Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T17CM04810
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Discount Tire - Tucson Market Place T17CM04810 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 3, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the proposed building plans match development package DP17-0056 but until the development package is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Install the proposed vacuum relief valve for the water heater per the manufacturer's listing information, i.e. with no valves located between the vacuum relief valve and the water heater. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide an approved vacuum relief valve for the scheduled bottom-fed water heater located above the fixture outlets. Reference: Section 504.2, IPC 2012.] 2. Revise the 2" vent that is shown running under the slab; it must rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures it protects prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. |
| 08/03/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. The outdoor lighting information provided not was sufficient to verify compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Code. Evidence on the plans should include: (a) Parcel size in acres. (b). Total lumens per acre for proposed exterior lighting this parcel. (c). Shielding information. (d). Total lumens allowed per table 401.1, complies, yes or no. (e). Indicate whether a special inspection is required per section 106.2.1. AS required per section 104.2 Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 08/03/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. |
| 08/03/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The minimum font size for drawings is 3/32". [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C302.2, C403.2.1, and C403.2.2, IECC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.] 2. Comment not resolved; the architectural and mechanical drawings are not coordinated for number or location. [Initial comment: Coordinate the number, location, and type of electric unit heaters with those shown on the architectural drawings. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 08/11/2017 | AHINES2 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |