Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: TP-PRE-0824-00182
Parcel: 13213078B

Review Status: Approved

Review Details: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1

Plan Number - TP-PRE-0824-00182
Review Name: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Approved
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Entitlements REVIEW COMPLETED REZONING/SPECIAL EXCEPTION
PRESUBMITTAL PREAPPLICATION REVIEW
DATE: 08/28/24
REVIEWED BY: Samuel Paz, Lead Planner
CASE NUMBER: TP-PRE-0824-00182
PROJECT ADDRESS: Multiple locations
PARCEL NUMBERS: Multiple parcels and intersections
EXISTING ZONING & LAND USE: R-1, O-1, C-1, C-2
PROPOSED LAND USE: UTILITY USE (PERPENDICULAR CROSSINGS)

PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION:
This request is for special exception from the undergrounding requirements of UDC section 5.5.4 of the Gateway Corridor overlay zone for 3 perpendicular crossing sites for electrical transmission lines as part of the applicant’s Midtown Reliability Project (MRP). The perpendicular crossings include 3 intersection sites (1-3). Site 1 is located at the intersection of Grant and Oracle. Site 2 is located at Broadway and Euclid. Site 3 is located at 36th street and South Kino Parkway. The applicant is seeking a special exception request specific to UDC section 3.4.5 and 4.9.11.

APPLICANT NAME: Brian Pugh
PHONE: (520) 460-6417 E-MAIL: BPUGH@TEP.COM
Plan Amendment :NO
PLAN SUPPORT BASED ON CONCEPT PRESENTED (SEE NOTES BELOW):
WILL DEPEND ON DESIGN
DESIGN COMPATIBILITY

PLAN DIRECTION
ADOPTED PLAN(S): Plan Tucson, University Area Plan, Kino Area Plan, Unit-6, Arroyo-Chico,
PLAN AMENDMENT NO, ADDITIONAL INFO REQUIRED (SEE NOTES BELOW)
APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES:
Plan Tucson
The site of the proposed special exception is covered by Plan Tucson.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Rezoning – Planning & Development Services Pre-submittal Review Page 2 of 5
TP-PRE-0824-00182– Multiple Sites (Ward 3,5,6)
Plan Tucson: The Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map illustrates different Building Blocks within the city that have specific policies to promote future growth opportunities. The proposed development lies within numerous Building Blocks within the Future Growth Scenario Map.
Site 1: Existing Neighborhoods and Industrial
Site 2: Downtown and Existing Neighborhoods
Site 3: Existing Neighborhoods
• LT27 Using existing neighborhood, area, and other specific plans as the starting point, undertake an inclusive public process to explore the concept of developing and implementing planning and service areas to coordinate and enhance land use planning, infrastructure improvements, and public service delivery.
• PI7 Coordinate with utility companies and other public service providers for the planning of infrastructure, facilities, and services, making sure infrastructure and facility construction is sensitive in design and location to environmental and historic resources.
• LT28.1.1 Utilize solutions and strategies included in the Design Guidelines Manual to provide an improved level of community design.
• LT28.1.2 Require telecommunications facilities be located, installed, and maintained to minimize visual impact and preserve views. Cabling and fiber optics should be installed underground where possible, and the visual impact of cellular towers should be a prime consideration in the City’s acceptance and approval.
• LT28.1.3 Improve the appearance of above-ground utilities and structures and extend access to high-tech wireless communications facilities throughout the city.
• LT28.2.12 Support environmentally sensitive design that protects the integrity of existing neighborhoods, complements adjacent land uses, and enhances the overall function and visual quality of the street, adjacent properties, and the community.
• LT28.2.14 Protect established residential neighborhoods by supporting compatible development, which may include other residential, mixed-use infill and appropriate nonresidential uses.
Site 1- Perpendicular Crossing 4.9.11.A.13D
The proposed overhead transmission lines are located on a non-Gateway or non-scenic corridor route (Grant Road) and will perpendicularly cross Gateway 317 and 117 via Oracle Road intersection. The proposed crossing location is zoned C-2 Commercial at the Grant and Oracle intersection.
The Unit 6 Plan was prepared at the request of the Mayor and Council to complete the planning process initiated by the Model Cities program, to respond to rezoning requests received from the area, and to assess the development potential of the area.
The plan's primary objective is to stabilize the balance of residential, commercial, and industrial uses and remove some of the circulation conflicts experienced by area residents.
The subject site is identified as High Intensity Commercial and the proposed crossing location aligns with the goals and policies within this area plan.
Rezoning – Planning & Development Services Pre-submittal Review Page 3 of 5
TP-PRE-0824-00182– Multiple Sites (Ward 3,5,6)
Site 2- Perpendicular Crossing – 4.9.11.A.13D
The proposed overhead transmission lines are located on a non-Gateway or non-scenic corridor (Euclid Road) route and will perpendicularly cross a Gateway Corridor via the Broadway Boulevard intersection. The proposed crossing location is zoned C-2 Commercial with R-3 to the North and I-1 to the south.
The University Area Plan (UAP) and Arroyo Chico Area Plan (ACAP) establish future land use and development direction for areas that include both the University area and the Arroyo Chico areas. Both area plans convene along and are separated by Broadway Boulevard and provide the following plan policies:
University Area Plan
Office Commercial
Section 6: Public Services Goal: Ensure an adequate supply of high-quality public services to meet the current and projected needs of University Area residents and businesses.
3. Encourage government agencies and utility providers to coordinate the planning and development of projects in order to maximize efficiency while minimizing neighborhood disruption.
4. Encourage government agencies and utility providers to consult with representatives from registered neighborhood associations and Historic District Review Boards in the early stages of project planning to ensure that projects are designed to enhance the character and quality of each neighborhood.
6. Wherever possible, place utility and service equipment underground or in other visually screened locations.
Arroyo Chico Area Plan
2. Encourage a compatible mix of residential, industrial, and business uses in the plan area, while protecting the integrity of existing neighborhoods.
3. Protect neighborhoods from truck traffic and roadway improvements, while allowing industrial and business access to key transportation routes.
Industrial Areas- Policy 2
B. Require compliance with the Gateway Route guidelines specified in the Major Streets and Routes Plan or Gateway Route ordinance, when adopted (specifically along the southern frontage of Broadway Boulevard).
The subject site is identified as Industrial Area and the proposed crossing location, with the proposed conditions as to undergrounding existing distribution lines, aligns with the goals and policies within this area plan.
Site 3- Perpendicular Crossing 4.9.11.A.13D Waiver
The applicant is requesting a waiver from the 150’ setback distance and intends to utilize existing infrastructure located on a non-Gateway or non-scenic corridor (Kino Parkway) route and will perpendicularly cross a Gateway Corridor via the 36th Street intersection. However, the 150’ setback requirement is not waivable under this special exception process as it is a required finding for grant of the undergrounding special exception relief. However, use of the existing 46kV transmission line poles may allow for special exception relief in this area because the proposed overhead transmission line will have minimal impact on residential areas, thereby possibly meeting the required findings (a) and (c) under UDC 4.9.11.A.13. The proposed crossing location is zoned PAD-15 South of 36th and R-2 north of 36th.
Kino Area Plan and Greater South Park Area Plan establish future land use and development direction for areas that include both the Kino area and the South Park areas. Both area plans convene along and are separated by 36th Street and provide the following plan policies:
Greater South Park Area Plan
As the Tucson region grows and the improvements to Kino Boulevard and State Route 21G are completed, the pressure for change and intensification of uses along these major streets will increase. Generally, these kinds of changes are expected and encouraged as long as the negative impacts of these new developments on surrounding uses can be mitigated.
Utilities
l. Provide adequate utility service capacity in the plan area by:
B. planning for additional utility service as the plan area develops.
Transportation Improvements and Traffic Circulation
l. Upgrade the appearance of the built environment along Kino Boulevard by utilizing the Gateway guidelines as specified in the Major Streets and Routes Plan or a Gateway Route ordinance, when adopted.
The subject area is within subarea 5 of the area plan and divided by Kino Boulevard. Due to improved access, central location, and availability of utilities, the vacant land in this subarea has the potential for the development of a combination of residential, commercial, and industrial uses. The proposed crossing location is zoned PAD-15 to the south.
Kino Area Plan
The subject area is within site 1 commercial of the area plan and divided by Kino Boulevard.

ANALYSIS:
Plan policy generally supports perpendicular crossings sites 1 and 2 based on location and minimal overlap with a GCZ. Plan policy generally supports routes “B” “1” and “4” alignment as proposed in the approved Certificate of Environmental Compatibility (CEC). The preferred routes are “B” and “1”, running generally down Grant to Park then to the Vine substation, from the Vine substation down Euclid to 36th st and the Kino substation. Reviewers note that the provided map reverses the labeling of the approved routes and requests that the map labeling be corrected to be consistent with the CEC prior to any submittal.
Site 3 is requesting a waiver per UDC 4.9.11.13 D, which should demonstrate placement of poles 150 feet from curbline of GCZ.
Procedurally, a “single” preferred route must be presented at the neighborhood meeting and Zoning Examiner Public Hearing. Additionally, staff report and recommended conditions for the Vine substation are still relevant and applicable but must reference a single route. Staff also recommends grouping sites 1, 2 and 3 perpendicular crossings together, and submitting the Vine substation separately for the Zoning Examiner public hearings. Further, staff requests a crossing boundary (shapefile) to notice the 400’ from each perpendicular crossing. Additionally, in the neighborhood meetings and DCR, please address how: 1) any new above-ground transmission line that is permitted will be designed, constructed, and maintained to be as unobtrusive as possible; and 2) any existing distribution and transmission lines within the same right of way will be undergrounded.

Plan support based on the concept plan will depend on design and feedback gathered at the neighborhood meeting(s). More design consideration is required to ensure sensitive design of nonresidential developments adjacent to established neighborhoods.
ADDITIONAL: NA
..............................................................................................................................................
REZONING/SPECIAL EXCEPTION
PRESUBMITTAL PREAPPLICATION REVIEW
DATE: 08/28/24
REVIEWED BY: Samuel Paz, Lead Planner
CASE NUMBER: TP-PRE-0824-00182
PROJECT ADDRESS: Campbell Alignment
PARCEL NUMBERS: Multiple parcels and intersections
EXISTING ZONING & LAND USE: R-1, O-1, C-1, C-2
PROPOSED LAND USE: UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION RELIEF WITHIN A GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE
PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION:
This request is for a special exception for undergrounding transmission relief within a Gateway Corridor Zone alignment for electrical transmission lines. The submittal includes 1 parallel alignment within a Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ) parallel to Campbell starting near the Cherry Field Park (E. 14th Street) and terminating at the Grant and Campbell intersection. The applicant is seeking a special exception request specific to UDC section 3.4.5 and 4.9.11.
APPLICANT NAME: Brian Pugh
PHONE: (520) 460-6417 E-MAIL: BPUGH@TEP.COM

Plan Amendment: NO
PLAN SUPPORT BASED ON CONCEPT PRESENTED (SEE NOTES BELOW):
NO

PLAN DIRECTION
ADOPTED PLAN(S): Plan Tucson, University Area Plan, Craig Keeling, Arroyo-Chico,
PLAN AMENDMENT NO, ADDITIONAL INFO REQUIRED (SEE NOTES BELOW)
APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES:
Plan Tucson
The site of the proposed special exception is covered by Plan Tucson.

Plan Tucson: The Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map illustrates different Building Blocks within the city that have specific policies to promote future growth opportunities. The proposed development lies within numerous Building Blocks within the Future Growth Scenario Map.
Site 4: Existing Neighborhoods, Campus Areas and Mixed-Use Corridors
• LT27 Using existing neighborhood, area, and other specific plans as the starting point, undertake an inclusive public process to explore the concept of developing and implementing planning and service areas to coordinate and enhance land use planning, infrastructure improvements, and public service delivery.
• PI7 Coordinate with utility companies and other public service providers for the planning of infrastructure, facilities, and services, making sure infrastructure and facility construction is sensitive in design and location to environmental and historic resources.
• LT28.1.1 Utilize solutions and strategies included in the Design Guidelines Manual to provide an improved level of community design.
• LT28.1.2 Require telecommunications facilities be located, installed, and maintained to minimize visual impact and preserve views. Cabling and fiber optics should be installed underground where possible, and the visual impact of cellular towers should be a prime consideration in the City’s acceptance and approval.
• LT28.1.3 Improve the appearance of above-ground utilities and structures and extend access to high-tech wireless communications facilities throughout the city.
• LT28.2.12 Support environmentally sensitive design that protects the integrity of existing neighborhoods, complements adjacent land uses, and enhances the overall function and visual quality of the street, adjacent properties, and the community.
• LT28.2.14 Protect established residential neighborhoods by supporting compatible development, which may include other residential, mixed-use infill and appropriate nonresidential uses.

Site 4- Paralleling
The University Area Plan, Cragin - Keeling Area Plan and Arroyo Chico Area Plan establish future land use and development direction for areas that include both the University area and the Arroyo Chico areas.
ANALYSIS:
Further review of 4.9.11.a13, states “A special exception request to relieve the requirements to underground transmission lines that meets the findings of UDC section 3.4.5 Findings which also meets the criteria “a, d, or f” of this subsection may only require one criterion for approval when no other criteria apply”. The proposal as presented fails to justify Criteria “a” “d” or “f”.
a. The proposed overhead transmission line will have minimal impact on residential areas.
• Overhead transmission lines are not contextually sensitive to the residential zoning.
R-1, NR-2, R-2 abuts most of the Campbell frontage and the alignment may also impact the Sam Hughes Historic District and historic structures east of Campbell.

b. Requiring underground construction would cause a significant increase in ground disturbance when compared to overhead construction in sensitive areas such as Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) or Watercourse Amenities, Safety and Habitat (WASH) wash crossings or environmentally and archeologically sensitive areas.
Not Applicable
c. The proposed overhead transmission line will have minimal impact on residential areas
Not Applicable
d. proposed overhead transmission lines are located on non-Gateway or non-Scenic corridor routes, and the relief is requested for a segment that perpendicularly crosses a Gateway Corridor Zone or Scenic Corridor Zone, and the placement of poles is set back at least 150 feet from the curbline of the designated Gateway or Scenic Corridor.
Not Applicable
e. The proposed overhead transmission lines are for a repair or upgrade of existing facilities and the proposed facilities are similar in size and scale to the existing facilities being repaired or replaced. Replacement facilities may not be any larger than 10% the height or width of existing facilities being replaced.
Not Applicable
f. The transmission lines are proposed in an area where there is an existing presence of railroad, highway and/or bridge crossings, or in an area where underground installation would interfere with other existing undergrounded utilities, and curing that interference is technologically impossible or financially cost prohibitive.
Not Applicable
g. The proposed transmission lines will provide electrical service to critical customers where overhead lines are strongly recommended for specialized operations; examples include but are not limited to: provision of electricity to Davis Monthan AFB or other installations necessary to the national defense.
Not Applicable
h. The proposed project is in an area where costs to install underground would have a disparate impact on low-income residents.
Not Applicable
Additionally, Special exception relief is not supported for Site 4, as it does not meet the required findings for the relief requested. Any request for underground relief ultimately needs to demonstrate that the above grounding will have a less adverse impact than underground installation.
ADDITIONAL PLAN POLICIES TO CONSIDER:
3.4.5. FINDINGS
A. Findings for all PDSD Director and Zoning Examiner Special Exceptions
To grant a special exception the PDSD Director and the Zoning Examiner must find that the requested special exception:
1. Meets the standard expressly applied by all adopted by all codes and regulations for that type of land use or for the land use class applicable to the proposed use;
Rezoning – Planning & Development Services Pre-submittal Review Page 4 of 4
TP-PRE-0824-00182– Multiple Sites (Ward 3,5,6)
2. Does not adversely affect adjacent land uses or the surrounding neighborhood or that such adverse effects can be substantially mitigated through the use of additional conditions as provided in Section 3.4.6;
3. Provides for adequate and efficient vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation and vehicular parking;
4. Can be adequately and efficiently served by public facilities and services, such as water, storm water drainage, fire and police protection, and solid and liquid waste disposal and/or collection as may be required by the various public and private agencies; and,
5. Complies with the General Plan and any applicable sub-regional, area, or neighborhood plan.
..............................................................................................................................................
REZONING/SPECIAL EXCEPTION
PRESUBMITTAL PREAPPLICATION REVIEW
DATE: 08/28/24
REVIEWED BY: Samuel Paz, Lead Planner
CASE NUMBER: TP-PRE-0824-00182
PROJECT ADDRESS: Unaddressed
PARCEL NUMBERS: 123-100-001C
EXISTING ZONING & LAND USE: R-2
PROPOSED ZONING: R-2
PROPOSED LAND USE: UTILITY SUBSTATION
PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION:
This request is for special exception for an electrical transmission substation. This special exception request is for a proposed substation from a previously denied special exception (SE-20-16), which was denied due to lack of clarity regarding the final routing. The proposed substation is located on Lee Street and Vine Avenue, west of UMC Banner. The proposed substation is included within TEP’s two proposed routes for the Midtown Reliability Project between Kino and DMP. The applicant is seeking a special exception request specific to UDC section 3.4.5 and 4.9.11.
APPLICANT NAME: Brian Pugh
PHONE: (520) 460-6417 E-MAIL: BPUGH@TEP.COM
Plan Amendment: NO
PLAN SUPPORT BASED ON CONCEPT PRESENTED (SEE NOTES BELOW):
WILL DEPEND ON DESIGN
DESIGN COMPATIBILITY + COMMUNITY INPUT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE REPORT
PLAN DIRECTION
ADOPTED PLAN(S): Plan Tucson, University Area Plan,
PLAN AMENDMENT NO, ADDITIONAL INFO REQUIRED (SEE NOTES BELOW)
APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES:
Plan Tucson
The site of the proposed special exception is covered by Plan Tucson.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Rezoning – Planning & Development Services Pre-submittal Review Page 2 of 4
TP-PRE-0824-00182– Multiple Sites (Ward 3,5,6)
Plan Tucson: The Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map illustrates different Building Blocks within the city that have specific policies to promote future growth opportunities. The proposed development lies within numerous Building Blocks within the Future Growth Scenario Map.
Vine Substation: Campus Areas
• LT27 Using existing neighborhood, area, and other specific plans as the starting point, undertake an inclusive public process to explore the concept of developing and implementing planning and service areas to coordinate and enhance land use planning, infrastructure improvements, and public service delivery.
• PI7 Coordinate with utility companies and other public service providers for the planning of infrastructure, facilities, and services, making sure infrastructure and facility construction is sensitive in design and location to environmental and historic resources.
• LT28.1.1 Utilize solutions and strategies included in the Design Guidelines Manual to provide an improved level of community design.
• LT28.1.2 Require telecommunications facilities be located, installed, and maintained to minimize visual impact and preserve views. Cabling and fiber optics should be installed underground where possible, and the visual impact of cellular towers should be a prime consideration in the City’s acceptance and approval.
• LT28.1.3 Improve the appearance of above-ground utilities and structures and extend access to high-tech wireless communications facilities throughout the city.
• LT28.2.12 Support environmentally sensitive design that protects the integrity of existing neighborhoods, complements adjacent land uses, and enhances the overall function and visual quality of the street, adjacent properties, and the community.
• LT28.2.14 Protect established residential neighborhoods by supporting compatible development, which may include other residential, mixed-use infill and appropriate nonresidential uses.
Surrounding Zones and Land Uses:
North: Zoned NR-1; Neighborhood Preservation Zone, Single-Family Residential
Existing Uses: UA Facilities Management & Maintenance Operations
South: Zoned R-2; Single-Family Residential & Multi-Family Residential
Existing Uses: TEP 46kv open-air electric substation & UA 46kv gas-insulated substation
East: Zoned R-2 and PAD-28; Single-Family Residential & Multi-Family
Residential, Banner Planned Area Development
Existing Uses: Banner Medical Center, staff parking garage (5-stories)
West: Zoned R-2; Single-Family Residential & Multi-Family Residential
Existing Uses: Single- & Multi -Family residences (1- and 2-stories)

Vine Substation
University Area Plan supports government agencies and utility providers to coordinate the planning and development of projects in order to maximize efficiency while minimizing neighborhood disruption.
The goal of the University Area Plan is to provide land use policy direction and design guidelines for development within the Plan boundary.
Section 6: Public Services
Goal: Ensure an adequate supply of high-quality public services to meet the current and projected needs of University Area residents and businesses.
3. Encourage government agencies and utility providers to coordinate the planning and development of projects in order to maximize efficiency while minimizing neighborhood disruption.
4. Encourage government agencies and utility providers to consult with representatives from registered neighborhood associations and Historic District Review Boards in the early stages of project planning to ensure that projects are designed to enhance the character and quality of each neighborhood.
5. Support the inclusion of neighborhood amenities (e.g., open space, recreational facilities, public art) in the development of new public facilities and infrastructure.
6. Wherever possible, place utility and service equipment underground or in other visually screened locations.
ANALYSIS:
The proposal for the Vine Substation now includes two alternative routing alignments along Grant Avenue. Route “D” extends to Campbell, while route “B” extends to Grant Road via Park Avenue. Additionally, there two alternative routes from the Vine substation traveling south: 1) Route 1 travels along Adams from Vine to Park Avenue and heads south to Speedway. The route then heads west on Speedway to Euclid and south ultimately terminating at the Kino substation; and 2) Route 4 travels east along Lester to Campbell and then south along the Gateway Corridor terminating at the same location as route 1.
The Vine Substation submittal should reference the application and conditions of the 2021 Special Exception request and provide the additional information as highlighted in the Zoning Examiner’s final report. Procedurally, a “single” preferred route must be presented at the neighborhood meeting and Zoning Examiner Public Hearing. See TP-PRE-0724-0017 for Sites 1-3 and Site 4 for support or comments on the routes described above. Additionally, in the neighborhood meetings and DCR, please address how any new above-ground transmission line that is permitted will be designed, constructed, and maintained to be as unobtrusive as possible. Any design should align with previous DRB comments including landscaping and buffering.
Plan support based on concept plan will depend on design and feedback gathered at the neighborhood meeting. More design consideration may be required to ensure sensitive design of nonresidential developments adjacent to established neighborhoods.
ADDITIONAL PLAN POLICIES TO CONSIDER:
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED TP-PRE-0824-00182 • Pre-Application Conference Review v1 • 1602 N VINE AV TUCSON, AZ 85719:
Based on the information provided, TFD has no comments at this time.
Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED Site Engineering has no objections to the proposed project. However, any instance of work within a regulatory floodplain will require a floodplain use permit.

Mike Ortiz
michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED Site Landscape/NPPO Section Review Comments:

1. If protected native plants are going to be disturbed during the construction phase of this project, then an NPPO may be required to show mitigation of the disturbed native plants. Site Landscape/NPPO have no other comments or concerns at this time with this Special Exception.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED Special Exception Pre-Submittal Transmittal

FROM: Nicholas Martell
PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Rezoning Pre-submittal meeting TP-PRE-0824-00182
Address: 1602 N VINE AV, 1740 E 36th st.
Existing Use: Utilities – Distribution System

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 28, 2024

COMMENTS:
1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package, and 2-03 -PDP. Please ensure the next submittal has all the standards addressed here: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-8416
a. Two separate special exception applications are required.
2. Proposed use and use-specific standards:
a. Vine Substation: R-2 Zoning, Subject to Zoning Examiner Special Exception Procedure with adherence to 4.9.11.A.1, .2, .5, .8, .9, .11, .12
b. Gateway Corridor Zone uses: Per UDC 5.5.3 A zoning examiner special exception procedure is required per UDC 4.9.11.A.12. Please adhere to UDC 5.5.4

3. Additional comments:
a. Per city attorneys, lines are to be underground at Broadway BL.
b. The lines running along Campbell are in the Gateway Corridor Zone (UDC 5.5.2)

4. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards.

If you have any questions, please contact me at nicholas.martell@tucsonaz.gov.
Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED No feedback from DTM Traffic Engineering division.