Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM07845
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Maximum allowable quantities for flammable liquids appear to be exceeded. Must add together acetone and isopropyl alcohol. Max allowed is 240 gallons (with fire protection). Alcohol and acetone together equal 330 gallons. Please resolve. |
| 10/16/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet G-002; Waste Description: Please verify on this sheet the materials listed meet the maximum allowable quantities and storage requirements of the IBC Tables 307.1(1), 307.1(2), 414.2.5(1), and 414.2.5(2). 2. Sheet AR-101; Floor Plan: There is no partition type indicated on the east wall of Room 107, the east wall of Room 108, the south and west walls of Room 106, and the south wall of Room 105. Please verify. 3. Sheet AR-501; Detail 11: Please indicate the spacing of the metal stud braces, and include the size and quantity of the connectors at the top of the partition and at the roof structure. 4. Sheet AR-501; Detail 12: Please indicate the connection of the metal stud braces to the roof structure, the vertical studs, and the masonry wall. Include connector size and quantity, along with additional details as required. 5. Sheet SB-001; Soils and Earthwork: Note A references a soils report. Please provide one copy of that report for review. 6. Sheet SF-103 (Roof Framing Plan); Structural Calculations (Sheet 32): Keynote 8 on the roof framing plan indicates a 4x4x1/4 continuous ledger angle, while the calculation indicates a 4x4x3/8 angle. Please coordinate. 7. Sheet SF-501 (Detail 2); Structural Calculations (Sheet 32): Keynote 10 indicates a Type I embed plate (see 3/SJ-502), which designates (2) 5/8" diameter x 0'-4" HAS (Keynote 43). The calculations indicate a 3/4" diameter anchor. Please verify. 8. General: Please provide the Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed. You can find this form at www.tucsonaz.gov/PDSD. 9. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. Reviewed by Eric Newcomb Contact at 520-837-4911 or Eric.Newcomb@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/17/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 10/22/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012. 2. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. |
| 10/22/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/23/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012). The mechanical and electrical COMcheck analyses specify using reduced interior lighting to satisfy the requirement but the envelope COMcheck analysis calls for high efficiency HVAC. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide fire separation for the storage room (H-3 occupancy) and the remainder of the building. Reference: Sections 607.5.3, and 607.6.1, IMC 2012. |
| 10/30/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref; 2012 Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). Provide a site plan showing the locations and identification of all exterior luminaires including existing for this parcel. Luminaire identification marks must correlate with the luminaire schedule and lumen calcs. Also provide luminaire cut sheets to allow for verification of shielding and color temperature output. OLC section 104.2. #2. Ref; Plan Sheet EL 101. The note under lumen calcs stating "FIXTURES SHIELDED FROM ABOVE BY BUILDING STRUCTURE SHALL NOT BE COUNTED PER SECTION 27.5(E)(c)(i)", is incorrect. What is section "27.5(E)(c)(i) ? Could not locate this section in the OLC. Also per section 104.2.1(4), the building structure cannot qualify the luminaire as full cut-off. The luminaire must be considered full cut-off by the manufacturers design. #3. Ref; EP 101, EP 701. The equipment layout (Transformer 'T 10') shown on EP 101, does not correlate with the Line Diagram shown on EP 701. Please clarify. Ref; 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 11/01/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM07845 - New Building (Industrial - Test Equipment Facility) Building Plan Review (1st Review) Sion Power 2900 E. Elvira Road - I-1 Zoning (related to DP18-0132) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2018 DUE DATE: November 2, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved development package issued on October 4, 2018. While the building footprint and the site revisions are consistent with the approved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the 3rd Party or PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 5. Remove the PDSD stamp on sheet CG.101 or include the approved and PDSD signed DP copy of the sheet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building plans |
| 11/01/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/28/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |