Permit: DP13-0012
Permit Details
Apply Date:
01/22/2013
Applicant:
Description:
GRADING
Permit Reviews
Permit Number - DP13-0012
Permit Status: Complete
Permit Description: GRADING
| Start Date | Submittal | Complete Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2013 | DEV PKG - OK TO SUBMIT (GRADING ONLY) | 01/22/2013 | COMPLETED |
| 01/22/2013 | GRADING | 03/28/2013 | COMPLETED |
| 01/22/2014 | REVISION - GRADING | 01/24/2014 | ACTIVE |
Outstanding Activity Conditions
Permit Number - DP13-0012
Permit Status: Complete
Permit Description: GRADING
Total Outstanding Activity Conditions - 1
| Date | Name |
|---|---|
| 01/30/2013 | The following 11 conditions apply to permits T12OT01659 and DP13-0012:1)PDSD Engineering Inspections are required prior to final floodplain inspection. For a PDSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or contact PDSD Engineering at 837-4991, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html2)See also any associated building permit (T12CM07840), and grading permit (DP13-0012).3)To assess cumulative substantial improvement, cost estimate ($1,537,321.00) was provided showing that the improvements are less than 50% indicating a cumulative total percentage of 9.3% of the assessed value of the structure, as shown on data provided by the consultant. No person shall repair or alter property in a piecemeal manner so as to avoid the provisions of Section 26-4.1.a.3, Chapter 26-Tucson Code. The estimate will be recorded and any future improvements will be added to it.Estimated cost of improvement (renovation and new construction) = $1,537,321.00Assessed value of the existing structure = $16,532,820.00 (bldg)Cumulative percentage of improvements to the existing structure:$1,537,321/ $16,532,820 = 9.3%4)Floodplain Use Permit & plans shall be kept in readily accessible location on site at all times. Within 5 (five) days of issuance of this permit, and through completion of the project, notification must be posted and maintained in a conspicuous place on the job site stating "CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDING UNDER REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF TUCSON FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT # T12OT01659. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE CALL 791-5550."5)All future improvements to each structure will be cumulative in percentage, to include this project. 6)The proposed improvements shall not impose conditions that would increase the flood damage potential to the combined proposed and existing building, by 50 percent or greater of the existing structure's value.7)When the cumulative improvements equal or exceed 50% of the current value of the structure; no other improvements will be permitted unless the entire structure is brought into compliance with the City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations (Chapter 26, Tucson Code). If the project is determined to be a substantial improvement, and, if it is determined that the lowest flood elevation is below the regulatory floor elevation, a design submittal, and review and acceptance of the submittal for floodproofing will be required and shall conform to current City of Tucson and FEMA floodplain development requirements in effect on the date of authorization by the Development Services Department.8)No disturbance is permitted other than area within the lot and as shown on the approved plans. Except as approved by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction, development under this permit shall not obstruct, retard or divert the existing flow of floodwaters from or to adjacent properties. 9)This permit becomes invalid and is subject to additional floodplain review, if any required development permit changes the configuration of the improvement, or, if there is any further disturbance within the floodplain other than that outlined in this application. This floodplain use permit may be subject to conditions or restrictions designed to reduce or mitigate the potential damage or hazard to life or property resulting from development within the regulatory floodplain, floodway or erosion hazard areas as determined by the project engineer and accepted by the City of Tucson.10)The applicant attests to the fact that the plans and documents submitted represent all of the improvements that will be done to the existing building, and that all additions, improvements or repairs to the building are included in the construction plans and/or documents herewith. No other improvements, repairs, reconstruction, additions or remodeling have been made to the structure that is not indicated in the attached plans and/or documents.11)If any walls are to be built, separate permits are required, at-grade wall openings will be needed, & will need to be inspected by City of Tucson PDSD Engineering. |
Completed Inspections
Permit Status: Complete
Permit Number: DP13-0012
Permit Description: GRADING
Total Completed Inspections - 8
| Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2013 | COT - ENGR - Site - Assurance Release | Passed | {Activity date: 04/12/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - MET WITH SUPERINTENDENT: 1) CONSTRUCTION ON SITE IS LESS THAN 1 ACRE, THEREFORE NO STORM WATER PERMIT IS NEEDED. HOWEVER, DISTURBED SOIL MUST REMAIN ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 2) CALL FOR RE-INSPECTION FOR TRASH ENCLOSURE FOTTINGS 3) CALL FOR INSPECTION FOR ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO YOUR GRADING PLAN 4) CALL FOR INSPECTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL} ; {Activity date: 04/10/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - PRE-CON WITH MIKE RUSSO SET FOR 4/11/2013.} ; {Activity date: 04/09/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - PRE-CON INSPECTION ADDED FOR THIS SITE.} |
|
| 04/25/2013 | SITE - Stormwater Setup and Controls | Passed | {Activity date: 04/25/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - SEDIMENT CONTROLS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. NO SIGNIFICANT STORM WATER CONCERNS AT THIS TIME} |
|
| 04/25/2013 | PDSD Engineering Division Pre-Construction SITE | Passed | {Activity date: 04/25/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - MET WITH SUPERINTENDENT: 1) CONSTRUCTION ON SITE IS LESS THAN 1 ACRE, THEREFORE NO STORM WATER PERMIT IS NEEDED. HOWEVER, DISTURBED SOIL MUST REMAIN ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 2) CALL FOR RE-INSPECTION FOR TRASH ENCLOSURE FOTTINGS 3) CALL FOR INSPECTION FOR ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO YOUR GRADING PLAN 4) CALL FOR INSPECTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL} |
|
| 09/11/2013 | PDSD Site/Engineering Division - Landscaping | Passed | {Activity date: 09/11/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - } | |
| 09/11/2013 | SITE - Stormwater Follow-up | Passed | {Activity date: 09/11/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - NO CONCERNS, SITE READY TO BE CLOSED AT THIS TIME.} ; {Activity date: 08/16/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - NO SIGNIFICANT STORM WATER CONCERNS AT THIS TIME} ; {Activity date: 07/25/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - NO SIGNIFICANT STORM WATER CONCERNS AT THIS TIME} ; {Activity date: 07/11/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - 1) A SWPPP HAS BEEN DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED. 2) AN NOI HAS BEEN POSTED ON SITE 3) SEDIEMNT CONTROLS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AND WILL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED 4) A CONCRETE/ MATERIALS WASH WILL BE USED ON SITE 5) ADD SEDIMENT CONTROLS AROUND THE EXISTING BATCH PLANT ON SITE 6) CALL FOR INSPECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE CHANNEL CROSSING AT EAST SIDE OF SITE} ; {Activity date: 07/10/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - 1) THE CONTRACTOR ON SITE NEEDS TO PROVIDE A SWPPP 2) CONTRACTOR HAS INSTALLED SEDIMENT CONTROLS 3) CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO POST A SIGNED COPY OF THE NOI AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE 4) CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO PERFORM AND DOCUMENT STORM WATER SELF INSPECTIONS 5) A CONCRETE/MATERIALS WASH MUST BE USED 6) MAY NEED TO ADD SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO EXISTING 7) CALL FOR INSPECTION PRIOR TO COVERING THE DRAINAGE INSTALL INTO THE MAIN CHANNEL} ; {Activity date: 06/27/2013; Status: Correction Required; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - 1) DISTURBED AREA OF SITE IS > 1AC, THEREFORE A STORM WATER PERMIT AND PLAN IS REQUIRED 2) GET AN NOI FROM ADEQ 3) POST A COPY OF THE NOI AT THE ENTRANCES OF THE SITE 4) DEVELOP A SWPPP FOR YOUR SITE 5) IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP, INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLS PER THE SWPPP AND CALL FOR INSPECTION 6) PROVIDE A CONCRETE/ MATERIALS WASH OUT ON SITE AND USE IT 7) PERFORM STORM WATER SELF INSPECTIONS EVERY 14 DAY AND/OR AFTER A SIGNIFICANT RAIN EVENT, AND DOCUMENT THEM 8) INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES/EXITS AS NEEDED 9) SWEEP UP TRACKED SOIL AS NEEDED 10) CLEAN OUT ALL EXISTING AND ANY NEW CATCH BASINS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL} ; {Activity date: 06/07/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - NO CHANGES AND OR CONCERNS AT THIS TIME} ; {Activity date: 04/25/2013; Status: Continued; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - SEDIMENT CONTROLS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. NO SIGNIFICANT STORM WATER CONCERNS AT THIS TIME} |
|
| 09/11/2013 | SITE - Stormwater Final Inspection | Passed | {Activity date: 09/11/2013; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - } | |
| 01/22/2014 | ENGR Engineering Final | Passed | {Activity date: 01/22/2014; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - } ; {Activity date: 09/11/2013; Status: Partial Approval; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - FINAL GERADING NOT TO BE GIVEN TILL THE APPROVED REVISED/AS-BUILT DRAWINGS, A CERTIFICATION LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS PROVIDED. THE CONTRACTOR HAS ADVISED ME THAT THERE ARE SOME MINOR CHANGES BEING MADE TO THE DOWN SPOUTS FOR THE BUILDINGS THAT WILL BE REFLECTED IN THE REVISIONS. i HAVE ASKED THAT HE CONSULT WITH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ON THE ROOF DRAINAGE THAT DEPOSITS DIRECTLY ONTO THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NEW RESTROOMS. PER OUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THERE SHOULD BE NO WATERS FROM WITHIN A TEN YEAR STORM THAT CAN BE DEPOSITED ONTO A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS WAY, IT MUST PASS UNDERNEATH IT.} | |
| 01/22/2014 | ENGR Grading Final | Passed | {Activity date: 01/22/2014; Status: Approved; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - } ; {Activity date: 09/11/2013; Status: Partial Approval; Inspector: DROBERTS; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - PROVIDE APPROVED DRAWINGS FOR MIKE TOO VERIFY ON 9/16/2013.} ; {Activity date: 07/11/2013; Status: Partial Approval; Inspector: MRUSSO; Comment: Entered by DROBERT5 - REVISION OF BUBBLER AND DRAINAGE INTO EXISTING CHANNEL, NO APPROVED PLANS YET} |