Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T18CM06259
Parcel: 140200220

Address:
841 E BANTAM RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T18CM06259
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/29/2018 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/05/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheets T1 and A.1; Area Calculations: The total area indicates 6533 SF. This comes from a remodel area of 5226 SF, an addition of 875 SF (restroom and break room), and a covered patio of 432 SF. Please indicate on the drawings how the 5226 SF of remodel area was derived from the floor plan.
2. Sheets T1 and A.1; Area Calculations: It does not appear the new storage/baptismal area (525 SF) was added to the total square footage indicated. Please verify.
3. Sheet T1; Code Review (Type of Construction): The walls indicate one hour fire protection is required. Please indicate the code section on this sheet for that requirement.
4. Sheet T1; Code Review (Actual Area): Please verify the actual area per comments 1 and 2. Revise as required.
5. Sheet T1; Code Review (Allowable Area): The allowable area indicates 16,000 SF with no area increases. Per the IBC Table 503, the allowable area for an A-3 occupancy type with VB construction is 6000 SF. Per Section 506.3, an area increase is allowed when the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Please indicate on this sheet the allowable increase and the total allowable area.
6. Sheet T1; Code Review (Allowable Height and Stories): Per the IBC Section 504.2, the building height and stories may be increased where the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Please indicate on this sheet the allowable building height and number of stories.
7. Sheet T1; Code Review (Occupant Loads): It appears the occupant loads (as indicated on the floor plan on Sheet A.1) take into account only the existing assembly and education areas. Are the new areas adding any occupant load? Please verify.
8. Sheet A.1; Floor Plan: Please provide a door schedule for all new doors as indicated on the floor plan.
9. Sheet A.1; Wall Legend: Please indicate the metal stud gauges for the wall studs.
10. Sheet A.1; Floor Plan: Please add a reference note on this sheet to see Sheet E.3.3 for exit lighting.
11. Sheet A.1; Floor Plan: Per the IBC Section 1109.3, the sink in the break room must be accessible. Please indicate on the plan the counter/sink area must be 34" maximum above finish floor.
12. Sheet A.1; Floor Plan: One of the urinals in the new men's restroom must be accessible. The urinal partition must have a 30" minimum clearance at the urinal, and have a clear floor space of 30" x 48" per the ICC/ANSI Figure 305.3.
13. Sheet A.1 (Wall Legend); Sheet S.1 (General Structural Notes): The structural sheet indicates wood wall studs while the architectural sheet indicates metal wall studs. Please coordinate.
14. Sheet A.2; North Elevation: The north elevation indicates the window on the left in a different location than the floor plan indicates, and the door into the existing restroom is not shown on the elevation. Please revise.
15. Sheet S.1; General Structural Notes (Carpentry): Please add a note indicating the typical wall stud size and spacing.
16. Sheet S.1 (Foiundation Plan); Structural Calculations: Please provide structural calculations for all new footings.
17. Sheet S.1; General Structural Notes (Carpentry): Please add a note on this sheet to indicate the deferred submittal for the wood roof trusses must follow the requirements of the IBC Section 107.3.4.1.
18. Sheet S.1; General (Foundation and Earthwork): Note 1 indicates footing depths are shown on the construction drawiwngs. Please add those depths to the plan.
19. Sheet S.1; General (Foundation and Earthwork): Please add a note that the bottom of the new footings must be located a minimum of 16" below finish grade or finish floor.
20. Sheet S.1; Typical Anchor Detail: Please indicate the typical anchor size and minimum embedment length on this detail. Indicate where these anchors will be used.
21. Sheet S.1; Foundation Plan: Please provide details on the drawings for new footings at new walls, new footings at new columns, and new footings that intersect with existing footings.
22. Sheet S.2; Framing Plan: Please provide details on the drawings for new roof joists at new walls, new roof joists at existing walls, new roof trusses at existing walls, new roof trusses at new beams, and new roof joists/trusses parallel to existing and new walls.
23. General: Please provide a site plan for this project.
24. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. For questions, contact Eric Newcomb at
520-837-4911.
09/05/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
09/13/2018 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
09/13/2018 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Reference: Section C403.2.1, IMC 2012
2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the mechanical systems the building envelope based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Provide structural calculations to verify that the roof-mounted equipment will be safely supported by the roof structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
4. Provide service space for roof mounted equipment (roof slope 4:12). Reference: Section 306.5.1 IMC 2012
5. Provide the specifications range and the residential-style hood located in the breakroom. Provide justification for the installation of a residential-style hood. Reference: Sections 507.2.1 and 507.2.3, IMC 2012.
6. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct (see HP-5). Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012.
09/14/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. How is the baptizing tub filled and drained? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012
2. Provide a lavatory in the existing restroom with the exterior entrance. Reference: section 405.3.2, IPC 2012.
3. Provide the spout height for each drinking fountain. Reference: Section410.2, IPC 2012 and Section 602.4, ICC A117.1-2009.
4. Verify that water heater WH-3 is listed for outside use. Reference: Sections 501.5 and 502.1, IPC 2012.
5. Clarify the configuration of the waste piping and cleanout for P-8 as shown in detail B/P2.0. Why is a 3" cleanout used for a 2" drain? Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012
6. The rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (2514.66) is more than 12" above the first floor elevation (2516). Plumbing fixtures located on a floor level more than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole shall not discharge through a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012.
7. Provide roof drainage and overflow drainage for the addition and for other roofs with new parapets. Reference: Sections 1101,1106, and 1108, IPC 2012.
09/18/2018 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Ref; Plan Sheet E3.1.
(a) There is a PI mark indicated on the circuit run but no pole light indicated. Please clarify.
(b) The branch circuit indicated for the pole lights and the monument sign do not correlate with the panel schedule for panel A.
#2. Ref; Plan Sheet E3.2.
(a) The pole light count for 'P1' in the lumen calcs does not correlate with the amount shown on the site plan.
(b) Verify Lamp Color Temperature for exterior lighting does not exceed 3500K, per section 402.1. Outdoor Lighting Code.
#3. Provide complete compliance with the 2012 IECC for lighting.
#4. Ref; Plan Sheet E4. Revise the restroom exhaust fan numbers to reflect the correct numbers. All three are numbered EF1.
#5. Ref; Plan Sheet E5 and M1.1. Panel schedule for panel A shows HP-4 with a OCPD rated at 30 amps. This does not correlate with rating shown on the mechanical plan HEAT PUMP SCHEDULE.
#6. The plumbing plans show 3 electric water heaters. Include these on the electrical power floor plans and panel schedules.
#7. Ref; Plan Sheet E5, Panel L and Line Diagram.
(a) The power requirements for the instantaneous water heater 'EX280' require 3 dedicated power circuits. Coordinate with the plumbing designer for the correct power requirements.
(b) The GEC and Neutral conductor bond should be in the main service disconnect, not in panel L. NEC 250.24a.
(c) The feeder to panel L should be 3 -500kcmil not 2. Two ungrounded, 1 grounded, and #2 ground.
(d) The new 400 amp service can only be fed overhead by the utility if the existing service is fed overhead. Otherwise a Underground Service Waiver will need to be approved. Is the new 400 amp service replacing the existing? If yes, please indicate this on the plan.


Ref; 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code
09/21/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T18CM06259
Building Plans (1st Review), Iglesia De Cristo
841 E Bantam Rd

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2018

DUE DATE: September 25, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. An approved development package (DP) is needed for comparison at the time of the building plan review by zoning.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the revised and approved DP (with PDSD stamp) with the next building submittal.) The PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP shall not be incorporated into the building plans unless it is a PDSD approved and stamped copy.

3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning.

4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.

If you have any questions please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building plans and revised and approved version of the DP as reference.
09/21/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change T18CM06259

1) Coordinate with Development Package (DP) to ensure that roof drains scupper underneath sidewalks. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.E
2) Building plans cannot be approved until the DP has been approved and all outstanding department review comments have been addressed

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/09/2018 SVALENZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed