Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Plan Number - T21PRE0049
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/01/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | 8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements 1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section. 2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall: a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and, b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas. 3. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual. 4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section. 5. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD. 6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials: a. Tile; b. Stone; c. Brick; d. Adobe; e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or, f. Metal. |
03/08/2021 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | Standard requirments will apply |
03/08/2021 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | None |
03/10/2021 | NMARTEL1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Nicholas Martell, Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T21PRE0049 Address: 831 E Limberlost Drive; Parcel(s): 105102560, 2570, 2580, 2590, 2600, 2610, 2620, 2640, 2650, 2660, 2670 Zoning: MH-1 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Single Family Dwellings (FLD) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 04, 2021 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. The proposal is for 11 single-family residences developed as a Flexible Lot Development (FLD). MH-1 zoning permits the maximum density FLD. Except as provided, all applicable standards of the UDC apply. 3. Site coverage for a maximum density FLD in the MH-1 zone is 70%. Site coverage is used for the FLD process, as opposed to lot coverage. Ensure the vehicular use area is included in the calculation. 4. Along interior street lot lines street perimeter yards are required, in accordance with Section 6.4.5.C UDC. The street setback may be administratively reduced by the PDSD director based on a finding that the reduced setback enhances the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD (8.3.7.K) 6. With a lot 5 acres or fewer, and fewer than 13 dwelling units per acre, contiguous functional open space is required at 109 sq. ft. per unit. (8.7.3). 7. Ensure access standards found in section 7.8 of the UDC and sections 7-01.0.0 and 10-01.0.0 of the Technical Standards Manual are met. 8. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov |
03/11/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | 1. Engineering design looks sound and DP15-0161 was approved back in 2015, any proposed changes to the design with the new submittal will need to be reviewed to current engineering standards. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
03/16/2021 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Needs Review |