Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM06577
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/07/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G2.1.1; CODES/STANDARDS: PLEASE REVISE THE ICC/ANSI ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THE 2009 EDITION. 2. SHEET G2.2.1; LEVEL 03: NO EXIT SIGNS ARE INDICATED AT THE EAST OR WEST STAIRS. PLEASE VERIFY. 3. SHEETS S2.1.1A, S2.1.1B, S2.2.1A, AND S2.2.1B: THE 'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INFORMATION ONLY' NOTE HAS BEEN CROSSED OUT, INDICATING THERE WERE CHANGES ON THIS SHEET FOR REVISION 4. IF REVISION 4 DRAWINGS WERE APPROVED ON ANOTHER SUBMITTAL, THESE SHEETS WOULD BE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. PLEASE VERIFY. 4. SHEET S2.3.1B: SEE COMMENT 3. 5. SHEETS PC-1.00 THROUGH PC-6.01: THESE SHEETS ARE NOTED AS 'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INFORMATION ONLY'. WILL THESE BE SUBMITTED AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? PLEASE FOLLOW THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1 REQUIREMENTS. 6. SHEET A0.1; FIRE RESISTIVE RATING INDICATION: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE NOTE TO INDICATE WHERE THESE INDICATORS ARE USED. 7. SHEET A0.1; ARCHITECTURAL ASSEMBLY SYSTEM TAGS: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE NOTE TO INDICATE WHERE THESE TAGS ARE USED. 8. SHEETS A2.1.1A THROUGH A2.3.1B: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE TO THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING INDICATORS ON SHEET A0.1 TO INDICATE WHERE THESE INDICATORS ARE USED, OR INCLUDE THAT TABLE FROM SHEET A0.1 ON THESE SHEETS. 9. SHEET A6.1.1; PLAN 44: TO THE RIGHT OF THE STAIR IS A BOXED NOTE. IS THIS NOTE REQUIRED HERE? 10. SHEET A7.2.1; PLAN 20: PLEASE REFERENCE THE WALL TYPE DESIGNATIONS TO SHEET A9.2.1. 11. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 2: PLEASE ADD A NOTE IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE GARAGE FLOOR LIVE LOAD PER THE IBC TABLE 1607.1(a). IT IS INDICATED IN THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (SHEET S1.1), BUT NOT IN THE CALCULATIONS. 12. GENERAL: ARE THE ELEVATORS PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS? IF SO, PLEASE VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1007.4 ARE MET. 13. GENERAL: FOR ALL FIRE RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLIES INDICATED IN THIS SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE THE APPLICABLE U.L. DESIGN NUMBER. 14. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 16/P6.1. Reference: Sections 708.3.5, 708.5, and 1101.8, IPC 2012. 2. Coordinate the storm riser diagram with the plumbing plans and include the area drains for the stair landings. Show drainage areas for the area drains and the roof drain located at DW-7. 3. Show the size and routing of the roof drain and overflow drain piping located near column DW-7. 4. Verify the size of the horizontal storm drain pipes based on a 1% slope. Reference: Section 1106.3, IPC 2012. |
| 09/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Mechanical Compliance Certificate states that an economizer is not required for FCU-3 due to the low operating hours. Show how the hours of operation were calculated to be less than 20-hours per week. Reference: Section C403.3.1 (4), IECC 2012. |
| 09/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/08/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 09/09/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T16CM06577 Building plans for Banner Parking Structure (1st Review) 3838 N Campbell Avenue TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 9, 2016 DUE DATE: September 20, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. While the building plans are consistent with the approved Development Package, zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal. Zoning will review the building plans to ensure that any changes necessary due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments do not affect the building footprint or height. Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers zoning will approve the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans |
| 09/21/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Provide complete compliance with the TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. Can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. #2. The luminaire count does not seem to correlate with the IECC com check for the exterior lighting. #3. Ref; plan sheet E4.1A and E4.1B. Please identify the little light fixture looking symbols with the number 30 next to them. Not on the symbols plan. Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2012 IECC, 2011 NEC |
| 09/22/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/29/2016 | RBENT2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |