Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T17CM07765
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T17CM07765 - New Data Center Building 918 Building Plan Review (2nd Review) 1151 E Hermans Road TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 16, 2017 DUE DATE: November 28, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. FOllow up comment Comment 1 is related to previous comment 2 and was made to request a clarifification, previous comments 3, and 4 are still applicable. 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 2: Per the response by Ty Ransdell to the previous zoning comment 2, The building is 120'x100'. Clarify if this was just a typo on the last response, the building plans are dimensioned with a 1oo' x 160' out to out dimensions. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2: As part of the DP review zoning also reviewed the Data Center building plans concurrently. Per the revised DP the building square footage of the Data Center is listed as 17,365 SF. Per the building plans the dimensions of the Data Center building are labeled as 100' x 160' which equals 16,000 SF. This is a substantial discrepancy and must be addressed. Clarify which SF is correct or proposed. Previous COMMENT 3: Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the two items above have been addressed and the building plans have been approved by all PDSD or 3rd Party commercial plans review agencies. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: Zoning will do review of the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview, such as SF, Building Height and building location etc. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans |
| 11/16/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL Regarding response to previous Mechanical comment 3: R and U-values for exterior envelope may require revision based on Building comments 1 and 2 above. |
| 11/16/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T17CM07765 - PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS – 2nd review Reviewer: Chris Anderson, November 15, 2017 BUILDING – COMMERCIAL Regarding the response to previous Building comment 6: The insulation for this metal building must comply with the energy Code. The COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate submitted (page 1 of the COMcheck) has not been filled out properly and gives no certification that the tradeoff option for the metal building envelope with R-30 roof insulation, R-19 wall insulation, R-8 roll up door, and U-? (select a U-factor for metal swing doors and add it to either the door schedule or Spec Section 081113) swing doors complies with the 2012 IECC. Resubmit a fully filled out envelope COMcheck with selected “envelope assemblies” that are specifically for pre-engineered “metal buildings” (and not “metal framed” buildings) and with the insulation values shown above. Do not use the “Cont (inuous) R-Value” column since the insulation shown in the wall section is installed in the cavities between studs, girts and roof purlins. And, the roof assembly selected should not be one that includes R-5 thermal blocks since the metal building drawings show none. The printout should then indicate that the “Envelope PASSES: Design ?% better than Code.” If the envelope as shown in the architectural drawings does not pass the COMcheck, please revise the drawings and COMcheck until it passes. Please resubmit the Metallic drawings in 24” x 36” format. All text, both upper and lower case, must be minimum 3/32” high per City of Tucson standard. |
| 11/16/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/27/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/27/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/27/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |