Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM05292
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2017 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/13/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/13/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/24/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. General: The code information on the large drawings (by Hoch) does not match the information listed on the small drawings (by Oldcastle). Please verify the occupancy classification and the building SF, and coordinate. 2. General: The precast concrete building and the concrete foundation are approved by the State of Arizona and will not have a structural review by the City of Tucson. 3. General: Was the location of this building indicated on the site plan included in the development package (as reviewed for setbacks, clearances, etc.)? Please verify. 4. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 07/25/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T17CM05292 - New Telecom Unmanned Service Building Building Plans (1st Review) 905 E Macarthur Circle / I-1 Zone TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2017 DUE DATE: August 8, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current version of the (unapproved) development package DP17-0133. While the building footprint is consistent with the current version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Use, Building footprint, Height, Building square footage, Site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans and the Development Package has been fully approved by PDSD. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include as reference a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference. |
| 08/01/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Provide details including the size and wiring methods for the DC Plant shown on plan sheet E101. If it cannot be determined at this time, provide a note on the plan to defer the battery installation to a future submittal or revision, or separate permit by others. #2. Ref: Plan Sheet E202. (a) Please clarify the purpose of the 6- 30 amp 2p circuits between the panel 'LP1-A' and the DC Plant. (b) The one-line diagram shows panel 'LP1-A' as a 60 circuit panel. The panel schedule shows it as a 84 circuit, please clarify. (c) Provide for signage as required per NEC art. 702.7. (d) Please clarify the note at the bottom of the panel schedule reference to specification '3.1'. (e) Provide available fault current and AIC ratings at the electrical service and equipment downstream. #3. Provide complete compliance with the 2012 IECC for lighting. #4. Provide full compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. Can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. Ref; 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC. |
| 08/08/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP must be approved first. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |