project. 3) Regarding Note 1.3 Novak Environmental's response to Joe Linville's comments: Add a note in the plat's General Notes regarding the Powerline Path construction commencing when 75% of the houses in Sierra Morado Unit 3 are built. Thank you, Howard Dutt Howard B. Dutt, ASLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Fax: (520) 791-4008 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/04/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/06/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/07/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled copies of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items requested by review staff |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |