Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM01459
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/12/2022 | KROBLES1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | PLEASE CONTACT PC ADDRESSING BUILDING NUMBER NEEDS TO BE ASSIGNED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE PH# 520-724-9512 ADDRESSING@PIMA.GOV |
| 08/16/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/22/2022 | DBENOIT1 | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM01449, : T22CM01450, : T22CM01451, : T22CM01452, : T22CM01453, T22CM01454, : T22CM01455,: T22CM01459, : T22CM01477, : T22CM01478, : T22CM01479 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Correct the occupant loads on the apartment buildings on the G Sheets. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 4. Provide exhaust air to kitchens in all apartment units sheet M401 (IMC2018,403.3). on your plans you have the exhaust fan directly above the range hood with a ceiling radiation damper, not good the exhaust inlet for the kitchen shall not be directly above the range like you got it in sheets M401 and M402. it will prematurely activate the radiation damper please correct. Not Complied There is no ceiling radiation damper available, that is tested and listed for kitchen exhaust applications, Not Complied 5. Provide fire dampers and not radiation dampers for the main supply ducts as radiation dampers are not rated for this velocity sheet M401(IMC2018,304.1) you still got a ceiling radiation damper at the air handler plenum not a fire damper, so provide model type on the ceiling radiation damper weather it is static or dynamic. it needs to be dynamic with the proper velocity range Not Complied Your revised plans on sheet M401 and M402 still show the radiation dampers Not Complied 6. Dryer exhaust duct and bathroom exhaust penetrations of fire rated ceiling membrane penetration shall be protected in an approved manner in all apartment units sheet M401 (2018,607.6.2). You need to wrap the dryer duct in a 1 hour dryer duct shaft which is available on the market. you did not address this correction Not Complied Exception 714.4.1.2 of the IBC is a firestop system, based on ul 1479 (astmE814) with double top plates required, and this is a floor penetration not a wall penetration where a F and T rating are required which would be a 1 hour and the rating for that firestop system is only got a 3/4 hour rating which does not meet the floor rating requirement which you neither have. Not Complied ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied The following were not corrected in the 3rd update. Response comments imply that these are corrected in their Addendum #4. Will need to see these updates before issuing approval. E102C BLDG C 2ND & 3RD FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN: Latest submittal still needs to replace/update drawing as currently missing information and title block/border is messed up. E111 CLUBHOUSE ELECTRICAL PLAN: Need to provide short circuit calculation for Riser diagram detail #2 (At CT cabinet, and two panels shown). Identify the two panels on the Riser diagram. E301 ELECTRICAL DETAILS: Need to provide short circuit calculations for Main distribution meter centers and some typical panels. Need to provide KAIC ratings for Main distribution meter center. Acceptable to use Series ratings if all equipment is from same manufacturer. E302 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES: Panelboard HP1 missing KAIC rating. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Third Plumbing Review: Comments #1, 11, 18, 18B, & 23 still not satisfied 1). SAME- ** secondary scupper detail is shown, but also need typical secondary roof drain detail for the following areas: #1,6,9-ME101A, #3,8-ME101B, #3-ME101C, #3,8,11,16-ME101D, #1,2,3,4-ME110**( No response about these specific areas, do these areas have parapets? OR if there is a roof drain blockage is storm water build up able to spill over edge? 2), OK 3 THRU 10 OK 11). SAME- DFU loads on plan page M101B & M101D exceed the associated 3 & 4 inch sanitary BLDG drains. -IPC 710 12 THRU 17 ok 18).SAME- BBQ grills below trellis on landscape page 18 need an exhaust hood above. -IFGC 623.5 "CJD ENGINEERING RESPONSE: Omit trellis above these BBQ. No overhead construction will be provided" **Provide plan page where change is reflected** 18(B) SAME- BBQ grill manual also require Grill enclosure to have ventilation-IFGC 305.1 **NO Response** 19)OK 20). OK- note 85 on SU100 pool equipment capped for future for separate permit 21). OK- Field Verify Underground CSST per install instructions 22). OK 23). SAME -Plan page SU100 Note P104 states pipe to "FIRE PIT" when piping is followed to note P79 that correlates to a BBQ - CLARIFY ON PLANS IFGC 106.3.1 24) OK 25). OK- SUBJECT TO FIELD VERIFY FIRE PIT GAS FEATURE INSTALL REQUIREMENTS & REQUIRE ENCLOSURE VENTING PER INSTALL INSTUCTIONS If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/29/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/29/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 08/29/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM01449, T22CM01450, T22CM01451, T22CM01452, T22CM01453, T22CM01454, T22CM01455, T22CM01459, T22CM01477, T22CM01478, T22CM01479, Plot Plan Review (2nd Review) Address: 4570 S Landing Wy TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 29, 2022 Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated Development Package. While the building plans are consistent with the associated DP as it relates to the zoning review purview of the Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc., zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP has been approved by all review agencies. 2. Zoning acknowledges the “UNIT MIX” table added to the plan. As impact fees will be assessed on each building permit can you provide a breakdown based on each building? COMMENT: For the purpose of determining impact fees for this project provide a breakdown of each building type and the number of each type unit within that building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp. |