Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T20PRE0057
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
1001 N PARK AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PRESUBM MTG

Plan Number - T20PRE0057
Review Name: PRESUBM MTG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/30/2020 ELISA HAMBLIN ZONING REVIEW Completed CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal
PDSD Zoning Review

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner

PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting – T20PRE0057
Address: 1001 N Park Av
Parcel(s): 11504495A
Zoning: C-1 (MGD)
Existing Use: Financial Services
Proposed Use: Group Dwelling

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 30, 2020

COMMENTS:
1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package.
2. It is acknowledged this project will be opting into the Main Gate District Overlay. Development and design standards from the MGD will apply.
3. Please be aware, a full development package with the first round review complete is required prior to formal submittal of the MGD application.
4. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards.

If you have any questions please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.
04/30/2020 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Completed Transportation and Mobility offers the following comments/requirements.

A traffic impact analysis will be required to include vehicular, transit, bike and pedestrian considerations.

Zelin Canchola
04/30/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Completed Follow the previous HUB submittals. No required on-site landscaping is necessary.
04/30/2020 SBEASLE1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Completed Rick Gonzalez, Architect
214 E Suffolk Drive, Tucson, Az. 85704
(520) 850-7401 gonzalezrick34@gmail.com
DATE: April 30, 2020
TO: Maria Gayosso, Urban Planner/Principal Planner/Project Manager, City of Tucson
FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992)
COT On-Call Design Professional
RE: IID Initial Comments, Pre-Submittal T20PRE0057, The Hub 5
I have reviewed the Main Gate District Pre-Submittal Package for The Hub 5 submitted April 2020 for the purpose of determining its conformance with the Submittal Requirements of the IID. I have checked the submittal against the PreSubmittal Requirements in the UDC Article 5.12.
Submittal Requirements Status
1. Identify proposal and why review is required. land split, minor subdivision, major subdivision, compliance with HDZ, change of existing development plan, new development plan, condition of annexation or rezoning)
Refer to Comment 1 Below (Required by MGD)
2. Identify any existing case numbers associated with the property. (Rezoning, Subdivisions, Board of Adjustment, etc.)
Complete
3. Provide supporting documentation, rezoning conditions, etc. Provide a copy of existing approved Site Plan, Development Plan/Package or Tentative Plat for re-subdivisions.
Complete (on PRO)
4. If new plan, place a north arrow on it with correct scale.
Complete (on PRO)
5. Provide the address, parcel number, location of the property or a map to identify the subject lot. (A copy of the Plat Map from the Pima County Assessor’s Office will help.)
Complete
6. Identify the last approved use for the property and the proposed use(s).
Complete
7. Show existing/proposed property lines, lots, dimensions, and total square footage of each.
Complete (on PRO)
8. If no plan is on file, new plan should show the existing building(s), proposed expansion(s) if applicable, gross floor area, and distance to all property lines for each structure.
Refer to Comment 2 Below (Required by MGD)
9. Identify the height of each new structure and/or expansion.
10. If your project is a bar, social organization, worship use, civic use, or restaurant, provide a fully dimensioned floor plan, identifying the use of each area or room.
Refer to Comment 3 Below (Required by MGD)
11. Identify the existing zoning on the property, and adjacent zoning in all directions.
Refer to Comment 4 Below (Required by MGD)
12. Provide height of outside walls closest to property lines of all existing/proposed buildings.
Refer to Comment 5 Below (Required by MGD)
13. Show existing & proposed, dimensioned: parking spaces, driveways, site entrance/exit points.
Complete
14. Show refuse collection provisions with adequate ingress/egress.
Complete
15. Identify pavement, curb, and sidewalk locations for all property frontages in the public Right Of Way (ROW).
Complete
16. Show existing/proposed landscaping, fences, walls, and current/future ROW.
Refer to Comment 6 Below (Required by MGD)
17. Indicate Federal Emergency Management Area (FEMA) or city Flood Hazard designated areas.
Please Provide
18. Show proposed location of new sewer lines and connections to main.
Complete

General Comments
1. Identify proposal as – New Development Plan
2. Show distance to all property lines for each structure. Presub. Indicates 2' or less.
3. MGD requires commercial development on 1st Floor Level. I see the plans call out for “Amenities”.
Is there any more specific information on proposed commercial uses?
4. Please identify adjacent zoning on the west, east and south of the property zoning.
5. Is the 20'-8” setback height consistent on three sides of the building?
6. Please provide the concept for the new landscaping around the proposed building.

Based on an initial and cursory review of the proposed project, I see some items
for further study, review, and comment. (More detailed comments will be
provided at formal review).
1. Further define the relationship of the existing building to the north in regard to the existing and
proposed setbacks. Define how the area is accessed, what landscape remains or is altered, etc.
2. Please identify refuse collection provisions.

Sincerely,
Rick Gonzalez, Architect
RGA
04/30/2020 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Completed T20PRE0057 - 1001 N Park Av
1. Show how pool and landscape water overflows will be managed without off-site discharge.
2. Site is neither balanced or critical. Area has existing drainage issues. Demonstrate no adverse impact and show improvements to the existing situation.
3. Show how water harvesting will be maximized.
4. Ensure overhead space for solid waste service.
05/01/2020 EHAMBLI1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Completed
05/01/2020 EHAMBLI1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Completed 200 - 230 pm - T20PRE0057 - 1001 N PARK AV - SiteMain Gate District Hub V at Park & First

· The Site Plan shows a new fire service line being connected to the existing 12” ductile iron water main in Park Avenue, and the 1st Floor Site Plan shows water meters on the south side of the building, and this project intends to obtain its potable water from the existing 8” ductile iron water main in 1st Street. The minimum static water pressure in these water mains is approximately 67 psi, and an on-site private water booster station may be necessary to provide adequate water pressure to the upper floors of this proposed 10 story building.

· After a water fixture unit count has been conducted for the project using the 2018 International Plumbing Code, and the fire flow requirements have been established by the local fire authority, please contact Ray Munoz at 837-2207 in the Tucson Water New Services Section to discuss:

o The number of water and fire service lines, their points of connection to Tucson Water’s existing water distribution system, the number of water meters, and the meter sizes, necessary to serve this proposed development.

o The advantages and disadvantages of installing the necessary water service lines and water meters via Tucson Water’s Job Order Contract (JOC) process.

· Please note that hydraulic modeling may need to be performed to verify this 8” existing water main has the hydraulic capacity necessary to serve the proposed development. If this is necessary, it can be arranged by Mr. Munoz.

· Also please note that should a 3” water meter be necessary to serve this proposed development, it will need to be installed in a 10’ x 25’ large meter enclosure constructed per Tucson Water Standard Detail 314 at ground level.

· The overhangs shown on the south side of the building shown in the Site Plan (and other drawings) must not be located over the new large water service line to the building.