Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T20CM01374
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2020 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T20CM01374 - New Building (Multi-Family Development) Building Plan Review (1st Review) Flash South 902 S. 6th Avenue - C-3 Zoning (Related to DP17-0249) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 19, 2020 DUE DATE: March 27, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the Current version of the unapproved development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the unapproved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plans to ensure consistency with the DP. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 03/24/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/25/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The residential provisions of the 2018 International Energy Compliance Code are the controlling energy code requirement for this project. Reference: Section R101.5, IECC 2018. (see Sheet A0.3, "Chapter 13".) 2. Provide calculations (e.g. REScheck or COMcheck) to show that the building thermal envelope complies with the requirements R401.2, IECC 2018. 3. Provide mechanical ventilation for FC-C in the first floor corridor. Reference: Section R403.6, IECC 2018. 4. All of the apartments require mechanical ventilation, not natural ventilation as noted on sheet A3.7. Reference: Section R403.6, IECC 2018. 5. Verify the exhaust flowrate of the range exhaust. Reference: Section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2018. 6. The exhaust length table in detail 113 (Dryer Vent Termination) does not apply unless you are using the specific GE dryer for which the maximum length table was created. While the architectural floor plans show separate washers and dryers, the plumbing plans are based on an "owner specified" stacked washer/dryer so without a specific model of dryer, the duct length criteria must comply with Section 504.8.4.1, IMC 2018. Verify that the dryer duct lengths comply with the code requirements. (Note that the detail also refers to the 2012 IMC) |
| 03/25/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Provide a site plan showing the route, slope and cleanout locations of the building sewer to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018 3. Complete plumbing roof plan on sheet P-2 (e.g. x,xxx for the roof areas and x for the roof drain and pipe sizes sizes) Reference Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 4. Coordinate the route of the 2" FM from the elevator sump pump. Keynote 3 on sheet P-1 calls for the pipe to run in the 1st level ceiling space but detail 201 shows the pipe running underground. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 5. The condensate drain from the fan coils serving the corridors is shown terminating in a washer box of an adjacent apartment (e.g. Keynote 5, P-1). 6. Provide roof drainage calculations and design. Reference: Section 1106.1 and 1108.1, IPC 2018. |
| 03/26/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The DP must be approved first. 2. Clearly demonstrate primary roof drains will not be directed over sidewalks. |
| 03/29/2020 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 03/31/2020 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2020 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet A0.2; Chapter 4 (420.5): The required smoke alarms reference Sections 907.2.6, 907.2.8, 907.2.9, and 907.2.11. Please revise 907.2.11 to 907.2.10. 2. Sheet A0.2; Chapter 5 (Table 504.3): The drawing indicates a maximum height of 40'. Table 504.3 indicates 60' for an R occupancy classification with an S13R sprinkler system. Please verify. 3. Sheet A0.2; Chapter 7 (Section 708.3 Exception 2): The exception allows 1/2 hour separation between dwelling units if the building is equipped with NFPA13 sprinklers per Section 903.3.1.1. Since the sprinkler system is NFPA13R per Section 903.3.1.2, Exception 2 may not be used. Do you want to remove the Exception 2 verbiage? Please verify. 4. Sheet A0.2; Chapter 7 (Section 711.2.4.3 Exception): The exception allows 1/2 hour for a horizontal assembly separating sleeping units if the building is equipped with NFPA13 sprinklers per Section 903.3.1.1. Since the sprinkler system is NFPA13R per Section 903.3.1.2,, the Exception may not be used. Do you want to remove the Exception verbiage? Please verify. 5. Sheet A0.2; Chapter 10 (Section 1010): Section 1008.1.1 is referenced in this section. Please revise that Section reference. 6. Sheet A0.2; Chapter 10 (Section 1011.2): The stair riser and tread dimensions should reference Section 1011.5.2. Please verify. 7. Sheet A0.3; Chapter 11 (Section 1107.6.2): In this section, please indicate that Type A Units shall meet all requirements of the ICC/ANSI Section 1003, and Type B Units shall meet all requirements of the ICC/ANSI Section 1004. List those requirements on the drawings as required. 8. Sheet A2.3; Building Section 8: The Unit on the east end of the section should be Unit A2 at the first floor. Please verify. 9. Sheet A4.1; Elevation D: Please indicate the backing on the side wall of the water closet for the vertical grab bar as shown in the ICC/ANSI Figure 604.5.1. 10. Sheet S1.0; General Structural Notes (Foundations): Note 1 indicates the foundation design was based on a soils report. Please provide a copy of that report. 11. Sheet S2.0 (Foundation Plan); Sheet S4.0 (Detail 108): The interior corridor walls indicate W2 only on the Foundation Plan, while Detail 108 indicates a shear wall footing in the title. Please revise the detail title. 12. Sheet S3.1 (Roof Framing Plan); Sheet S5.0 (Detail 206): Note 8 on the north and south exterior walls on the Roof Framing Plan indicates a shaded area (not shown) and references Detail 206. Detail 206 does not indicate a dimension for the over framing. Please verify and add a dimension or a reference. 13. Sheet S3.1 (Roof Framing Plan); Sheet S5.0 (Detail 208): The Framing Plan indicates 2x12 joists at 24" o.c. over the corridor, while Detail 208 indicates 2x8 joists. Please coordinate. 14. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed. This certificate may be found at the City of Tucson website (www.tucsonaz.gov/PDSD). 15. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 04/02/2020 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. 1. The printing is not legible on some of the electrical plans. 2. The washer outlets in the units also require GFI protection. NEC 210.8A(10). 3. Ref; Plan Sheet E-6.0. Show the location of the Panelboard in the A1 unit. 4. Plan Sheet E-8.0 has no registrant seal. 5. Plan Sheet E-8.0 line diagram. The overcurrent protection for the feeder conductors for panel 'OWS' is rated to high for the ampacity rating of the 350 MCM AL conductors. Should be 250 amps not 300. NEC 240.4. 6. Due to bad printing or missing information on the plans, additional review comments may be generated at the subsequent review. Ref; 2018 IBC sec, 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, 2018 IECC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. |
| 04/24/2020 | ARUIZ1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2020 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |