Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - DP22-0266
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/08/2022 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | APPROVED | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC 11/03/2022 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard Dutt, RLA Project Manager/Landscape Architect Parks and Recreation | City of Tucson Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov main 520.631.2030 |
||
11/10/2022 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | APPROVED | See letter from TAA in attachments. | ||
11/21/2022 | Traffic Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments | ||
11/14/2022 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | NOT REQUIRED | Please remove Pima County Addressing from the review queue for DP22-0266. The project does not require review. | ||
11/09/2022 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | No NPPO required | ||
12/01/2022 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
11/02/2022 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The branch of the building sewer connected to the sand oil separator is not protected by a backwater valve. Are the fixtures discharging to the sand oil separator located 12” or more above the rim elevation of manhole 5444-20A? Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. | ||
12/01/2022 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Plans shall show the location of the FDC's, the F.D.C. shall be located on the street side in compliance with IFC 2018, Chapter 9, Section 912.2.1 Buildings greater than 30’ require aerial access to the building be provided IFC 2018, Appendix D 26’ wide drive and 15-30' from the building unobstructed. Areas noted as fire department aerial access shall also be on the plans with a note that reads: Fire Department Aerial access, no trees, canopies, solar shades or other obstructions shall ever be installed/planted in this area. This plan shall be included in you DP package and not submitted to TFD individually. Plans shall show all existing and new fire hydrant locations Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
||
11/10/2022 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1 including name, address, email address, and phone number. 2. Show a complete pedestrian circulation path including from the proposed building out to both Sears and Campbell. 3. Show how this site is maximizing water harvesting if any additional landscaping is required from what is shown per landscaping comments. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
11/09/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Eprioc, Phase III ACTIVITY NO: DP22-0266 Address: 6393 S Campbell Av1949 E Valencia Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: Construction/Heavy Equipment Proposed Use: No change TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2022 DUE DATE: November 15, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of less than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. 2. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized on both water harvesting and grading plans. 3. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 4. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 5. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands. 6. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 7. The basin floor requires something other than bare dirt, hydroseed or rock larger than 4” is acceptable. 8. Demonstrate how the approved landscape plan meets the 10’ street landscape border requirements along both Sears Blvd. and Campbell Ave. Both landscape borders need additional plant material. 9. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 10. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 11. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g. 12. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 13. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 14. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
11/01/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Epiroc Phase III Development Package (1st Review) DP22-0266 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2022 DUE DATE: November 02, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 13, 2023. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 – Remove the old Development Package PDSD Approval stamp from sheet 7 & 8 as it is not applicable any more. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP22-0266, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met for the north, east and the area north of the proposed accessible parking space and along the south end of the southernmost parking space. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.3.B are met. Zoning acknowledges that TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B.2 may apply, clearly show the required refuge areas on the plan. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Cleary demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A are met from the proposed building to both Campbell & Sears. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |