Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Case: T21DV07905
Case Details
Entered Date:
11/05/2021
Applicant:
ANTHONY FRANCIS & JULIE ANN DELORENZO JR FAMILY TR
Description:
Group dwelling in violation of UDC; refuse and garbage on property, in front yard (W6)
Completed Inspections
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Case Number: T21DV07905
Case Description: RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Total Completed Inspections - 2
End Date | Description | Inspector | Results | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
12/01/2021 | INSP - INITIAL CODE ENFORCMENT | VALDEZ | Approved | Research: the property has a 3 detached buildings, one garage, and two dwellings. Pima County description of the dwellings are one triplex and one 4 plex. Onsite inspection: There is no refuse on the grounds. I did meet with 3 students which stated there are 4 students which live in the front dwelling and 4 which live in the rear dwelling. There are two red tagged posted on the front window these tags are dated 8-19-2021 / 11/18/2021. The code states: sec 8. If there is one or more dwelling(s) on a lot, all dwellings on a lot are considered to be one dwelling for the purpose of determining whether there is a group dwelling. If there are five or more unrelated persons residing on the lot, it is a group dwelling that is not permitted. |
12/28/2021 | INSP - FOLLOW UP CODE ENFORCE | VALDEZ | Approved | WORKING WITH PDSD ON CASE |
Outstanding Case Activity Conditions
Date | Name | Approved |
12/01/2021 | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 4: ZONES 4.7. ZONES - PURPOSE 4.9.7. RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP B. Family Dwelling 8. If there is one or more dwelling(s) on a lot, all dwellings on a lot are considered to be one dwelling for the purpose of determining whether there is a group dwelling. If there are five or more unrelated persons residing on the lot, it is a group dwelling that is not permitted. 9. Subject to the requirements of this Section 4.9.7.B.9, any group dwelling use existing prior to February 15, 2012 shall be treated as a lawful nonconforming use and structure in accordance with Article 9, Nonconforming Uses, Buildings, and Structures, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Section and in Tucson Code Section 16-37. A protected development right plan approved by the Mayor and Council prior to the enactment of this ordinance shall be treated as a nonconforming use for a maximum number of unrelated persons equivalent to the number of bedrooms on the approved plan. a. The right to treatment as a nonconforming use or structure under this section is established by the following: (1) Evidence that the property was registered as a rental property as required by A.R.S. §33-1902 on or before February 15, 2012, or is otherwise timely registered as required by that statute; and (2) Evidence acceptable to the Zoning Administrator that establishes the maximum number of unrelated persons to whom the dwelling was leased pursuant to subsection (a) above. Such evidence may include executed leases, tax records, an approved protected development right plan as described in this section, or other documentation. An executed lease that was executed during the calendar year 2009, 2010, or 2011 shall be sufficient under this subsection to establish the number of persons to whom the dwelling was leased. b. If a group dwelling is established for treatment as a lawful nonconforming use as provided in subsection (1) above, the maximum number of unrelated persons to whom the dwelling may be leased shall be that number established by the evidence provided under subsection (1)(b) above. c. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.2.1.B, an established nonconforming use under this Section 4.9.7.B.9 shall not be deemed abandoned or lost based upon the leasing of the dwelling after February 15, 2012 to less than five unrelated persons, to related persons, or to a single family; or upon the failure to lease the dwelling, provided that it is continually registered as a rental property as described under A.R.S. §33-1902. d. The nonconforming use under this Section 4.9.7.B.9 may be suspended or lost as provided in Section 9.2.1.B if it is declared a public nuisance by court order pursuant to Tucson Code Section | Not Approved |
Completed Activity Special Conditions
Case Description - RESIDENTIAL ZONING
Case Number - T21DV07905
Case Status: COMPLIAN
Total Completed Case Activity Conditions: 1
Date | Name |
12/28/2021 | CONTACTED BY EMAIL |