Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM05587
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2018 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/27/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet T1; Special Inspectiions: Please reference structural Sheets S1.1 and S1.2 on this sheet for required special inspections. Coordinate Sheet T1 with those structural sheets. 2. Sheet T1; Applicable Codes: Please add the 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 accessibility code to this list. 3. Sheet T1; Development Data (Occupant Load): Per the IBC Table 1004.1.2, the gross square footage must be used for a business occupancy to determine the occupant load. Please verify Note 3. 4. Sheet T1; Development Data: Please verify the plumbing fixture tabulations for the revised occupant load. 5. Sheet T1; Development Data: Please indicate on this sheet the number of required/provided exits and the exit width required/provided. 6. Sheet A1 (Floor Plan); Wall Legend: It is difficult to determine the extent of the one hour rated partitions on the plan. The section cuts 2/A3 and 2A/A3 are not continuous. Please clarify the fire resistance rated walls on the plan. 7. Sheet A1; Wall Legend: Why are the walls (designated by Details 2/A3 and 2A/A3) fire resistance rated? Please indicate the U.L. identification number or the IBC Table 721.1 item number for the fire resistance rated walls, and verify if these walls are fire walls, fire barriers or fire partitions (IBC Sections 706, 707, or 708). 8. Sheet A1; Floor Plan: At the drinking fountain locations, please indicate a high/low fixture. 9. Sheet A1 (Floor Plan); Sheet A3 (Detail 4): The offices on the north and south building walls indicate typical window W5, while Detail 4/A3 indicates a W1 window type at the same locations. Please clarify. 10. Sheet A1 (Floor Plan); Sheet A7 (Door Schedule): Door 167B (at I.T. Room 167) indicates "Exit Only" in the schedule. Please clarify. 11. Sheet A1 (Floor Plan); Sheet A7 (Door Schedule): The Door Schedule does not indicate any fire resistance rated doors, although there are doors in rated walls. Please verify. 12. Sheet A3; Detail 9: Please provide a reference to structural for the screen wall frames. 13. Sheet A3; Details 2 and 2A: If this is a fire resistance rated partition (barrier or partition), the construction must extend from the top of the foundation or floor to the underside of the floor or roof sheathing (IBC Sections 707.5 or 708.4). The detail must be revised. 14. Sheet A3; Detail 1: Please indicate the brace stud size, and the size and quantity of connectors at the roof and at the partition. 15. Sheet A6; Shower Accessory Mounting Elevation: Per the ICC/ANSI Figures 608.3.3 and 608.4.3, the grab bars indicated on the mounting elevation do not match those figures. Please verify. 16. Sheet A6; Plans 1 and 3: Please indicate a high/low drinking fountain where shown on the plan. 17. Sheet A6; Fixture Mounting Elevations: At the drinking fountain, indicate the high/low fixture using the ICC/ANSI requirements in Section 602 for spout heights (accessible and non-accessible). 18. Sheet A6; Details 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D: Is the section next to Detail 5C typical for all of these details? Please indicate. 19. Sheet A9; Detail 2: Please indicate the metal framing/bracing size and spacing. In addition, indicate the size and quantity of connectors at the roof and at the partitiion. 20. Sheet A11; Detail 10: Please provide the horizontal leg length of the bent plate at the top of the ladder. 21. Sheet A11; Detail 10: Please provide the clip angle thickness at the bottom of the ladder. 22. Sheet A11; Detail 10: Please add a reference to this detail to see structural for framing at the roof opening. 23. Sheet A12; Detail 3: Please provide structural calculations for the masonry wall and footing. 24. Sheet S3.0; Details 103 and 105: Are these details very similar? Please verify. 25. Sheet S3.0; Detail 107: Please add Note 1 on the detail. 26. Sheet S3.0; Detail 104: Is there adequate concrete cover at the column below the top of the slab elevation? Please verify. 27. Sheet S3.1; Detail 113: This detail is located where a 12'x6" tube column (C7 on Sheet S2.0) sits on a 18" square base plate located just above the footing. The 12" tube column is encased by a 12" wide column pedestal (Note 6 on Detail 113). Is this adequate concrete cover for the tube column? Does the tube column stop at the top of the concrete pedestal? Please verify. 28. Sheet S4.1; Detail 220: Please indicate how the 1/8" bent plate (Note 13) is connected to the 1/4" bent plate (Note 5) at the top and bottom of the wide flange beam (reference Detail 218). 29. Sheet S4.1; Detail 220: Please indicate how the 1/4" bent plate (Note 5) is connected to the 1/4" U-plate (Note 3). 30. Sheet S4.2; Detail 230: Please adjust Notes 3 and 4. 31. Sheet S4.2; Detail 230: Note 3 indicates (2) 3/4" diameter bolts while 3 are shown on the detail. Please verify. 32. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate. 33. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 08/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate riser diagram 1/P4.0 with the plumbing plan (water closet P2 in room 103 labeled as P3 in riser diagram). 2. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage for the clerestory roof or show that the roof is capable of supporting the maximum rain load if the primary roof drainage is blocked. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. |
| 08/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/02/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (e.g. COMcheck). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. As a minimum, the information shall include the maximum U-factors of the fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the maximum SHGC for the fenestration. Note that Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Clarify the types of partitions (e.g. fire-rated partitions) on the mechanical floor plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Clarify the limits of the return air plenums. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 202 (plenum), IMC 2012. 4. The mechanical room (159) has a supply diffuser connected to the duct for EF-1. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. The exhaust schedule calls for 1450 CFM of exhaust for EF-1 but the balancing data on sheet M1.0 shows 1000 CFM of exhaust and 350 CFM of "supply". Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. The return duct for HP-11 shows an "open" 12" return duct as well as two ducted return grilles. How will this be balanced? Reference: Section 603.18, IMC 2012. 7. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for heat pumps HP-15 and HP-19. Reference: Section 606.2.1, IMC 2012. 8. Secure the refrigerant circuit access ports of the ground-mounted condensing units to prevent unauthorized access. Reference: Section 1101.10, IMC 2012. |
| 08/09/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM05587 - New Building (Commercial Use - Administrative Office) Related to DP18-0166 Building Plan Review (1st Review) David Advisors 6255 S. Palo Verde Road - I-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 9, 2018 DUE DATE: August 16, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current unapproved version of the development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc.) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the building plans have been approved by the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (If a copy of the DP is to be included in the Building Package it must be the approved and signed copy of the DP. Remove the unapproved version of the DP from the Building package or annotate it as "Reference only see the approved and Signed DP" 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 08/14/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM05587 1) Engineering has reviewed the building plans and they appear to be in conformance with the unapproved Development Package (DP). Once the DP has been approved, any outstanding commercial review comments on the building plans have been addressed and a new work flow has been opened, Engineering can conduct an over the counter review and approval. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 08/16/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref; Plan Sheet EP701. (a) Provide a legend for the numbers that are encircled. (b) Provide a feeder schedule that correlates for all the feeders shown on the one line diagram. (c) Provide a complete panel schedule for panel 'DP1', and locate on the power floor plan. Ref; 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/29/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/29/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |