Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T98CM02096
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning 3/14/2008 The LDO issued in 2001 was for a building height of 21'8". This revision indicates a building height of 25' therefore a new DDO (use to be called LDO) is needed because the setback will be greater for a 25' building height. The maximum height allowed is 25 feet. If building height exceeds 25 feet, a Board of Adjustment Variance is required. |
| 03/20/2008 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. WHAT SPECIFICALLY CHANGED ON DETAIL 10 ON SHEET 1.2? IT IS NOTED AS A SECOND CHANGE. 2. SHEET 6.1 ON THE FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: NEW HEADER H2 SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF THE CALCULATIONS (3-2X12) IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 3. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE HARD TO INTERPRET. SUBMIT A NEW SET OF DRAWINGS THAT INDICATES ALL OF THE 8/00 CHANGES WITHOUT CLOUDS, AND THE 2/08 CHANGES CLOUDED. INFORMATION IS CONFUSING AND MISSING. 4. SUBMIT TRUSS DRAWINGS AS PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL, INDICATING THE CHANGES TO THE HIGH ROOF TRUSSES AND THE ADDITION OF THE BALCONY. 5. SHEET 6.1, DETAIL SK2: NOTE TO RELOCATE WINDOW AS REQUIRED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. ARCHITECT MUST LOCATE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 6. CALCULATION SHEET 12 AND SHEET 6.1: FLOOR DECK THICKNESS AND INTERMEDIATE NAILING ARE NOT COORDINATED. 7. CALCULATION SHEET 13 AND SHEET 6.1 (DETAIL 6): TOP PLATE NAILING VARIES. 8. SHEAR WALLS AND HOLDOWNS IN CALCULATIONS LATERAL KEY PLAN NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH SHEET 6.1 FRAMING PLANS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2008 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/28/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |