Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1222-00337
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2024 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 02/07/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 02/28/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/19/2024 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | A revised Design Package reflecting the proposed changes included under TC-COM-1222-00337 must be submitted for review/approval. Review by Design Professional is below. Please contact me if there are any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. DATE: February 18, 2024 FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992) COT On-Call Design Professional RE: IID Design Package Minor Modification 1-3 Compatibility Review w/ the revised TC-COM-1222-00337; MGD-20-02, The Hub 5 I have reviewed the Main Gate District CDs revision for Compatibility with the approved Design Package and Minor Modifications 1-3 for The Hub 5 last submitted July 2023 for the purpose of determining its conformance with the Design Requirements of the MGD Ordinance 11394. I have checked the submittal against the relevant submittal requirements of Section C-19. Submittal Requirements - Status Building Materials and Colors . C-19.d. Building materials should be chosen for their tactile effects and used in a contrasting manner: e.g., rough surfaces against smooth, vertical patterns against horizontal, etc. -- Complies. . C-19.e. Building materials should be local chosen for integral colors and their visual and physical permanence in the Sonoran Desert. -- Complies. . C-19.f. Building materials should be selected with the idea of localizing the architectural effect and ambiance in a method coherent with the neighborhood. -- Complies. . C-19.g. Architectural metals, such as metal panel systems, metal sheets with expressed seams, metal-framing systems, or cut, stamped or cast, ornamental metal panels. -- Complies. . C-19.h. Building materials used at the lower floors adjacent to the street frontage should respond to the character of the pedestrian environment through such qualities as scale, texture, color and detail. -- Complies. . C-19.i. Combinations of materials should reinforce architectural scaling requirements. -- Complies. . C-19.j. The use of color should be compatible with the historic traditions of the University of Arizona, City of Tucson, and adjacent historic neighborhoods. Accent colors should be used consistently throughout the building: in signage, architectural features, lighting, window frames, doors and accent walls. -- Complies. C-19.l. Architectural elements such as balconies, outdoor stairs, ornaments and surface details, such as screening, cladding and fenestration, shall be used to enhance the architectural style of the building. For group dwellings, balconies shall not be allowed. -- Complies. . C-19.m. Architectural elements should take into consideration appropriateness of use, scale, proportion, color and texture. -- Complies. . C-19.n. Architectural details shall be carefully integrated in the concept design of the building. -- Complies. . C-19.o. There shall be a clear visual distinction between the ground floor and upper floors. -- Complies. General Comments: 1. The revision to the building plans change the plans so that they do not match the last approved design package. I recommend submittal of a revision to the design package, SD-0523-00048, so that the resubmittted building plans, TC-COM-1222- 0037, and the design package with the subsequent 3 modifications, SD-0523- 00048, match or provide a design package 4 modification. This comment also applies to the last approved Development Package under DP20-0152. I Recommend submittal of a Minor Modification 4 Design Package relative to the reviewed revised building plans under TC-COM-1222-00337 because the South building elevation is not compliant with the Revision 3 Design Package and does not match the Revision 3 Design Package. The plans as presented are not in conformance with the MGD Ordinance 11394. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez, Architect (RGA) |
||
| 02/28/2024 | External Reviewers - Stantec | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Project under building review by Stantec, submittal of approved Stantec construction documents required. Please contact Doris.Benoit@tucsonaz.gov for additional information. | ||
| 02/05/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The revision to the building plans change the plans so that they do not match the approved development package. Submit a revision to the development package, DP20-0152, so that the building plans and the development package match. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/23/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/09/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |