Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM03435
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM03435 Work Shop 4455 S HEATHER PL Zoning R-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5,2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1.COMMENT: After comparing the aerials to the plot plan it has come to my attention that there is a possible non-permitted porch addition on the North portion of the house. After researching PRO there were no records for the porch addition that could be verified or found. Provide permit documentation or include the information on this permits. 2.COMMENT: Show everything on site it appears that there is a shed on the Northwest portion of the property next to the porch. Please clarify if that is a shed if so include the height, square footage and setback dimension. 3.COMMENT: Provide the gross floor area of the House on the plan do not include the patio area. Per UDC Article 6.6.3.d the accessory structure proposed shed cannot exceed 50% of the gfa of the principal structure. 4.COMMENT: Revise scale on-site plan. Revise the lot coverage calculation to not include the patio as it does not count toward the lot coverage calculation per UDC 6.4.3.C.1.a. 5.COMMENT: The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 10’-8” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed to the east property line is 7’-1 ”, proposed setback is 6’-0”. At a minimum a neighbor’s setback waiver is required to reduce the perimeter yard setback. To secure this waiver the following text shall be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the only of the property to the east: My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you are unable to secure the neighbor’s setback waiver a Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved to reduce the setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/05/2022 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/05/2022 | PCAMARE1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/26/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Completed | Activity Number: T22CM03435 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. All new windows shall have a U factor of .40 or less, and a SHGC of .25. Skylights shall have a U factor of .65 or less. 2018 IECC Table R402.1.2. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved 1. Provide a clear working space in front of the new electrical sub panel that is 30” wide and 36” deep. It appears that there may be a counter or other obstruction indicated. This will be verified in the field at inspection. 2017 NEC 110.25 (A) (1). PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Coditionally Approved No plumbing work has been included with this submittal If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |