Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D09-0001
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/27/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/02/2009 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | January 30, 2009 To: JAYME WU STELLAR Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: ARIZONA CANNING COMPAY - PLANT EXPANSION Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D09-001 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 3: Revise General Note #3 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 02/05/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit any revised plans for review. Submit landscape plans for any portion of the site that may require new landscaping. |
| 02/10/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D09-0001 Arizona Canning () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (X) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-23 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: February 23, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( X ) Other - Color Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: February 3, 2009 1. Please list all rezoning conditions under the General Notes Section. 2. Please provide elevations with color designations of proposed expansion illustrating compatibility with existing structure on the site. All sides of buildings are to have similar architectural treatment which staff must verify. (Rezoning condition no. 14) 3. Provide a note to the General Notes section to read, "A 'fair disclosure' statement indicating that certain types of military air and ground training activity occur at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base and that the subject property is located within Territory in the vicinity of a Military Airport in accordance with state law, shall be included as part of any development plans, final plats, information brochures, and sale/rental agreements." (Rezoning Condition no. 8) |
| 02/13/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD Engineering recommends DENIAL of the development package and offers the following comments: 1. The SWPPP (T09BU00107) is inadequate and does not contain the necessary information for COT approval and conformance with ADEQ requirements. The following comments are offered: a. The consultant shall use the ADEQ "2008 Construction General Permit SWPPP Guidance Checklist" for preparation of the SWPPP and include a copy of the completed checklist with the next submittal. b. Please refer to the ADEQ website "http://www.azdeq.gov/function/forms /appswater.html#azpdes" for a copy of the SWPPP checklist. 2. A copy of the completed and signed NOI must be submitted with the SWPPP. The NOI must have the ADEQ-issued AZCON authorization number. It is recommended that ADEQ's Smart NOI system be used. The NOI and NOI instructions can be found on the fore-mentioned ADEQ website. 3. The City of Tucson requires the SWPPP to be sealed by an Arizona-registered P.E. (Civil). A resubmittal of the C-sheets and SWPPP is required. |
| 02/18/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Arizona Canning - Expansion Development Package (1st Review) Revised D09-0001 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 18, 2009 DUE DATE: February 23, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 26, 2009. 2. The following comments are based on the Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08. This review is a full code review for the areas of expansion only. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.1 If available provide the email addresses for owner, developer, architect, civil engineer and landscape registrant(s) on the plan. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.2 & D.S. 2-01.2.4 Provide a title block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet that includes the following: a. The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. b. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. c. The administrative street address. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.3 List the following reference case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet, "D09-0001, C9-00-23, C15-00-05, C10-00-73, D00-0059". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.4 The location map appears to have the Pima County/ City of Tucson boundary shown incorrectly. The location map shows this parcel within Pima County. Revise the location map to show the correct County/ City of Tucson boundary. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 List as a General Note "EXISTING ZONING IS I-2". 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 List as a General Note the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 List as a General Note the existing and proposed use o the property as "PERISHABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING "35", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.5.1 AND SEC. 3.5.5.2.A AND .B". 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.a As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval for the Board of Adjustment (BOA) for Variance #C9-00-23. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List as a General Note "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA; Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4,;Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). 12. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Provide the floor area for the existing building on the plan within the footprint. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a Floor Area Ration (FAR) calculation, including the allowed FAR and proposed FAR, on the plan. The FAR calculation will need to be broke out in two sections, one (1) for the Approach Departure Corridor 2 (ADC 2) area of the site and one (1) for the Approach Departure Corridor 1 (ADC 1) area of the site. See LUC Sections 2.8.5.8.B.1.c and 2.8.5.8.C.1.a for the allowed FAR. See LUC Section 3.2.11 for FAR calculation requirements. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, 16. width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should 17. be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 18. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been 19. abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any 20. proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of 21. plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C For all existing public right-of-way (ROW's) adjacent to the site provide the right-of-way width, both existing and future if applicable, dimension the curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 25. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Zoning acknowledges that a Board of Adjustment for Variance, #C9-00-23, was approved for the existing development, D00-0059. This variance does not apply to the proposed expansion therefore per LUC Section 3.3.4, INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, Perishable Goods Manufacturing, parking must be provided at a ratio of one (1) space per five hundred (500) sq. ft. GFA of the expansion. 91,650/500 = 183 vehicle parking spaces required for the proposed expansion. Revise the calculation and show the require vehicle parking along with access to, on the plan. Provide the accessible vehicle parking for the new required vehicle parking as required be the International Building Code. Provide the required parking space details for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. 26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.c The loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC 3.4.5.1 one (1) additional spaces is required for the expansion therefore the "REQUIRED" number of loading spaces should show seven (7). 27. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d For any new vehicle parking spaces bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of 8%, 90% Class 1, 10% Class 2. Show the location on the plan and provide a bicycle parking calculation, required and provided, on the plan along with details for both Class 1 & Class 2 the meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.0 28. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K If applicable show all proposed easements on the site plan. Dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be private or public. 29. D.S. 2-05.3.9.P Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure, existing and proposed, and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 30. D.S. 2-05.3.9.V If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards on the plan. 31. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D09-0001 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Arizona Canning - Expansion Grading Plan (1st Review) T09BU00107 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 18, 2009 DUE DATE: February 23, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T09BU00107 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 02/18/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Reference Zoning comments about additional parking spaces required due to expansion. As additional parking spaces are added, so will additional accessible parking spaces. I will review the newly adjusted parking lot with resubmission showing required additional parking, regular and accessible. |
| 02/19/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/20/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#207862 February 17, 2009 Steller Attn: Michael Mendoza 2900 Hartly Road Jacksonville FL 32257 To Mr. Mendoza : SUBJECT: Arizona Canning – Facility Expansion D09-0001 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 10, 2009 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8726 Please call the area Designer Warren McElyea at (520) 918-8268, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) W. McElyea Tucson Electric Power |
| 02/24/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | No provisions shown or mentioned for solid waste disposal/collection services. Refer to DS 6-01.0 Clarify how expansion will be supported within solid waste disposal requirements. Identify existing conditions with all appropriate dimensions/detail relating. Please include on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/25/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D09-0001 Arizona Canning - Facility Expansion/Development Plan DATE: February 25, 2009 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label project number on all sheets. Parcel property lines do not match project boundary lines on location map. Please correct. Correct jurisdiction lines on location map. Provide Title Block in lower right hand corner of plan on all sheets per Development Plan Standards. Include legal description (ie: being a portion of …) Delete address from Title on sheet 1. Delete duplicate call on legal description. Fill in missing direction on “89’25’40’W 1478.62…” in legal description. Delete address block from all sheets except sheet 1. |
| 02/25/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | Non-response agency |
| 02/25/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/26/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 25, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D09-0001 Arizona Canning - Facility Exp: Devlopement Plan: Development Plan(1/27/09) Staff has no comments. |
| 03/06/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 6, 2009 Jayme Wu Stellar 2900 Hartley Road Jacksonville Florida 32257 Subject: D09-0001 Arizona Canning Facility Expansion Development Plan Dear Jayme: Your submittal of January 27, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 7 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Package (DUPD, Engineering, Zoning, ADA, ESD, Addressing, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (904) 899-9435 dp-resubmittal |