Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM04502
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Quick Trip T22CM04501 – BUILDING T22CM04502 - FUEL CANOPY DP22-0003 4857 E Grant Rd – PAD-14 (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: September 16, 2022 This site is located in PAD-15 General Merchandise Sales is an allowed use in the PAD. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP22-0003 and although it appears that the building plans match the DP, Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the DP is approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/20/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM04501 T22CM04502 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Earlier Review Comments updated (9/18/2022) after review of the responses received: CANOPY REVIEW COMMENTS: C1. Provide a copy of the geotech engineer's report mentioned in the Structural Notes on the Structural drawings. - Geotech report provided, comment closed. C2. Provide a copy of the Structural Calculations so review for structural details as shown can be provided. Specifically provide: gravity load design calculations for the W18x50 beam on grid B spanning between grids 1 and 2; Column design located on grid B1 and B2; Foundations design for the heaviest loaded columns on grid B and the Lateral Design Load Calculations. - Geotech engineer specified specific sub-grade requirements to be followed which isn't mentioned in the construction drawings. For reference, following is the text from geotech report that needs to be included on the foundation details: Shallow spread footings bearing on a minimum of 1 foot of engineered fill plus 8 inches pre-compacted subgrade extending at least 2 feet beyond the footing edges. Item OPEN. C3. Provide a lap length schedule for the designed concrete strength and designed steel strength. - Item Closed. C4. The 2018 IBC requires Continuous Special Inspections for Concrete Placement, Soil works and for Deep Foundations, this seems to be in conflict with the schedule of Special Inspections listed on drawing XC110, please either amend the Special Inspection Schedule as listed or else justify the contradiction with engineering logic/ evaluation. - Item Closed. RETAIL STORE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: B1. Geotech report and Structural Calculations (for both gravity loads and lateral loads) are required in order to provide a complete Structural review. - Structural Calcs for the building not provided, Item OPEN. B2. Mechanical Loads located on the roof are not listed as design loads in Structural Notes. -not addressed, Item Open. B3. As RTU's connection to the roof framing and Mechanical Screen connection to the roof framing is an integral part of this building permit, please provide their structural analysis and design for review. - Item closed. B4. Where is the detail for the lateral end bracing between end walls and the steel joists 28LH08, shown but not detailed on the roof framing plan. - Detail D11/S502 shown on drawing S130 is supposed to depict the lateral bracing/ bridging detail between the end wall and the roof joists parallel to the wall, what is shown in D11/S-502 is a detail for the roof joist perpendicular to the wall, not addressed, Item Open. B5. Seems like a lap length schedule for masonry reinforcement is provided but lap length schedule for footing rebar could not be located. - -not addressed, Item Open. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Third Plumbing Review: 1 thru 3 OK 4). SAME- Handsink #612 still shown indirect on plan page P 201 detail.....IPC 301.3, 802.1, 5). SAME- Plan Page A212 dual lav needs 15" minimum from sidewall to faucet center. -IPC 405.3.1 6 thru 7 OK 8). SAME- Add piping material specs for sanitary, storm & above ground water to plan page P600 or provide spec manual - IPC 303, 605, 702 ** SPEC MANUAL NOT SENT** 9). OK If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |