Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T21CM06494
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/16/2021 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM06494 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide accurate information regarding Current Codes per International Building Code 2018. The Enercalc calculations submitted references IBC 2015 and ASCE7-10. Resubmit revised calculations referencing 2018 IBC. 2. Provide Geotechnical Report for the proposed building per International Building Code 2018, Section 1803.1. 3. Structural steel, components and fasteners that are exposed to weather are to be protected against corrosion in accordance with AISC 360 Section B.13 as indicated in IBC 2018 Section 2203.1. 4. Designer is to coordinate venting and drainage hole requirements for HSS tube members that are galvanized using the hot-dip galvanizing process. Provide for plugs as needed. AWS D-19.0 calls for welds on galvanized steel to be free of zinc. Field welds on galvanized parts requires the removal of the zinc coating in the area of weld. Provide zinc paint (approved by the galvanizer) and apply as required to the weld and steel area to provide protection. 5. Provide galvanized bolts on the framing connections which are exposed to weather. 6. Unprotected foundations are to have frost protection as required in IBC 2018 Section 1809.5. Foundations are to be located below the frost line or use alternate methods as provided. 7. Verify the design lateral pressure from the surcharge loads are included in the lateral earth pressure load and design of the foundation wall as indicated in IBC 2018 Section 1610.1 8. Non-load bearing walls require a deflection track or details to allow for the relative lateral deflection of the structural members. 9. Structural general notes are to include any components of the building that may be considered deferred submittals. IBC Section 107.3.4.1 requires deferred submittals to be approved by the building official. Examples of items that likely should not be deferred include deep foundation elements, deep excavation shoring and prefabricated metal buildings. If items will be deferred the plans are to clearly note the following per IBC Section 107.3.4.1: * To be reviewed by design professional in responsible charge. * Design professional shall affix a notation that the deferred items are in general conformance with their design of the building. * They shall be submitted for review by the building official. * Shall not be installed until approved by building official. 10. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approval Pending 1. The occupant load factor is incorrect. While in this particular project the changed occupant load will not create any changes, it is important to have the correct occupant load on the drawings and the certificate of occupancy. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied EP101 FIRST FLOOR POWER PLAN: Few Site Plan Keynotes actually used. E501 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAMS & PANEL SCHEDULES: NEC code issue: Grounding electrode conductors are undersized on the One-Line Diagram. E503 ELECTRICAL DETAILS: Should rephase cooling requirements voltage from 240vac to 208vac for MDP2. Current design T1 provides only 208 volt. Most 240 vac systems should work, but changing requirement to 208V 3ph will assure that it will work. EQ106 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT DETAILS: Several of the conduits into MCP1 do not correlate with underground conduit legend on Sheet EQ105. Comment also applies to BP1. BP2 is missing 3 conduit feeds per sheet EQ105. IT cabinet seems to be missing some conduits too. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1). The sand/oil interceptor tank needs to be vented. - IPC 1003.9 update pages P100, P301 2). The trapped drains & the Bldg drain that discharge to the sand/oil drainage system need to be vented. -IPC 901.2.1, 904.1 update plan page P301 3). indirect drains over 54" total developed length need to be trapped. -IPC 802.3 update plan page P101, P301 4). Label Trapped item on P301 downstream of mop sink, appears to be floor drain. -IPC A106.3.1 709.1 5). This is in reference to the vent for the trapped item that appears to be floor drain downstream of the mopsink on P301, this vent can't horizontally offset until the vent is 6" above the drain being vented. -IPC 905.4 6). Plumbing Plan pages need to notate the type of piping materials to be used for all systems. -IPC A106.3.1 7). Plan page P201 shows a EWH-4 to be used, an EWH-4 is not listed on page P001? plan pages need to correlate. -IPC A106.3.1 8). Towers A/B on P304 & A121 need to include primary & secondary roof drain, conductor, & scupper sizes with calculations that derive from -IPC 1106.2, 1106.5, 1108.1, 1108.3 9). Plans need to include gutter & gutter downspout sizing with calculations. -IPC 1106.6, 1106.3 update pages G3.0 & P304 10). Plans do not indicate a secondary drain system for the canopy on P304? -IPC section 1108 |
| 08/25/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The building shall be within 400 feet of a hydrant. Please show existing hydrants and the distance to the furthest part of the building as the hose lays not as the crow flies. The building is 4,553 therfore a letter shall be provided from Tucson Water showing that the hydrant near the facility can provide 1,750 gpm. If the GPM for 2 hours cannot be achieved you shall sprinkler the building. Questions: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 08/25/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | All hydrant located on the opposite side of major streets. Owner shall provide a hydrant on this new build. Questions: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 08/31/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf 2. Show the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe on a site plan. The development package is not a substitute for a complete site plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018. |
| 08/31/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM06494 4702 E 22nd St New Car Wash TRANSMITTAL: August 31, 2021 This site is located in the C-2zone (UDC 4.7.21). 1. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with DP21-0201 and although it appears that the plan match unit DP21-0201 has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/31/2021 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 09/15/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2021 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |