Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0001
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/18/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The on-premises SWPPP shall indicate the location(s) of concrete washout areas, as necessary. |
| 03/25/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Arizona Canning - Expansion Development Package (1st Review) Revised D09-0001 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 24, 2009 DUE DATE: April 13, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 26, 2010. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.4 Zoning acknowledges that the Pima County/ City of Tucson boundary has been corrected. The revised location map does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-01.3.4.C, provide the section corners on the location map. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.a Zoning acknowledges that an error was made on this comment the Case number for the Board of Adjustment should have been listed as C-10-00-73, provide the information as requested for case number C-10-00-73. As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval for the Board of Adjustment (BOA) for Variance #C9-00-23. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Zoning is unable to find the building area expansion calculation on the plan. Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B Zoning acknowledges that the easements have been shown on the plan. Provide the recordation information of all easements on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C Zoning acknowledges the ROW width dimension provided on the plan, show and provide dimensions for the future curbs and sidewalks on the plan. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F The zoning shown adjacent to the northeast property is not correct, this should be listed as RX-1. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F Show the zoning for the parcel shown as "U OF AZ INDUSTRIAL PARK", this should be listed as County Zoning CI-2. 9. Zoning acknowledges that a Board of Adjustment has been applied for. If approved provide the Board of Adjustment case number, date of approval and conditions of approval on the plan. The development package cannot be approved until the Board of Adjustment has been approved. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Zoning acknowledges that a Board of Adjustment for Variance, #C9-00-23, was approved for the existing development, D00-0059. This variance does not apply to the proposed expansion therefore per LUC Section 3.3.4, INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, Perishable Goods Manufacturing, parking must be provided at a ratio of one (1) space per five hundred (500) sq. ft. GFA of the expansion. 91,650/500 = 183 vehicle parking spaces required for the proposed expansion. Revise the calculation and show the require vehicle parking along with access to, on the plan. Provide the accessible vehicle parking for the new required vehicle parking as required be the International Building Code. Provide the required parking space details for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. 10. See comment 9 above. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d For any new vehicle parking spaces bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of 8%, 90% Class 1, 10% Class 2. Show the location on the plan and provide a bicycle parking calculation, required and provided, on the plan along with details for both Class 1 & Class 2 the meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.0 11. This comment was not addressed. If there are existing or proposed freestanding signs show them on the site plan. D.S. 2-05.3.9.V If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards on the plan. 12. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0001-2nd RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Arizona Canning - Expansion Grading Plan (2nd Review) T09BU00107 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 25, 2009 DUE DATE: April 13, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 04/02/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0001 Arizona Canning 4/2/09 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (X) Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-23 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: April 13, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XX ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 02/23/09 REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: March 31, 2009 |
| 04/06/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/16/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | approved last review |
| 04/17/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | It is understood that the existing service conditions that serve the existing development will be adequate to support the expansion needs as it pertains to solid waste disposal. In the future it would be necessary to identify the details of the exisitng conditions (whether previously approved or not) so ES can properly evaluate whether it can support future improvements/expansions. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/27/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0001 ARIZONA CANNING-FACILITY EXP/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/27/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Delete all street directions on Location Map. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 04/28/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 28, 2009 Jayme Wu Stellar 2900 Hartley Road Jacksonville, Florida 32257 Subject: D09-0001 Arizona Canning Facility Expansion Development Plan Dear Jayme: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the on-line comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blueline COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. AND 1 Rolled blueline set of the Development Plan. AND 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra rolled blueline set that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the rolled bluelines to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (904) 899-9435 dpapproved |