Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T18CM02149
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/30/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 04/30/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/30/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet A2.1.P; Graphic Legend: Please indicate on the two hour assembly and the one hour assembly that they are fire barriers. 2. Sheet A4.5.P1; Section 7: Please indicate Grid Line 4.3 on this section. 3. Sheet A2.1.P; Floor Plan: Please indicate Grid Line 9.5 on the floor plan. This grid line appears on Section 6/A4.2.P1 (in the existing building). 4. Sheet A2.1.P; Floor Plan: Please clear up the section indicator 3/A4.2.P1 through the chapel. It is not legible in the current location. 5. Sheet A3.1.P1; Ceiling Plan: Is a ceiling legend provided for the various designations on the plan? Please verify. 6. Sheet A9.0.1; Partition Types 7C and 7D (2 hour): The boxed information indicates a one hour rated partition, while the Partition Type indicates a two hour. Please clarify. 7. Sheet A9.0.1; Partition Type 8: The Partition Types 8A and 8C indicate non-rated, one hour, and two hour partitions, but the boxed information does not include a two hour rated partition. Please clarify. 8. Sheet A9.0.1; Partition Type 9: The Partition Type 9U indicates non-rated, one hour, and two hour partitions, but the boxed information does not include a one hour rated partition. Please clarify. 9. Sheet A9.0.1; Sheet Number: This drawing indicates "For Reference Only". Does that apply to this project? Please verify. 10. Sheet A9.0.2; Sheet Number: This drawing indicates "For Reference Only". Does that apply to this project? Please verify. 11. Sheet A9.2.1; Sheet Number: This drawing indicates "For Reference Only". Does that apply to this project? Please verify. 12. Sheet S0.1.P; General Structural Notes (Design Loads): The notes indicate the seismic design category as A and the site classification as C. The City of Tucson requires a minimum seismic design category of B and the site classification of D. Please revise the notes and calculations as required. 13. Sheet S0.1.P; General Structural Notes (Foundations): Please provide one copy of the soil report indicated in Note 1. 14. General: Please provide the structural calculations. None were located in this submittal. 15. General: Has the square footage and occupant load of this Pavillion Area been included with a previous submittal? Is this submittal for a letter of completion only? Please verify and provide information as required. 16. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 05/07/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 2. Show how accommodation for the thermal expansion of the hot water system is being provided. Reference: Section 607.3, IPC 2012. 3. State the minimum slope for the stormwater conuctors. Reference: Section107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 05/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/15/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1 Provide complete compliance with the 2012 IECC for the lighting. #2 Provide complete compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code for the exterior lighting. #3 Provide a feeder schedule for the feeders related to this project to correlate with the line diagrams. #4 Provide panel schedules and load calcs for all the new and or revised lighting panels for this project. Ref; 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, 2012 IECC sec C405, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/15/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | T18CM02149 1) Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standard (TSM) 7-01.4.1.E John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2018 | TWEIDEM1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 05/31/2018 | TWEIDEM1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/31/2018 | TWEIDEM1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |