Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T17CM07583
Parcel: 11507307B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T17CM07583
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/16/2017 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The residential provisions of the 2012 International Energy Compliance Code are the controlling energy code requirement for the residential areas of this project and the commercial provisions are applicable to the community center. Reference: Sections C101.4.6, C101.5, and R101.5, IECC 2012.
2. Provide calculations demonstrating energy code compliance for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Reference: Sections C401.2, R101.4.3, R101.5, R103.2, and R401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Show how the building envelope is to be constructed to limit the air leakage per the requirements of Section R402.4, IECC 2012.
4. Provide the air infiltration rate for all windows and sliding doors as tested per NFRC 400 or AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/IS2 A440. Reference: Section R402.4.3, IECC 2012.
5. Specify a programmable thermostat for each residential air handler that complies with the requirements of Section R403.1.1, IECC 2012.
6. Specify programmable thermostats for the heat pumps serving the community areas that comply with the capabilities required by Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
7. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains from the corridor fan coils (FC-C). Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Clarify how the shaft construction complies with the fire-resistance rating requirements of the IBC. The larger shafts are shown with wall-type 6 on the first floor and third floor but wall-type 3 on the second floor. The smaller shafts for the range exhausts do not have a specified wall-type. Reference: Section 607.6, IMC 2012.
9. Clarify how the two 4" diameter dryer vents, the two 6" diameter outside air ducts, and the two 6" diameter exhaust air ducts located in the same shaft comply with Section 607.6.1, IMC 2012.
10. Provide justification for the penetration of a fire-rated shaft by the range exhaust ducts. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11. Secure the refrigerant circuit access ports of the condensing units located on grade to prevent unauthorized access. Reference: Section 1101.10, IMC 2012.
10/16/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show the location of the proposed water meters, backflow preventers, and the water service pipes on a site plan. The development package is not a substitute for a complete site plan. Reference: section 107.2.5, IBC 2012.
2. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Clarify detail 204 on sheet P2.0: where is this regulator located and how does it relate to this activity? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Provide riser diagrams of the hot water distribution systems for the apartments. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
5. Correct the first floor plumbing waste plan, which shows 2" horizontal drains downstream of 4" waste stacks. Any fitting or connection in a drainage system that results in a reduction of the pipe area is prohibited. Reference: Section 706.2, IPC 2012.
6. Coordinate the waste isometric with the plumbing plans: see keynote #10 on sheet P2.0 for the size of the waste stack. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
7. The two buildings have a total sewer flow of 4600 gallons per day and a manhole in the private sewer collection system. The private sewer collection system will require review of the sewer design from the manhole to the connection to the public sewer system by the Pima County Development Services Department. Reference: Table 1, Title 18, Chapter 9, Arizona Administrative Code.
8. Provide the rim elevation of the proposed sanitary manhole. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.
10. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. The opening in the scupper collection box is not a secondary drain. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.
11. Provide the calculations used to determine the dimensions of the rain gutters, the gutter slope, and number of downspouts. Reference: Section 1106.6, IPC 2012.
10/16/2017 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
10/23/2017 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/24/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T17CM07583
1. Sheet T1.0; Special Project Information: The accessible dwelling units calculation indicates 5% of all units must be accessible. Per the IBC Section 1107.6.2.1, Type A units must make up 2% of the total number of units where the number of units is greater than 20. All other units shall be Type B (1107.7.1.1 and 1107.7.1.2). Please indicate this information on Sheet T1. As stated on this sheet, all units are accessible, so the unit requirements are met.
2. Sheet T1.0; Special Project Information: Please indicate on this sheet the accessible units shall meet the requirements of the ICC/ANSI Section 1002, Type A units Section 1003, and Type B units Section 1004.
3. Sheet T1.0; Special Project Information: Please include on this sheet the section reference for the required number of hearing impaired units.
4. Sheet T1.0; Building Occupancy: Please include a breakdown of the occupant load on this sheet.
5. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: The elevator equipment room indicates W-1 wall types. Per the IBC Section 3006, the equipment room is required to have fire resistance rated walls (fire barriers per Section 707). Please provide on the plan.
6. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: Please indicate on the drawing the purpose of the room on the west exterior wall of Unit #1111 (fire riser/equipment room). Do the walls require a fire resistance rating?
7. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: Please indicate on the plan (or on an enlarged plan like 5/A8.0) the clearance at the bathtub meets the requirements of the ICC/ANSI Section 607.2.
8. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: The stair between the two building segments is an exterior stairway, and must meet the requirements of the IBC Section 1026. Please review Sections 1026.3 (Open Sides), 1026.5 (Location), and 1026.6 (Stairway protection), and verify the stair meets the requirements.
9. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: The wall separating Units #1102 and #1105, and separating Units #1103 and #1104 indicate a W-1 wall type. Please revise.
10. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: The corridor doors into the units must be fire resistant rated (see the IBC Table 716.5). The door schedule (Sheet A5.0) does not indicate a rated door (Door 1). Please verify.
11. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: The corridor walls (W-4) indicate a one hour rated wall. Per the IBC Table 1018.1, a 0.5 hour rated wall is permitted. Please verify.
12. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: Walls separating dwelling/sleeping units shall be fire partitions (see the IBC Sections 420 and 708). The plan indicates a one hour rated wall (W-4). Per the IBC Section 708.3, a 0.5 hour rated wall is permitted. Please verify.
13. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: The end walls at the corridors indicate wall type W-1. These walls must be fire resistant rated walls, and the doors (Door 3) must also be rated. Please verify.
14. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: Per the IBC Section 420, the floor assemblies between dwelling/sleeping units must be fire resistance rated per the IBC Section 711. Please provide a note/details indicating those requirements are met.
15. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: Please include notes/details on the drawings indicating penetrations through the fire resistance rated walls/floors meet the requirements of the IBC Section 714.
16. Sheet A2.0; Floor Plan: There are rated shaft walls (W-6) indicated in each unit, but there are also other shafts in each unit that do not indicate fire resistance rated walls. Please indicate and verify the requirements of the IBC Section 713 are met.
17. Sheet A2.1; Floor Plan: Please address comments 5 through 16 (first floor), and revise this sheet as required for this floor.
18. Sheet A2.2; Floor Plan: Please address comments 5 through 16 (first floor), and revise this sheet as required for this floor.
19. Sheet A2.3; Floor Plan: Keynote 21 indicates a shaft with wall type W-4. Just above this shaft, a wall type W-3 is indicated. Please coordinate. This is a shaft referenced in comment 16. Please add a note to all floor plans concerning the fire resistance rating of the shaft walls.
20. Sheet A2.3; Keynotes: Note 2 indicates 34" countertop heights at accessible units, and 36" countertop heights at standard units. The Special Project Information note on Sheet T1.0 indicated all units are accessible. Please clarify.
21. Sheet A2.3; Keynotes: Notes 8 and 17 indicate accessible and non-accessible units. The Special Project Information note on Sheet T1.0 indicated all units are accessible. Please clarify.
22. Sheet A3.0; Floor Plan: A section cut indicates 4/A7.1. Please revise.
23. Sheet A8.1; Keynote 19: Please add verbiage to this note to include spout outlet heights (ICC/ANSI Section 602.4), clear floor space (Section 602.2), and knee/toe clearance (306).
24. General: Provide construction details of all fire resistance rated walls. Indicate the U.L. listing number for each.
25. Sheet S1.1; General Structural Notes (Foundations): The note indicates a soil report was used to design the foundation. Please provide one copy of that report for review.
26. Sheet S2.1; Foundation Plan: The interior corridor footings are not indicated on the plan. Please verify and provide.
27. Sheet S2.1; Column Schedule: Should the last column mark be C8? Please verify.
28. Sheet S3.1; Drawing Title: The drawing title indicates First Floor and Low Roof Framing Plan, while the plan title is 2nd Floor/Low Roof Framing Plan. Please coordinate.
29. Sheet S3.1; Framing Plan: At the east end of the building (near southeast corner of the low roof area), a beam indicates BX. Please revise.
30. Sheets S3.1 and S4.1; Framing Plans: On the floor framing plans, a lintel over the unit door opening is indicated, but no beam/lintel mark is indicated. Please provide.
31. Sheet S4.1; Drawing Title: The drawing title indicates Second Floor/Low Roof Framing Plan, while the plan title is 3rd Floor/Low Roof Framing Plan. Please coordinate.
32. Sheet S4.1; Framing Plan: At the west end of the building (in the low roof area), beams on both sides of the corridor (two total) indicate BX. Please revise.
33. Sheet S5.1 (Framing Plan); Structural Calculations (Sheets 3 and 4): The calculations indicate lintel RL2 (2-2x6), but the framing plan does not call out a lintel mark. Please revise the framing plan for all locations.
34. Sheet S6.1; Details 113, 114, and 115: Should the footing on Detail 114 extend 12" from the face of the masonry wall per Details 113 and 114? Please indicate on the detail.
35. Sheet S6.1; Detail 101: Please indicate a typical 24" minimum dimension from grade/slab to the bottom of the footing.
36. Sheet S6.1; Details 101, 105, 110, and 111: Please call out the continuous footing reinforcing.
37. Sheet S6.2; Detail 122: Please call out the continuous footing reinforcing.
38. Sheet S9.1: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the section cuts.
39. Structural Calculations: The calculations for the building foundations were not located. Please verify and provide.
40. General: Per the IBC Section 1029, emergency escape and rescue openings are required for R-2 occupancy classifications for sleeping rooms below the fourth floor. Please verify all windows in sleeping rooms meet the requirements of the IBC Section 1029, and list those requirements on the drawings (Sections 1029.1 through 1029.4).
41. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
11/01/2017 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the electrical review comment. Also provide a written response.
#1. The community center will require 2012 IECC compliance for the lighting per sec, C101.4.6.
11/07/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T17CM07583 - Multi-Family Develoment
Building Plans (1st Review)
20 E Adams Street

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2017

DUE DATE: November 9, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current version of the (unapproved) development package DP16-0240. While the building footprint is consistent with the current version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Use, Building footprint, Height, Building square footage, Site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans and the Development Package has been fully approved by PDSD.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the approved DP.

3. COMMENT: AS of this building plan review the DP had not been approved. There are remaining items that need to be addressed on the DP that deal with coverage and density on the R-2 portion of the site. Due to the density item the building plans may have to be revised in order to meet the density allowance in the R-2 zone portion. If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning.

4. COMMENT: Label the building heights on the elevations drawings in order to verify that the setbacks have been met. The heights should be labeled for the north, south, east and west elevations specifically the walls facing the property lines.

5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference.
11/14/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/15/2017 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed